Chicago Social Drinking Project
CSDP
Individual Differences After Consumption of Alcohol and Other Common Substances and Long-Term Follow-Up of Social Drinking, Young Adults
2 other identifiers
interventional
800
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study attempts to elucidate the factors that contribute to escalation and maintenance of excessive ethanol drinking in young adults by:
- 1.Examining subjective and objective response differences to alcohol and other common substances in a sample of adults with varying consumption patterns.
- 2.Determining whether response to alcohol and other substances is predictive of future consumption patterns through longitudinal follow-up interviews.
- 3.Examining the relationship between responses to alcohol and other substances at baseline and re-examination testing to evaluate if consumption patterns moderate this relationship.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2004
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 11, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 19, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2027
April 9, 2026
April 1, 2026
22.5 years
August 11, 2009
April 3, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Subjective response to alcohol and other common substances utilizing mood questionnaires in adult drinkers
Measured during 5 timepoints at each experimental session: 1) Pre-drink baseline, 2) +30 minutes, 3) +60 minutes, 4) +120 minutes, and 5) +180 minutes following the initiation of beverage consumption
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Substance Use Behavior Reported During Follow-Up Interviews
Measured at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months following the final experimental session
Study Arms (6)
Beverage with Heavy Alcohol Dose
EXPERIMENTALBeverage containing 0.8 g/kg alcohol
Beverage with Low Alcohol Dose
EXPERIMENTALBeverage containing 0.4 g/kg alcohol
Beverage with No alcohol (Placebo)
PLACEBO COMPARATORBeverage containing 0.0 g/kg alcohol to act as placebo
Beverage with Diphenhydramine
EXPERIMENTALBeverage containing 1.5 standard dose of Diphenhydramine (Benadryl)
Beverage with Caffeine
EXPERIMENTALBeverage containing the equivalent of 1.5 times participant's average caffeine consumption
Beverage in Natural Environment
NO INTERVENTIONParticipant consumes alcohol containing beverages or non-alcohol beverages in natural environment
Interventions
Beverage containing 0.8 g/kg ethanol, 0.4 g/kg ethanol
Beverage containing dose equivalent to 1.5 standard doses of Diphenhydramine (Benadryl)
Beverage containing the equivalent of 1.5 times the participant's daily caffeine intake
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 21-65
- Weigh between 110-210 lbs
- Drink alcohol at least once weekly with weekly "binge" drinking episodes
- Available to complete in-person screening and 2, 4 hour experimental sessions at the University of Chicago
- Available by phone, mail, or Internet for follow-up interviews for at least 2 years following sessions
You may not qualify if:
- Current or past major medical or psychiatric disorders including alcohol and substance dependence
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Clinical Addictions Research Laboratory
Chicago, Illinois, 60637, United States
Related Publications (12)
King AC, Byars JA. Alcohol-induced performance impairment in heavy episodic and light social drinkers. J Stud Alcohol. 2004 Jan;65(1):27-36. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2004.65.27.
PMID: 15000501BACKGROUNDKing AC, Houle T, de Wit H, Holdstock L, Schuster A. Biphasic alcohol response differs in heavy versus light drinkers. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2002 Jun;26(6):827-35.
PMID: 12068251BACKGROUNDRueger SY, McNamara PJ, King AC. Expanding the utility of the Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale (BAES) and initial psychometric support for the Brief-BAES (B-BAES). Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2009 May;33(5):916-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2009.00914.x. Epub 2009 Mar 11.
PMID: 19320625RESULTEpstein AM, Sher TG, Young MA, King AC. Tobacco chippers show robust increases in smoking urge after alcohol consumption. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007 Feb;190(3):321-9. doi: 10.1007/s00213-006-0438-8. Epub 2006 Jun 28.
PMID: 16804691RESULTBrumback T, Cao D, King A. Effects of alcohol on psychomotor performance and perceived impairment in heavy binge social drinkers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007 Nov 2;91(1):10-7. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.04.013. Epub 2007 Jun 8.
PMID: 17560739RESULTKing A, Epstein A, Conrad M, McNamara P, Cao D. Sex differences in the relationship between alcohol-associated smoking urge and behavior: a pilot study. Am J Addict. 2008 Sep-Oct;17(5):347-53. doi: 10.1080/10550490802268140.
PMID: 18770076RESULTKing AC, Epstein AM. Alcohol dose-dependent increases in smoking urge in light smokers. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2005 Apr;29(4):547-52. doi: 10.1097/01.alc.0000158839.65251.fe.
PMID: 15834219RESULTKing A, Vena A, Hasin DS, deWit H, O'Connor SJ, Cao D. Subjective Responses to Alcohol in the Development and Maintenance of Alcohol Use Disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2021 Jun;178(6):560-571. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.20030247. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
PMID: 33397141RESULTKing AC, Cao D, deWit H, O'Connor SJ, Hasin DS. The role of alcohol response phenotypes in the risk for alcohol use disorder. BJPsych Open. 2019 Apr 22;5(3):e38. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2019.18.
PMID: 31685074DERIVEDKing AC, Hasin D, O'Connor SJ, McNamara PJ, Cao D. A Prospective 5-Year Re-examination of Alcohol Response in Heavy Drinkers Progressing in Alcohol Use Disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2016 Mar 15;79(6):489-98. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.05.007. Epub 2015 May 14.
PMID: 26117308DERIVEDKing AC, McNamara PJ, Hasin DS, Cao D. Alcohol challenge responses predict future alcohol use disorder symptoms: a 6-year prospective study. Biol Psychiatry. 2014 May 15;75(10):798-806. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.08.001. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
PMID: 24094754DERIVEDKing AC, de Wit H, McNamara PJ, Cao D. Rewarding, stimulant, and sedative alcohol responses and relationship to future binge drinking. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011 Apr;68(4):389-99. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.26.
PMID: 21464363DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andrea C King, PhD
University of Chicago
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 11, 2009
First Posted
August 19, 2009
Study Start
March 1, 2004
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2027
Last Updated
April 9, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04