Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for the Treatment of Apathy in Parkinson's Disease
ReStore
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this research study is to attempt to treat apathy in Parkinson's disease (PD) using high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the brain and to investigate the patterns of brain activation that may be involved in apathy. It is hypothesized that high-frequency rTMS of the left mid-dorsolateral frontal cortex will improve apathy in PD.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2007
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 5, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 7, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 20, 2012
CompletedApril 26, 2013
September 1, 2012
2.5 years
August 5, 2009
December 5, 2011
April 19, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES)
The apathy evaluation scale is a 14-item self-report questionaire that provides a quantitative estimate of apathy symptoms. Items are given a score of 0-3, and a total score is summated using all items. Scores may range between 0 and 42. Higher scores are indicative of greater symptoms of apathy, and a score of 14 is suggestive of clinically significant symptoms.
Pre-Tx; 10 days post tx
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Lille Apathy Rating Scale (LARS)
Pre-Tx; 10 days post-tx
Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II)
Pre-Tx; 10 days post-tx
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D)
Pre-Tx; 10 days post-tx
Study Arms (2)
High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magentic Stimulation
EXPERIMENTALHigh-Frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation patients randomized to this treatment will receive left prefrontal rTMS, each treatment will consist of 2000 stimuli (50 - 8-second trains of 40 stimuli at 5 Hz). We will administer rTMS trains every 30 seconds for 25 minutes. Stimulus intensity for the first and second trains will be 80 and 90% of Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) threshold, respectively.
Sham Repetitive Transcranial Magentic Stimulation
SHAM COMPARATORSham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation patients randomized to receive the sham rTMS will undergo the same procedure for identifying stimulus location used in patients receiving real rTMS. Simulated rTMS will be administered using Magstim Placebo 70 mm figure-of-8 shaped coils which produce discharge noise and vibration similar to a real 70 mm coil without stimulating the cerebral cortex. However, in addition to obvious coil discharge noise, rTMS also causes electrical stimulation of the scalp. We will simulate this experience by attaching surface electrodes underneath the sham coil and in contact with the scalp.
Interventions
In patients randomized to receive left prefrontal rTMS, each treatment will consist of 2000 stimuli (50 - 8-second trains of 40 stimuli at 5 Hz). We will administer rTMS trains every 30 seconds for 25 minutes. Stimulus intensity for the first and second trains will be 80 and 90% of MEP threshold, respectively.
Patients randomized to receive sham rTMS will undergo the same procedure for identifying stimulus location used in patients receiving real rTMS. Simulated rTMS will be administered using Magstim Placebo 70 mm figure-of-8 shaped coils which produce discharge noise and vibration similar to a real 70 mm coil without stimulating the cerebral cortex. However, in addition to obvious coil discharge noise, rTMS also causes electrical stimulation of the scalp. We will simulate this experience by attaching surface electrodes underneath the sham coil and in contact with the scalp.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- diagnosis of "probable" PD, defined by the presence of at least 2 out of 3 cardinal motor features of PD (resting tremor, rigidity, and bradykinesia, plus a sustained and significant response to dopaminergic treatment);
- age 30 or over; and
- on stable medications for at least 30 days.
You may not qualify if:
- features suggestive of other causes of parkinsonism/ parkinson-plus syndromes;
- history of deep brain stimulation or ablation surgery, significant headaches, epilepsy or seizure disorder, mass brain lesions, or major head trauma leading to loss of consciousness of any length;
- family (1st degree relatives) history of epilepsy;
- evidence for dementia;
- presence of contraindications for functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI);
- history of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, other psychosis, rapid-cycling bipolar illness, alcohol/drug abuse within the past year;
- need for rapid clinical response due to conditions such as initiation, psychosis, or suicidality;
- unstable medical condition such as diabetes, cardiac disease, hypertension;
- pregnancy; and
- colorblindness.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, 32611, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Due to recruiting difficulties, only 24 participants completed study participation. Despite this, the investigators still had significant power to examine effects of interest.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Hubert Fernandez
- Organization
- Center for Neurological Restoration Cleveland Clinic
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hubert H Fernandez, M.D.
University of Florida
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 5, 2009
First Posted
August 7, 2009
Study Start
April 1, 2007
Primary Completion
October 1, 2009
Study Completion
December 1, 2009
Last Updated
April 26, 2013
Results First Posted
February 20, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-09