Study Stopped
PI left institution
Comparison of Oral Gabapentin and Pregabalin in Postoperative Pain Control After Photorefractive Keratectomy
1 other identifier
interventional
8
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Purpose: To compare the efficacy of oral gabapentin and its newer analogue pregabalin in postoperative pain control after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Methods: One hundred and four patients who meet the inclusion criteria undergoing PRK in one or both eyes will be randomized into one of two treatment groups. Those in group A will be treated with gabapentin, and those in group B will be treated with pregabalin to control postoperative PRK pain. Patients in both groups will begin treatment two hours prior to surgery in order to achieve therapeutic blood levels of each medication. After surgery the patients will assess their pain level using the visual analogue scale (VAS) at different intervals of time - one hour after surgery, the evening of the surgery, and three times each day for three subsequent days. Patients will also daily assess their level of somnolence using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and record the presence of dizziness for the same amount of time. On the fourth day they will return to clinic for a postoperative appointment. At that time the pain, sleepiness, and dizziness assessment scales will be collected and analyzed. The patients will return one month later to further assess long-term pain and healing after PRK. Results: Both gabapentin and pregabalin have been shown in previous studies to treat postoperative pain effectively. The effects of gabapentin 300 mg TID for 3 days versus pregabalin 50 mg TID for 3 days on decreasing overall postoperative pain following PRK will be presented. Conclusion: The effectiveness of the two different treatment medications will be analyzed, and the conclusion will be based on the results.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable postoperative-pain
Started Nov 2009
Longer than P75 for not_applicable postoperative-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 5, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 7, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 25, 2014
CompletedJanuary 9, 2017
November 1, 2016
2.8 years
August 5, 2009
September 18, 2014
November 18, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Decreased Overall Pain Score as Measured by the Visual Analogue Scale
No data was collected or analyzed. No study procedures were performed.
one month
Study Arms (2)
Gabapentin
EXPERIMENTALNeurontin
Pregabalin
EXPERIMENTALLyrica
Interventions
Gabapentin - 300 mg three times a day starting two hours prior to surgery and will continue for a total of four days
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age or older
- Undergoing PRK in at least one eye
You may not qualify if:
- Serious medical problems within the last 6 months including myocardial infarction (heart attack), congestive heart failure, stroke, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and other conditions, etc.
- Serious kidney disease as evidenced by the need for dialysis or kidney transplant.
- History of seizure or other neurologic disorders.
- Patients intending to become pregnant or who are pregnant or nursing over the projected course of treatment.
- Currently taking gabapentin or pregabalin for other medical purposes.
- Known allergic reaction to gabapentin or pregabalin from previous use.
- Plans to move out of the area within 8 weeks after the surgery.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Loma Linda University - Ophthalmology
Loma Linda, California, 92354, United States
Related Publications (26)
Shortt AJ, Allan BD. Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) versus laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19;(2):CD005135. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005135.pub2.
PMID: 16625626BACKGROUNDAmbrosio R Jr, Wilson S. LASIK vs LASEK vs PRK: advantages and indications. Semin Ophthalmol. 2003 Mar;18(1):2-10. doi: 10.1076/soph.18.1.2.14074.
PMID: 12759854BACKGROUNDLee JB, Kim JS, Choe C, Seong GJ, Kim EK. Comparison of two procedures: photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2001 Sep-Oct;45(5):487-91. doi: 10.1016/s0021-5155(01)00406-3.
PMID: 11583670BACKGROUNDVan de Pol C, Greig JL, Estrada A, Bissette GM, Bower KS. Visual and flight performance recovery after PRK or LASIK in helicopter pilots. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2007 Jun;78(6):547-53.
PMID: 17571652BACKGROUNDWalker MB, Wilson SE. Recovery of uncorrected visual acuity after laser in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy for low myopia. Cornea. 2001 Mar;20(2):153-5. doi: 10.1097/00003226-200103000-00007.
PMID: 11248818BACKGROUNDSandoval HP, de Castro LE, Vroman DT, Solomon KD. Refractive Surgery Survey 2004. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Jan;31(1):221-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.08.047.
PMID: 15721716BACKGROUNDHazelrigg SR, Auer JE, Seifert PE. Experience in 100 transthoracic balloon pumps. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992 Sep;54(3):528-32. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(92)90448-d.
PMID: 1510521BACKGROUNDDirks J, Fredensborg BB, Christensen D, Fomsgaard JS, Flyger H, Dahl JB. A randomized study of the effects of single-dose gabapentin versus placebo on postoperative pain and morphine consumption after mastectomy. Anesthesiology. 2002 Sep;97(3):560-4. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200209000-00007.
PMID: 12218520BACKGROUNDFassoulaki A, Patris K, Sarantopoulos C, Hogan Q. The analgesic effect of gabapentin and mexiletine after breast surgery for cancer. Anesth Analg. 2002 Oct;95(4):985-91, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200210000-00036.
PMID: 12351281BACKGROUNDPandey CK, Navkar DV, Giri PJ, Raza M, Behari S, Singh RB, Singh U, Singh PK. Evaluation of the optimal preemptive dose of gabapentin for postoperative pain relief after lumbar diskectomy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2005 Apr;17(2):65-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ana.0000151407.62650.51.
PMID: 15840990BACKGROUNDTuran A, Karamanlioglu B, Memis D, Hamamcioglu MK, Tukenmez B, Pamukcu Z, Kurt I. Analgesic effects of gabapentin after spinal surgery. Anesthesiology. 2004 Apr;100(4):935-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200404000-00025.
PMID: 15087630BACKGROUNDTuran A, Memis D, Karamanlioglu B, Yagiz R, Pamukcu Z, Yavuz E. The analgesic effects of gabapentin in monitored anesthesia care for ear-nose-throat surgery. Anesth Analg. 2004 Aug;99(2):375-8, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000136646.11737.7B.
PMID: 15271709BACKGROUNDMenigaux C, Adam F, Guignard B, Sessler DI, Chauvin M. Preoperative gabapentin decreases anxiety and improves early functional recovery from knee surgery. Anesth Analg. 2005 May;100(5):1394-1399. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000152010.74739.B8.
PMID: 15845693BACKGROUNDKavalieratos CS, Dimou T. Gabapentin therapy for painful, blind glaucomatous eye: case report. Pain Med. 2008 Apr;9(3):377-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2006.00167.x.
PMID: 18366517BACKGROUNDPoujois A, Vidailhet M, Trocello JM, Bourdain F, Gaymard B, Rivaud-Pechoux S. Effect of gabapentin on oculomotor control and parkinsonism in patients with progressive supranuclear palsy. Eur J Neurol. 2007 Sep;14(9):1060-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2007.01687.x.
PMID: 17718702BACKGROUNDRahman W, Proudlock F, Gottlob I. Oral gabapentin treatment for symptomatic Heimann-Bielschowsky phenomenon. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Jan;141(1):221-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.08.022.
PMID: 16387013BACKGROUNDChoudhuri I, Sarvananthan N, Gottlob I. Survey of management of acquired nystagmus in the United Kingdom. Eye (Lond). 2007 Sep;21(9):1194-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702434. Epub 2006 May 26.
PMID: 16732211BACKGROUNDNissman SA, Tractenberg RE, Babbar-Goel A, Pasternak JF. Oral gabapentin for the treatment of postoperative pain after photorefractive keratectomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 Apr;145(4):623-629. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.11.012. Epub 2008 Jan 28.
PMID: 18226799BACKGROUNDAgarwal A, Gautam S, Gupta D, Agarwal S, Singh PK, Singh U. Evaluation of a single preoperative dose of pregabalin for attenuation of postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Nov;101(5):700-4. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen244. Epub 2008 Aug 20.
PMID: 18716003BACKGROUNDTaylor CP. Mechanisms of analgesia by gabapentin and pregabalin--calcium channel alpha2-delta [Cavalpha2-delta] ligands. Pain. 2009 Mar;142(1-2):13-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.11.019. Epub 2009 Jan 6. No abstract available.
PMID: 19128880BACKGROUNDGuay DR. Pregabalin in neuropathic pain: a more "pharmaceutically elegant" gabapentin? Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2005 Dec;3(4):274-87.
PMID: 16503325BACKGROUNDLesser H, Sharma U, LaMoreaux L, Poole RM. Pregabalin relieves symptoms of painful diabetic neuropathy: a randomized controlled trial. Neurology. 2004 Dec 14;63(11):2104-10. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000145767.36287.a1.
PMID: 15596757BACKGROUNDRichter RW, Portenoy R, Sharma U, Lamoreaux L, Bockbrader H, Knapp LE. Relief of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy with pregabalin: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Pain. 2005 Apr;6(4):253-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2004.12.007.
PMID: 15820913BACKGROUNDHuskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet. 1974 Nov 9;2(7889):1127-31. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)90884-8. No abstract available.
PMID: 4139420BACKGROUNDScott J, Huskisson EC. Graphic representation of pain. Pain. 1976 Jun;2(2):175-84. No abstract available.
PMID: 1026900BACKGROUNDRevill SI, Robinson JO, Rosen M, Hogg MI. The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain. Anaesthesia. 1976 Nov;31(9):1191-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1976.tb11971.x.
PMID: 1015603BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Julio Narvaez, MD
- Organization
- Loma Linda University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Julio Narvaez, MD
Loma Linda University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 5, 2009
First Posted
August 7, 2009
Study Start
November 1, 2009
Primary Completion
September 1, 2012
Study Completion
April 1, 2013
Last Updated
January 9, 2017
Results First Posted
September 25, 2014
Record last verified: 2016-11