Evaluation of the Effects of HP828-101 Versus Standard of Care in the Management of Partial or Full Thickness Wounds
1 other identifier
interventional
88
1 country
11
Brief Summary
To compare HP828-101 to standard of care for the management of partial or full thickness wounds
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2009
11 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 27, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 3, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 27, 2014
CompletedJanuary 27, 2014
December 1, 2013
1.3 years
August 27, 2009
October 9, 2013
December 11, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Adequate Management of the Wound Assessed by a Left Movement (Improvement) in the Modified Bates Jensen Wound Assessment Tool.
Modified Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment (BWAT-m) Scores for those characteristics measured (wound size, depth, edges, undermining, necrotic tissue type and amount, exudate type and amount, periwound color and edema, granulation tissue, and epithelialization) were each graded on a 5-point scale, with 1 being the best and 5 being the worst.
22 - 29 days
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Number of Participants With Wound Closure by Day 22.
22 days
Pain Assessed by a 100-mm VAS Scale.
At every visit: Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 29
Moist Wound Environment as Per the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT)
At every visit: Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 29
Study Arms (2)
HP828-101
EXPERIMENTALStandard of Care
ACTIVE COMPARATORFor DFU SoC is a hydrogel. For PU SoC is a hydrocolloid gel.
Interventions
Topical test article applied once daily
Hydrogel for DFU and Hydrocolloid for PU (3M Tegaderm Hydrogel for DFU; ConvaTec DuoDERM Hydroactive Gel for PU); Topical test articles applied once daily
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The informed consent document must be read, signed, and dated by the subject or the subject's legally authorized representative before conducting any study procedures or exams. In addition, the informed consent document must be signed and dated by the individual who consents the subject before conducting Visit 1. A photocopy of the signed informed consent document must be provided to the subject, and the original signed document placed in the subject's chart. For subjects that agree to have their wound photographed for the trial, a photo release consent form must be signed and documented as well.
- Age 18 years or older, of either sex, and of any race or skin type, provided that their skin color, in the opinion of the Investigator, will not interfere with the study assessments.
- Females, if of child-bearing potential, have a negative urine pregnancy test and agree to use acceptable contraception during the study. Adequate birth control methods are defined as: hormonal-topical, oral, implantable, or injectable contraceptives; mechanical-spermicide in conjunction with a barrier such as a condom or diaphragm; IUD; or surgical sterilization of partner.
- Have a partial or full thickness PU on the foot or ankle or DFU of \<= 6 months duration and between ≥1.0 and ≤ 12.0 cm² in area.
- Are willing to make all required study visits.
- Are willing to follow instructions, in the opinion of the Investigator.
- Have, within 12 weeks prior to randomization, a serum albumin level ≥ 2.0 g/dL (20 g/L); Alkaline phosphatase, AST, ALT, serum creatinine, and BUN levels \< 3 x upper limit of normal; HbA1C ≤ 12%; and Hemoglobin \>= 8 g/dL. The most recently obtained value must be evaluated against these criteria. Please refer to Appendix 18.1.5
- Have arterial supply adequacy confirmed by an Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) \>= 0.7 and ≤ 1.1 or if the ABI is \> 1.1, either a TcPO2 \>= 40 mmHg, as measured on the foot, or great toe pressure ≥ 50 mm/Hg,
- For ulcers that will require surgical debridement prior to enrollment, the wound must be expected to remain a partial thickness wound after debridement.
You may not qualify if:
- Have a known hypersensitivity to any of the test articles or their components.
- Have received therapy with another investigational agent within thirty (30) days of Visit 1.
- Are pregnant or nursing.
- Have clinical evidence of bacterial or fungal infection of the wound per visual/clinical assessment.
- Have a severe burn, immunodeficiency disorder, hematologic disorder, or metastatic malignancy.
- Have had documented osteomyelitis on the target ulcer leg within 6 months preceding the screening visit.
- Have severe edema of the target ulcer leg.
- If being treated with Xenaderm, must stop treatment prior to enrolling in the study.
- Have received treatment with glucocorticoids for \> 10 consecutive days within 6 months prior to the start of the study.
- Have received chemotherapy or radiation therapy within the past 5 years.
- Therapy of the target ulcer with tissue-engineered cell-based skin equivalents within 30 days preceding the Screening Visit (e.g., Apligraf®).
- Therapy of the target ulcer with topical growth factors within 1 week preceding the Screening Visit.
- Current therapy with systemic or topical antibiotics or systemic therapy with cytotoxic drugs.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Healthpointlead
Study Sites (11)
Trovare Clinical Research
Bakersfield, California, 93311, United States
Absolute Foot Care
Chula Vista, California, 91910, United States
Roy Kroeker
Fresno, California, 93710, United States
Innovative Medical Technologies
Los Angeles, California, 90063, United States
San Diego Research Center
San Diego, California, 92103, United States
Foot and Ankle Associates of Florida
Altamonte Springs, Florida, 32701, United States
Weil Foot and Ankle Institute
Des Plaines, Illinois, 60016, United States
Prigoff-Bowers LLP
Dallas, Texas, 75224, United States
Richard Galperin, DPM
Dallas, Texas, 75224, United States
Robert Wunderlich, DPM
San Antonio, Texas, 78212, United States
Dixie Regional Wound Clinic
St. George, Utah, 84770, United States
Related Publications (10)
Ovington LG. The evolution of wound management: ancient origins and advances of the past 20 years. Home Healthc Nurse. 2002 Oct;20(10):652-6. doi: 10.1097/00004045-200210000-00009.
PMID: 12394337BACKGROUNDWinter GD. Formation of the scab and the rate of epithelisation of superficial wounds in the skin of the young domestic pig. 1962. J Wound Care. 1995 Sep;4(8):366-7; discussion 368-71. No abstract available.
PMID: 7553187BACKGROUNDHINMAN CD, MAIBACH H. EFFECT OF AIR EXPOSURE AND OCCLUSION ON EXPERIMENTAL HUMAN SKIN WOUNDS. Nature. 1963 Oct 26;200:377-8. doi: 10.1038/200377a0. No abstract available.
PMID: 14087904BACKGROUNDAndersen CA, Roukis TS. The diabetic foot. Surg Clin North Am. 2007 Oct;87(5):1149-77, x. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2007.08.001.
PMID: 17936480BACKGROUNDFrykberg RG. Epidemiology of the diabetic foot: ulcerations and amputations. Adv Wound Care. 1999 Apr;12(3):139-41. No abstract available.
PMID: 10655794BACKGROUNDSussman C, Bates-Jensen B. Wound Care - A Collaborative Practice Manual for Health Professionals. 3rd Ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006.
BACKGROUNDHess CT. Wound Care. 5th Ed ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005.
BACKGROUNDSteed DL, Attinger C, Colaizzi T, Crossland M, Franz M, Harkless L, Johnson A, Moosa H, Robson M, Serena T, Sheehan P, Veves A, Wiersma-Bryant L. Guidelines for the treatment of diabetic ulcers. Wound Repair Regen. 2006 Nov-Dec;14(6):680-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2006.00176.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 17199833BACKGROUNDAgren MS. An amorphous hydrogel enhances epithelialisation of wounds. Acta Derm Venereol. 1998 Mar;78(2):119-22. doi: 10.1080/000155598433449.
PMID: 9534889BACKGROUNDWhitney J, Phillips L, Aslam R, Barbul A, Gottrup F, Gould L, Robson MC, Rodeheaver G, Thomas D, Stotts N. Guidelines for the treatment of pressure ulcers. Wound Repair Regen. 2006 Nov-Dec;14(6):663-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2006.00175.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 17199832BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jaime Dickerson, PhD
- Organization
- Smith & Nephew Biotherapeutics
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Innes Cargill, PhD
Healthpoint, Ltd
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 27, 2009
First Posted
September 3, 2009
Study Start
September 1, 2009
Primary Completion
January 1, 2011
Study Completion
January 1, 2011
Last Updated
January 27, 2014
Results First Posted
January 27, 2014
Record last verified: 2013-12