Melphalan 200 mg/m2 Versus Melphalan 100 mg/m2 in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Patients
GISMM2001: Melphalan 200 mg/m2 Versus Melphalan 100 mg/m2 in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Patients: a Prospective, Multi-center Phase III Study
1 other identifier
interventional
298
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
In this study will be randomised before induction treatment either to receive two courses of melphalan 200 mg/m2 (MEL200) or two courses of melphalan 100 mg/m2 (MEL100). Informed consent will be obtained upon enrolment. Inclusion criteria included: diagnosis of untreated Durie e Salmon stage IIA-IIIB measurable multiple myeloma; age \< 65 years. Exclusion criteria included: prior treatment for myeloma; abnormal cardiac function, defined as systolic ejection fraction \<50%; abnormal pulmonary spirometry test; serum bilirubins \> 2.5 times normal and ALAT and/or ASAT \> 2 times normal; seropositivity for HIV, HCV or HBV, active non-hematologic malignancies. Induction therapy, PBSC mobilization, and autografting Initial treatment plan included induction chemotherapy with 2 courses of vincristine, 1 mg/m2 on day 1, adriamycin, 50 mg/m2 on day 1, and dexamethasone, 40mg/day days 1-4, administered 28 days apart, followed by peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilisation and harvest after 1 or 2 cycles of cyclophosphamide, 4 g/m2, and G-CSF, 10 ug/kg given i.v. or subcutaneously. After at least one month from PBSC collection, autografting consisted of melphalan, 200 mg/m2 or melphalan, 100 mg/m2, on day -2, and cryopreserved PBSC infusion on day 0. Patients received G-CSF, 5 ug/kg, from days +3 until neutrophil count \> 1000/ul were achieved. Supportive care and toxicity grading Following autografting, all patients received standard prophylaxis against bacterial and fungal infections; herpes simplex and varicella-zoster virus reactivation; and Pneumocystis carinii. Cytomegalovirus CMV reactivation was monitored through levels of CMV antigenemia and/or serum CMV DNA levels and treated with ganciclovir or foscarnet as clinically indicated. Standard criteria (Common Toxicity Criteria version 3.0) were used for grading hematological and non-hematological toxicity.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3 multiple-myeloma
Started Feb 2002
Typical duration for phase_3 multiple-myeloma
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2002
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 31, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 3, 2009
CompletedAugust 3, 2009
July 1, 2009
7.2 years
July 31, 2009
July 31, 2009
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Primary endpoints of the study were Overall Survival defined as the time from diagnosis until death from any cause; Progression Free Survival defined as the time from diagnosis until death from any cause or date of first relapse or progression.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Secondary endpoint was time to progression (TTP) defined as the time from the date of diagnosis to relapse or death from progression.
Study Arms (2)
Mel100
ACTIVE COMPARATORMel200
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Tandem autologous transplantation Melphalan 100 mg/m2 versus Melphalan 200 mg/m2
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- diagnosis of untreated Durie \& Salmon stage IIA-IIIB measurable multiple myeloma;
- age \< 65 years.
You may not qualify if:
- prior treatment for myeloma;
- abnormal cardiac function, defined as systolic ejection fraction \<50%;
- abnormal pulmonary spirometry test;
- serum bilirubins \> 2.5 times normal and ALAT and/or ASAT \> 2 times normal;
- seropositivity for HIV, HCV or HBV, active non-hematologic malignancies.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Bruno B, Falcone AP, Liberati AM, Grasso M, Ria R, Pisani F, Cangialosi C, Caravita T, Levi A, Meloni G, Nozza A, Pregno P, Gabbas A, Callea V, Rizzo M, Annino L, De Stefano V, Musto P, Baldi I, Cavallo F, Petrucci MT, Massaia M, Boccadoro M. Melphalan 200 mg/m(2) versus melphalan 100 mg/m(2) in newly diagnosed myeloma patients: a prospective, multicenter phase 3 study. Blood. 2010 Mar 11;115(10):1873-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-09-241737. Epub 2009 Dec 1.
PMID: 19965659DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mario Boccadoro, MD
Division of Hematology - University of Torino - A.O.U. San Giovanni Battista
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 31, 2009
First Posted
August 3, 2009
Study Start
February 1, 2002
Primary Completion
May 1, 2009
Study Completion
June 1, 2009
Last Updated
August 3, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-07