Cryoenergy Or Radiofrequency for Pulmonary Vein Isolation
COR
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a prospective single-center randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of PV cryoablation with the Arctic Front® catheter versus the standard PV isolation using radiofrequency irrigated tip catheters. The efficacy of both strategies will be evaluated from a clinical point of view and from the detection and quantification of AF episodes by means of the Reveal XT® implantable loop recorder.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4 atrial-fibrillation
Started Jul 2009
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 28, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2012
CompletedApril 4, 2013
April 1, 2013
2.8 years
August 28, 2009
April 1, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of patients without AF recurrences longer than 2 minutes
At the 12th month from ablation (using a blanking period of 3 months following ablation)
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Time to first AF recurrence longer than 2 minutes
Within the first 12 months from ablation (using a blanking period of 3 months following ablation, and without the use of any blanking period)
Cumulative burden of AF (number of AF episodes longer than 2 minutes)
At the 12th month from ablation (using a blanking period of 3 months following ablation)
Cumulative burden of AF (percentage of time in AF)
At the 12th month from ablation (using a blanking period of 3 months following ablation)
Proportion of patients with episodes of regular atrial tachycardia or atrial flutter requiring treatment with drugs, electrical cardioversion or ablation.
Within the first 12 months from ablation
Quality of Life and symptom status
At the 12th month from ablation
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Cryoablation
ACTIVE COMPARATORDeflectable over-the-wire cryoablation balloon catheter (Arctic Front®, Cryocath Technologies)
Radiofrequency ablation
ACTIVE COMPARATOROpen irrigation ablation catheter (Navistar® Thermo-cool®, Biosense Webster Inc).
Interventions
A deflectable over-the-wire cryoablation balloon catheter (Arctic Front®) will be inflated and be positioned at each PV antrum. Then, cryoenergy will be delivered for 300 seconds. During cryoablation of the right PVs, the right phrenic nerve integrity will be monitored by the observation of right hemi-diaphragm contractions in response to right phrenic nerve pacing at the superior vena cava. Once the 4 PVs are cryoablated, the Arctic Front® catheter will be replaced by a decapolar PV mapping circular catheter (Lasso®, Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, California, EEUU) to evaluate PV conduction. A second cryoablation application may be delivered at each PV, if necessary. Crossover to RF ablation to complete PV isolation is discouraged.
Ablation approach is ostial electrical isolation of all PVs with simultaneous use of the CARTO® electroanatomic mapping system (Biosense Webster, Tirat-Ha-Carmel, Israel). PV isolation will be performed by delivering RF energy at ostial sites with earliest PV potentials. Flow rate during the RF applications will be set at 15 mL/min (baseline 2 mL/min). Temperature and power limits will be set at 45ºC and 35 W. It will be allowed a 5 W reduction in power limit setting for small PVs (angiographic supero-inferior diameter \> 12 mm), and a 5 W increase in areas located away from the esophagus, and for focal applications at sites resistant to ablation or recurrent gaps. The end-point of ablation will be to achieve bidirectional PV conduction block.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Symptomatic recurrent paroxysmal AF (\>2 episodes in the last 6 months), and
- Refractory to one or more class I or III antiarrhythmic drugs, and
- PV anatomy consisting of 4 single PV, with the long diameter of the right superior PV ostium ≤ 20 mm.
You may not qualify if:
- Age: \< 18 or \> 75 year-old
- Prior AF ablation
- Pregnancy
- Concomitant acute illness
- Hyperthyroidism
- Moderate to severe valvular heart disease
- Prior cardiac surgery
- Left atrium \> 50 mm (anteroposterior diameter, parasternal long-axis view)
- Intracardiac thrombus
- Contraindications for anticoagulant therapy
- Inability to be followed in our center for at least 1 year
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Hospital San Carlos, Madridlead
- Spanish Society of Cardiologycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Unidad de Arritmias, Hospital Clínico San Carlos
Madrid, Madrid, 28040, Spain
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nicasio Pérez Castellano, MD, PhD
Unidad de Arritmias, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 28, 2009
First Posted
September 1, 2009
Study Start
July 1, 2009
Primary Completion
May 1, 2012
Study Completion
May 1, 2012
Last Updated
April 4, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-04