Safety of New Formulation of Glatiramer Acetate
Song
An Open-Label, Multicenter, Randomized Study Evaluating the Tolerability and Safety of Two Formulations of Glatiramer Acetate (GA) for Subcutaneous Injection
1 other identifier
interventional
147
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare pain associated with injections and injection-site reactions of the approved formulation of Glatiramer Acetate (GA) versus investigational formulation of GA. In addition, the investigators will evaluate the side effects of the two formulations of GA.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Jul 2009
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 25, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 28, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 9, 2011
CompletedMarch 14, 2017
February 1, 2017
2 months
July 25, 2009
September 28, 2010
February 2, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Subject-reported Pain Associated Immediately After Each Injection
A visual analog scale (VAS) was used for subjective characteristics that cannot be directly measured. Respondents specified their level of agreement to a statement by indicating a position along a continuous line between two end-points. The VAS scale used 0 mm to represent "no pain" and up to 100 mm to represent "worst possible pain;" subjects drew a continuous line to represent their level of pain.
5 weeks of injections
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Degree of Pain Within 5 Mins After Injection
5 weeks of injections
Study Arms (2)
F1 Glatiramer acetate 20mg/1.0ml
ACTIVE COMPARATORF2 Glatiramer acetate 20mg/0.5ml
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Subjects received both doses once daily in a crossover fashion, for a total treatment duration of five weeks, including a one-week run-in period. Subject-reported injection pain was recorded in a daily diary.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects ≥ 18 years of age with a diagnosis of RRMS
- Currently injecting GA 20mg/1.0mL per day subcutaneously (SC) for a minimum of 90 days utilizing the autoject®2 for glass syringe or by a manual injection technique
- Willing to switch from autoject®2 for glass syringe to manual injection technique or continue with a manual injection technique during the course of the study
- Willing and able to be trained on a seven site injection rotation. Subject must be willing to comply with a minimum five injection site rotation plan during the study
- Willing and able to complete all procedures and evaluations related to the study
- Willing to continue to follow usual injection site preparation and routine adjunctive LISR management techniques
- Willing and able to provide written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Currently using or treated with another immunomodulating therapy (IMT) in conjunction with GA in the 30 days prior to screening for this study
- Currently using intermittent or pulse courses of corticosteroids by any route of administration in the 30 days prior to screening for this study. (Corticosteroids are prohibited for the duration of the study.)
- Currently using an investigational drug or using treatment with any other investigational agent in the 30 days prior to screening for this study
- Presence or history of skin necrosis
- Known extensive dermatological condition that could be a confounding factor
- Pregnant or planning pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Any physical condition that impairs ability to be injected at the minimum of five sites rotation
- Not able or willing to complete a daily diary
- Use of any other parenteral medications (e.g., intramuscular, SC, intravenous, etc.) either currently or in the past 30 days prior to screening for this study
- Any other medical or psychiatric conditions that would make the subject unsuitable for this research, as determined by the Investigator
- Previous participation in this study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Blinding in this study was not possible due to the subjects' ability to detect difference in the volume of each formulation. The lack of blinding was a known limitation.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Thomas Smith, MD, VP, Medical Affairs
- Organization
- Teva Neuroscience, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Tom Smith, MD
Teva Neuroscience, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 25, 2009
First Posted
July 28, 2009
Study Start
July 1, 2009
Primary Completion
September 1, 2009
Study Completion
November 1, 2009
Last Updated
March 14, 2017
Results First Posted
June 9, 2011
Record last verified: 2017-02