Comparing Two Types of Swabs in Collecting Cell Samples for Anal Pap Tests and Human Papillomavirus Tests in Men Who Have Sex With Men
Comparison of Flocked vs. Dacron Swab for Anal Cytology, Correspondence With High Resolution Anoscopy
3 other identifiers
interventional
48
1 country
1
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Doctors use a swab to collect cell samples when testing for anal cancer and human papillomavirus. It is not yet known which type of swab is more effective in collecting cell samples for anal Pap tests and human papillomavirus tests in men who have sex with men. PURPOSE: This clinical trial is comparing two types of swabs in collecting cell samples for anal Pap tests and human papillomavirus tests in men who have sex with men.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2009
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 12, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 7, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 10, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 12, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 14, 2016
CompletedAugust 3, 2020
September 1, 2016
2.8 years
August 7, 2009
July 30, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of anal cytology screening outcome derived from specimens collected by a flocked nylon swab vs a Dacron swab
a day
Study Arms (1)
swab test
OTHERInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- HIV-infected or -uninfected adult men who have sex with men
- Concurrent enrollment in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study required
You may not qualify if:
- history of anal perforation or other medical contraindications
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UCLA
Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States
Related Publications (1)
Wiley DJ, Hsu H, Bolan R, Voskanian A, Elashoff D, Young S, Dayrit R, Barman P, DeAzambuja K, Masongsong EV, Martinez-Maza O, Detels R. Comparison of 2 anal cytology protocols to predict high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2013 Oct;17(4):414-24. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e318281d36e.
PMID: 23595039DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dorothy Wiley, Ph.D. RN
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 7, 2009
First Posted
August 10, 2009
Study Start
March 12, 2009
Primary Completion
December 12, 2011
Study Completion
October 14, 2016
Last Updated
August 3, 2020
Record last verified: 2016-09