NCT00954330

Brief Summary

The aim of this prospective randomized controlled trial was to compare the effectiveness of surgical and conservative treatment in acute lateral ligament injury of ankle. The more detailed aims were to assess the function, physical activity level, re-injuries, objective stability and radiographic changes seen by magnetic resonance imaging in patients randomized to surgery or to functional treatment after a mean of 14 years follow-up.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
51

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 1991

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 1991

Completed
17.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2008

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2008

Completed
8 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 6, 2009

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 7, 2009

Completed
Last Updated

August 7, 2009

Status Verified

August 1, 2009

Enrollment Period

17.8 years

First QC Date

August 6, 2009

Last Update Submit

August 6, 2009

Conditions

Keywords

rct, intervention, surgery, lateral ligament injury of the ankleREturn to pre-injury level

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The main outcome measure in the present study was a validated ankle injury scoring scale, A Performance Test Protocol and Scoring Scale for the Evaluation of Ankle Injuries.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Return to pre-injury level in physical activity, re-injuries of the same ankle, visits to physician due to the same ankle, range of joint motion, subjective satisfaction and complications were measured

Study Arms (2)

surgery

EXPERIMENTAL

All twenty-five patients underwent ligament repair, where the ruptured ends of the FTA (in 11 cases) or FTA and FC (in 14 cases) ligaments were rejoined by using absorbable sutures. A supine position and a tourniquet were used. A curvilinear skin incision of 5-10 cm was made; the retinacular structures were incised and the hematoma was removed.

Procedure: lateral ligament surgery

functional treatment

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Twenty-six patients randomized to the functional treatment received a functional light-weight orthotic device (Air-Cast ankle brace, Summit, New Jersey) for 3 weeks. Full weight bearing was allowed. The ankle brace allowed dorsi- and plantarflexion but it restricted inversion and eversion of the ankle

Device: functional treatment

Interventions

. The disrupted FTA or/and FC and superficial retinacular structures were repaired by using absorbable sutures. In case of avulsion from the bone, the ligament was reapproximated with the use of sutures that were passed through 2.0 millimeter drill-holes in the bone.

surgery

Twenty-six patients randomized to the functional treatment received a functional light-weight orthotic device (Air-Cast ankle brace, Summit, New Jersey) for 3 weeks. Full weight bearing was allowed. The ankle brace allowed dorsi- and plantarflexion but it restricted inversion and eversion of the ankle.

functional treatment

Eligibility Criteria

Age19 Years - 25 Years
Sexmale
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • The positive findings for a lateral ligament injury included a clinically unstable ankle and a radiological talar tilt \>6 degrees or ADS \>5 mm compared with the uninjured opposite ankle.

You may not qualify if:

  • In addition, patients were excluded from our study if they had previously undergone surgery of the ankle region.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Central military hospital

Helsinki, 00301, Finland

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Ankle Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Leg InjuriesWounds and Injuries

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 6, 2009

First Posted

August 7, 2009

Study Start

February 1, 1991

Primary Completion

December 1, 2008

Study Completion

December 1, 2008

Last Updated

August 7, 2009

Record last verified: 2009-08

Locations