Comparison of Two Methods of Securing Skin Grafts Using Negative Pressure Wound Therapy: Vacuum Assisted Closure (VAC) and Gauze Suction (GSUC)
1 other identifier
interventional
104
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare how well two methods (VAC and G-SUC) of securing skin grafts using negative pressure wound therapy work. Negative pressure wound therapy is a commonly used method of applying suction on wounds to remove fluid from wound and to promote healing. The VAC system is widely used and consists of a foam dressing and a portable computerized suction pump. The G-SUC method uses commonly available dressing supplies attached to vacuum (suction) pump located on the wall above a hospital bed. The investigators have frequently used both methods over the past 10 years and have not observed any specific negative side effects of either.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started May 2009
Typical duration for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 31, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 4, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 24, 2015
CompletedSeptember 24, 2015
August 1, 2015
2.6 years
July 31, 2009
July 17, 2015
August 24, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Wounds With Complete Skin Graft Take
For each wound, the percentage of the skin graft that took by Day 4 or 5 was calculated. Complete take is defined as 100% take or skin graft incorporation.
Day 4 or 5
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Wounds With Total Skin Graft Loss
Day 4 or 5
Study Arms (2)
GSUC
EXPERIMENTALGauze-based wall suction negative pressure wound therapy for 4-5 days
Vacuum-assisted closure
ACTIVE COMPARATORVacuum-assisted closure (VAC) negative pressure wound therapy using commercially available device (KCI, Inc) for 4-5 days
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients of any sex, hospitalized at the University of Chicago Medical Center, requiring split thickness skin autografts with wounds that are amenable to placement of an occlusive dressing for negative pressure therapy will be eligible to participate in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant women, children under 18 years of age and other patients who are "vulnerable" as defined by the Institutional Review Board will not be eligible for the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Chicago Medical Center, Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Chicago, Illinois, 60637, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Lawrence Gottlieb
- Organization
- University of Chicago
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lawrence J Gottlieb, MD
University of Chicago, Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 31, 2009
First Posted
August 4, 2009
Study Start
May 1, 2009
Primary Completion
December 1, 2011
Study Completion
July 1, 2012
Last Updated
September 24, 2015
Results First Posted
September 24, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-08