Is Plasma Transfusion Beneficial Prior to Low-Risk Procedures in Hospitalized Patients With Blood Clotting Abnormalities?
Restrictive Versus Liberal Fresh Frozen Plasma Transfusion Prior to Low-Risk Invasive Procedures in Hospitalized Patients.
1 other identifier
interventional
2
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Blood clotting abnormalities or problems that happen during surgery ? even minor surgery ? are serious because of the possibility of serious bleeding that cannot be stopped. The current standard practice for people with clotting abnormalities is to transfuse additional blood before the surgery, in an effort to decrease bleeding problems. However, transfusing blood before the surgery is not very effective in decreasing bleeding complications. In addition, it may be associated with other complications, including fluid buildup and swelling in the lungs. For this study, a person with a mild clotting problem is defined as one with an INR (International Normalized Ratio) between 1.5 and 3. Severe clotting is defined as an INR greater than 3. This study will aim to test if limiting or restricting transfusion for those patients with severe clotting problems (an INR greater than 3) will result in fewer transfusion problems and fewer unnecessary transfusions in comparison with the current, more liberal, transfusion use for all patients with both mild and severe clotting problems (an INR greater than 1.5).The investigators will also determine if liberal blood transfusion decreases the risk of bleeding after surgical procedures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Jul 2006
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 4, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 6, 2009
CompletedNovember 16, 2009
November 1, 2009
1.4 years
August 4, 2009
November 13, 2009
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
New onset pulmonary edema
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Postprocedural bleeding complications
Number of blood product transfusions
Hospital mortality
Length of intensive care unit and hospital stay
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Consenting hospitalized adult
- (\>18 years)
- Patients with abnormal INR (INR 1.6-3) due to either vitamin K depletion or antagonism (Coumadin and/or broad spectrum antibiotics) or liver insufficiency
- Patients who are about to undergo one of the three common minimally invasive procedures (thoracocentesis, abdominal paracentesis, and central vein cannulation)
You may not qualify if:
- None
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mayo Cliniclead
Study Sites (1)
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 4, 2009
First Posted
August 6, 2009
Study Start
July 1, 2006
Primary Completion
December 1, 2007
Study Completion
December 1, 2008
Last Updated
November 16, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-11