Group B Streptococcus (GBS) Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Concordance Study
Prospective Evaluation of a Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Assay (GenExpert DX™) for the Rapid Detection of Recto-vaginal Group B Streptococcus (GBS) Colonisation During Intrapartum Screening
1 other identifier
observational
500
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The investigators are comparing three different methods of testing for an infection which is commonly found in women. The infection is caused by a bacterium called Group B Streptococcus. About 10-30% of women carry GBS in the vagina or rectum. During labour this infection can be passed to the neonate. This can lead to the baby developing a serious infection. However, research has shown that if antibiotic treatment is given to GBS carrying women during labour most of these infections can be avoided. A new bedside test known as PCR has been shown to produce a GBS diagnostic result in less than an hour. In clinical trials conducted in the US and France this method has been shown to be more accurate than either prenatal vaginal swabs or risk factor assessment. For this reason, PCR may be helpful in screening and treating GBS positive women in the UK. In this study the investigators will compare each of the following three methods of diagnosis to a gold standard.
- Prenatal vaginal culture swab (at 35 to 37 weeks gestation)- The US approach.
- Risk factor assessment (at the time of admission for labour)- The UK approach
- The new PCR test (at the time of your labour admission) The investigators will compare the accuracy of each of these methods with the most accurate method for determining the GBS status during labour. This 'most accurate' method is a highly sensitive swab test which unfortunately takes several days to produce a result. For this reason this test will not tell the investigators whether prophylactic antibiotics may be useful during labour (Receiving them after birth is ineffective). If PCR is shown to be a more accurate method of identifying GBS positive women this may help to reduce the number of infections in new born infants and as a result may help to save lives.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2010
Typical duration for all trials
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 8, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 9, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2012
CompletedJune 23, 2010
September 1, 2009
2.7 years
September 8, 2009
June 22, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Eligibility Criteria
Pregnant females
You may qualify if:
- Patients will be included in the study if they are;
- years or older
- Pregnant and planned admission to Portland Hospital whether full-term or otherwise.
- Willing and able to give informed consent prenatally.
You may not qualify if:
- Scheduled for non vaginal birth
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
The Portland Women ansd Children's Hospital
London, W1W 5AH, United Kingdom
The Portland Hospital
London, W1W 5QT, United Kingdom
Biospecimen
Vaginal culture swabs
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Simon Bignall
Portland Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 8, 2009
First Posted
September 9, 2009
Study Start
January 1, 2010
Primary Completion
September 1, 2012
Study Completion
October 1, 2012
Last Updated
June 23, 2010
Record last verified: 2009-09