NCT00965562

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of calcium carbonate to fluoxetine in the treatment of moderate to severe PMS. Second, to compare each active agent to a placebo control. Third, to evaluate the efficacy of each treatment for specific symptom clusters (i.e. affective and somatic). Fourth, to determine whether the addition of calcium to on going fluoxetine treatment leads to additional therapeutic benefit.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
49

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2000

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2000

Completed
9 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 24, 2009

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 25, 2009

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2010

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2010

Completed
4.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 26, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

March 23, 2015

Status Verified

February 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

9.8 years

First QC Date

August 24, 2009

Results QC Date

July 2, 2013

Last Update Submit

March 3, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

Premenstrual syndromePMScalcium

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Comparison of the Change in IDS Symptom Scores Among Groups

    IDS = Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology: measures depressive symptoms during the previous premenstrual phase with high internal consistency: sum of responses to 28 of 30 possible items each scored 0 to 3 points with total scoring (0=no symptoms, 84=most severe). This outcome is a measure of effect size between the two trial groups and the placebo group, with the placebo effect size value used as a reference.

    over duration of treatment, 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit

  • Comparison of the Change in PMTS Symptom Scores Among Groups

    PMTS = Premenstrual Tension Syndrome (Observer Rating) Scale: a clinician-administered retrospective scale developed for the study of PMS, a sum of responses to 10 items each with 4 points (0=no symptoms, 40=most severe). This outcome is a measure of effect size between the two trial groups and the placebo group, with the placebo effect size value used as a reference.

    over duration of treatment, 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit

  • Comparison of the Change in CGI-S Symptom Scores Among Groups

    CGI-S = Clinical Global Impression-Severity: a severity scale widely used in psychopharmacology research (1=normal not at all ill, 7=among most extremely ill). This outcome is a measure of effect size between the two trial groups and the placebo group, with the placebo effect size value used as a reference.

    over duration of treatment, 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit

  • Comparison of the Change in DRSP Symptom Scores Among Groups

    DRSP = Daily Record of Severity of Problems, which combines responses to 21 items each with scale: 1=no symptoms, 6=extreme. This outcome is a measure of effect size between the two trial groups and the placebo group, with the placebo effect size value used as a reference.

    over duration of treatment, 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit

  • Comparison of the Change in CGI Improvement Scores Among Groups

    CGI-I = Clinical Global Impression Improvement: the improvement subscale of CGI measuring change at each visit as compared to visit 1 (1=very much improved, 7=very much worse). This outcome is a measure of effect size between the two trial groups and the placebo group, with the placebo effect size value used as a reference.

    over duration of treatment, 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Proportion of Participants With DRSP LOCF Response to Treatment (50% Improvement)

    over duration of treatment, 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit

  • Proportion of Participants With IDS LOCF Response to Treatment (50% Improvement)

    over duration of treatment, 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit

  • Proportion of Participants With PMTS LOCF Response to Treatment (50% Improvement)

    over duration of treatment, 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit

  • Proportion of Participants With DRSP Visit-wise Response to Treatment (50% Improvement)

    over duration of treatment from baseline to visit 5, including 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit

  • Proportion of Patients With IDS Visit-wise Response to Treatment (50% Improvement)

    over duration of treatment from baseline to visit 5, including 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

I

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Fluoxetine

Drug: Fluoxetine

II

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Calcium

Drug: Calcium

III

PLACEBO COMPARATOR
Drug: Placebo

Interventions

Fluoxetine 20 mg per day for 4 menstrual cycles. For the fifth menstrual cycle, all women will receive calcium. Women on Fluoxetine will continue taking it in addition to 1200mg of calcium.

Also known as: Prozac
I

1200 mg of calcium to be taken for 5 menstrual cycles.

II

For 5 cycles, women will receive placebo. At the end of the fourth cycle, all women will receive 1200 mg of calcium in addition to the placebo medication.

III

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 48 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Female outpatients between the ages of 18 and 48 who are:
  • Menstruating
  • Meet criteria for moderate to severe PMS
  • Report PMS symptoms for at least 9 our of the 12 months prior to screening; 4) \*Are using an adequate method of birth control.

You may not qualify if:

  • Any candidate who:
  • Fulfills MINI (DSM-IV) criteria for a serious AXIS 1 disorder
  • Fulfills DSM-IV criteria during the charting phase consistent with a diagnosis of psychotic disorder, bipolar disorder or major depressive disorder
  • Has a severe, co-existing condition that, in the investigator's opinion, renders the patient unsuitable for the study
  • Poses a significant risk of suicide
  • Takes ongoing medication that could treat PMS symptoms
  • Has a history of hypersensitivity or adverse reaction to fluoxetine or calcium
  • Is lactating, pregnant or is planning to become pregnant during the course of the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Yale School of Medicine

New Haven, Connecticut, 06510, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Premenstrual Syndrome

Interventions

FluoxetineCalcium

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Menstruation DisturbancesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PropylaminesAminesOrganic ChemicalsMetals, Alkaline EarthElementsInorganic ChemicalsMetalsBlood Coagulation FactorsBiological Factors

Limitations and Caveats

small sample size

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Kimberly Yonkers
Organization
Donaghue Medical Research Foundation

Study Officials

  • Kimberly A Yonkers, MD

    Yale University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 24, 2009

First Posted

August 25, 2009

Study Start

September 1, 2000

Primary Completion

June 1, 2010

Study Completion

October 1, 2010

Last Updated

March 23, 2015

Results First Posted

February 26, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-02

Locations