NCT00969735

Brief Summary

This is a prospective single-center randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of PV cryoablation with the Arctic Front® catheter versus the standard PV isolation using radiofrequency irrigated tip catheters. The efficacy of both strategies will be evaluated from a clinical point of view and from the detection and quantification of AF episodes by means of the Reveal XT® implantable loop recorder.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_4 atrial-fibrillation

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2009

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2009

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 28, 2009

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 1, 2009

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

April 4, 2013

Status Verified

April 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

August 28, 2009

Last Update Submit

April 1, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

Atrial fibrillationCatheter ablationCryoenergyImplantable loop recorderPulmonary vein

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Proportion of patients without AF recurrences longer than 2 minutes

    At the 12th month from ablation (using a blanking period of 3 months following ablation)

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Time to first AF recurrence longer than 2 minutes

    Within the first 12 months from ablation (using a blanking period of 3 months following ablation, and without the use of any blanking period)

  • Cumulative burden of AF (number of AF episodes longer than 2 minutes)

    At the 12th month from ablation (using a blanking period of 3 months following ablation)

  • Cumulative burden of AF (percentage of time in AF)

    At the 12th month from ablation (using a blanking period of 3 months following ablation)

  • Proportion of patients with episodes of regular atrial tachycardia or atrial flutter requiring treatment with drugs, electrical cardioversion or ablation.

    Within the first 12 months from ablation

  • Quality of Life and symptom status

    At the 12th month from ablation

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Cryoablation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Deflectable over-the-wire cryoablation balloon catheter (Arctic Front®, Cryocath Technologies)

Device: Pulmonary vein cryoablation

Radiofrequency ablation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Open irrigation ablation catheter (Navistar® Thermo-cool®, Biosense Webster Inc).

Device: Pulmonary vein radiofrequency ablation

Interventions

A deflectable over-the-wire cryoablation balloon catheter (Arctic Front®) will be inflated and be positioned at each PV antrum. Then, cryoenergy will be delivered for 300 seconds. During cryoablation of the right PVs, the right phrenic nerve integrity will be monitored by the observation of right hemi-diaphragm contractions in response to right phrenic nerve pacing at the superior vena cava. Once the 4 PVs are cryoablated, the Arctic Front® catheter will be replaced by a decapolar PV mapping circular catheter (Lasso®, Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, California, EEUU) to evaluate PV conduction. A second cryoablation application may be delivered at each PV, if necessary. Crossover to RF ablation to complete PV isolation is discouraged.

Also known as: Cryoenergy balloon catheter ablation
Cryoablation

Ablation approach is ostial electrical isolation of all PVs with simultaneous use of the CARTO® electroanatomic mapping system (Biosense Webster, Tirat-Ha-Carmel, Israel). PV isolation will be performed by delivering RF energy at ostial sites with earliest PV potentials. Flow rate during the RF applications will be set at 15 mL/min (baseline 2 mL/min). Temperature and power limits will be set at 45ºC and 35 W. It will be allowed a 5 W reduction in power limit setting for small PVs (angiographic supero-inferior diameter \> 12 mm), and a 5 W increase in areas located away from the esophagus, and for focal applications at sites resistant to ablation or recurrent gaps. The end-point of ablation will be to achieve bidirectional PV conduction block.

Also known as: Pulmonary vein isolation
Radiofrequency ablation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Symptomatic recurrent paroxysmal AF (\>2 episodes in the last 6 months), and
  • Refractory to one or more class I or III antiarrhythmic drugs, and
  • PV anatomy consisting of 4 single PV, with the long diameter of the right superior PV ostium ≤ 20 mm.

You may not qualify if:

  • Age: \< 18 or \> 75 year-old
  • Prior AF ablation
  • Pregnancy
  • Concomitant acute illness
  • Hyperthyroidism
  • Moderate to severe valvular heart disease
  • Prior cardiac surgery
  • Left atrium \> 50 mm (anteroposterior diameter, parasternal long-axis view)
  • Intracardiac thrombus
  • Contraindications for anticoagulant therapy
  • Inability to be followed in our center for at least 1 year

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Unidad de Arritmias, Hospital Clínico San Carlos

Madrid, Madrid, 28040, Spain

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Arrhythmias, CardiacHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Nicasio Pérez Castellano, MD, PhD

    Unidad de Arritmias, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD, PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 28, 2009

First Posted

September 1, 2009

Study Start

July 1, 2009

Primary Completion

May 1, 2012

Study Completion

May 1, 2012

Last Updated

April 4, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-04

Locations