Laryngeal Morbidity After Endotracheal Intubation - Endoflex-tube Versus Use of Stylet
1 other identifier
interventional
130
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is aimed at reducing the risk of hoarseness and damage to the vocal cords following general anaesthesia. Conventional endotracheal intubation with use of a stylet will be compared with the Endoflex tube. A conventional stylet enforced endotracheal tube is dirigible because of the stiffness gained by the addition of a stylet. In high risk rapid sequence intubation settings the enhanced dirigibility can be crucial, which is why most anaesthesiologists choose to add the stylet in these situations. A new endotracheal tube with a dynamic dirigible end called the Endoflex tube might prove to be a good alternative to the conventional stylet enforced endotracheal tube. Study hypothesis: The Endoflex tube will reduce the risk of hoarseness after intubation when compared to the conventional stylet enforced endotracheal tube under optimal intubation conditions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2010
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 5, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 6, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2011
CompletedAugust 24, 2011
August 1, 2011
1.3 years
August 5, 2009
August 23, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Postoperative hoarseness
1 hr postoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (15)
Vocal cord sequelae
Preoperative - on average 12 hours before operation
Intubation conditions
During and after intubation - on average 5 minutes
Intubation difficulty scale
During and after intubation - on average 5 minutes
Voice Range Profile
72 hours postoperatively
Multi Dimensional Voice Profile
Preoperative - on average 12 hours before operation
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Endoflex tube
EXPERIMENTALUse of Endoflex tube for intubation.
Endotracheal tube with stylet
ACTIVE COMPARATORUse of conventional endotracheal tube with a stylet for intubation.
Interventions
Size decided upon gender.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Elective surgical patients who require an endotracheal tube during general anaesthesia.
- Informed consent.
- Legally competent.
- Be able to understand Danish and be able to read the given information in Danish.
You may not qualify if:
- Planned or former operation in or around the pharynx or the larynx.
- Cancer, infection or sequelae in or around the pharynx or the larynx.
- Use of a stomach tube before or during surgery.
- Suspected difficult intubation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Rigshospitalet, Denmarklead
- TrygFonden, Denmarkcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Lars Rasmussen, MD, PHD
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 5, 2009
First Posted
August 6, 2009
Study Start
April 1, 2010
Primary Completion
August 1, 2011
Study Completion
August 1, 2011
Last Updated
August 24, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-08