NCT00943917

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine safety, efficacy and tolerability of various doses of ITCA 650 in subjects with type 2 diabetes.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
155

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_2 type-2-diabetes

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2009

Geographic Reach
1 country

50 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 20, 2009

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 22, 2009

Completed
10 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2009

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2010

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2011

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 3, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

April 13, 2015

Status Verified

March 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

July 20, 2009

Results QC Date

February 24, 2012

Last Update Submit

March 23, 2015

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Mean Change in HbA1c (Per Protocol)

    Mean change in HbA1c over first 12 weeks (Stage I)

    Day 0 and Week 12

  • Mean Change in HbA1c (ITT)

    Mean change in HbA1c through Week 12

    Day 0 to Week 12

  • Mean Change in HbA1c (Per Protocol)

    Mean change in HbA1c through Week 24

    Day 0 to Week 24

  • Mean Change in HbA1c (ITT)

    Mean change in HbA1c through Week 24

    Day 0 to Week 24

  • Mean Change in HbA1c (Per Protocol)

    Mean change in HbA1c through Week 48

    Day 0 to Week 48

  • Mean Change in HbA1c (ITT)

    Mean change in HbA1c through Week 48

    Day 0 to Week 48

Study Arms (9)

ITCA 650 20 mcg/day

EXPERIMENTAL
Other: ITCA 650

ITCA 650 40 mcg/day

EXPERIMENTAL
Other: ITCA 650

Exenatide Injection

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: Exenatide Injection

ITCA 650 20/20

EXPERIMENTAL
Other: ITCA 650

ITCA 650 20/60

EXPERIMENTAL
Other: ITCA 650

ITCA 650 40/40

EXPERIMENTAL
Other: ITCA 650

ITCA 650 40/80

EXPERIMENTAL
Other: ITCA 650

Ex Inj/ITCA 650 40

EXPERIMENTAL
Other: Ex Inj/ITCA 650

Ex Inj/ITCA 650 60

EXPERIMENTAL
Other: Ex Inj/ITCA 650

Interventions

ITCA 650 (continuous delivery of exenatide in DUROS)

ITCA 650 20 mcg/dayITCA 650 20/20ITCA 650 20/60ITCA 650 40 mcg/dayITCA 650 40/40ITCA 650 40/80

twice daily (BID) injections of exenatide commercially available Byetta: 5 mcg/dose first 12 weeks then 10 mcg/dose for 8 weeks

Also known as: Byetta
Exenatide Injection

twice-daily (BID) exenatide injection: 5 mcg/dose for 4 weeks then 10 mcg/dose for 8 weeks, followed by ITCA 650

Also known as: Byetta
Ex Inj/ITCA 650 40Ex Inj/ITCA 650 60

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Males or females age 18-70 years
  • Type 2 diabetes mellitus for ≥ 6 months prior to Screening Visit 1
  • On a stable (\> 3 months prior to Screening Visit 1) treatment regimen of metformin monotherapy;
  • Fasting plasma glucose \< 240 mg/dL at Screening Visit 1
  • HbA1c ≥ 7% and ≤ 10% at Screening Visit 1

You may not qualify if:

  • Prior treatment with exenatide
  • Treatment with any of the following antidiabetic agents within 3 months prior to Screening Visit 1: TZDs, sulfonylureas, DPP IV inhibitors, acarbose, or insulin (injected or inhaled)
  • History of type 1 diabetes and/or history of diabetic ketoacidosis
  • Body mass index ≥ 40 kg/m2;
  • History of organ transplantation

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (50)

Study Site

Chino, California, 91710, United States

Location

Study Site

La Jolla, California, 92037, United States

Location

Study Site

National City, California, 91950, United States

Location

Study Site

Sacramento, California, 95821, United States

Location

Study Site

San Diego, California, 92161, United States

Location

Study Site

Valley Village, California, 91607, United States

Location

Study Site

Longmont, Colorado, 80501, United States

Location

Study Site

Pueblo, Colorado, 81001, United States

Location

Study Site

Bradenton, Florida, 34203, United States

Location

Study Site

Miami, Florida, 33143, United States

Location

Study Site

Miami, Florida, 33169, United States

Location

Study Site

Miami, Florida, 33183, United States

Location

Study Site

Miramar, Florida, 33025, United States

Location

Study Site

Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33026, United States

Location

Study Site

St. Petersburg, Florida, 33709, United States

Location

Study Site

Atlanta, Georgia, 30342, United States

Location

Study Site

Sandy Springs, Georgia, 30328, United States

Location

Study Site

Meridian, Idaho, 83642, United States

Location

Study Site

Chicago, Illinois, 60607, United States

Location

Study Site

Avon, Indiana, 46123, United States

Location

Study Site

Wichita, Kansas, 67205, United States

Location

Study Site

Lexington, Kentucky, 40503, United States

Location

Study Site

New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112, United States

Location

Study Site

Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49007, United States

Location

Study Site

Traverse City, Michigan, 49684, United States

Location

Study Site

Troy, Michigan, 48098, United States

Location

Study Site

Ypsilanti, Michigan, 48197, United States

Location

Study Site

Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55416, United States

Location

Study Site

Las Vegas, Nevada, 89119, United States

Location

Study Site

New Hyde Park, New York, 11042, United States

Location

Study Site

Charlotte, North Carolina, 28209, United States

Location

Study Site

Hickory, North Carolina, 28601, United States

Location

Study Site

Cincinnati, Ohio, 45212, United States

Location

Study Site

Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219, United States

Location

Study Site

Franklin, Ohio, 45005, United States

Location

Study Site

Kettering, Ohio, 45429, United States

Location

Study Site

Norman, Oklahoma, 73069, United States

Location

Study Site

Eugene, Oregon, 97404, United States

Location

Study Site

Rapid City, South Dakota, 57702, United States

Location

Study Site

Austin, Texas, 78749, United States

Location

Study Site

Austin, Texas, 78752, United States

Location

Study Site

Dallas, Texas, 75230, United States

Location

Study Site

Dallas, Texas, 75251, United States

Location

Study Site

Irving, Texas, 75039, United States

Location

Study Site

San Antonio, Texas, 78205, United States

Location

Study Site

San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States

Location

Study Site

West Jordan, Utah, 84088, United States

Location

Study Site

Norfolk, Virginia, 23502, United States

Location

Study Site

Olympia, Washington, 98502, United States

Location

Study Site

Spokane, Washington, 99202, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Henry RR, Rosenstock J, Logan DK, Alessi TR, Luskey K, Baron MA. Randomized trial of continuous subcutaneous delivery of exenatide by ITCA 650 versus twice-daily exenatide injections in metformin-treated type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2013 Sep;36(9):2559-65. doi: 10.2337/dc12-2410. Epub 2013 May 3.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Interventions

Exenatide

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diabetes MellitusGlucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PeptidesAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsVenomsComplex MixturesToxins, BiologicalBiological Factors

Limitations and Caveats

8 subjects (4 in 20, 1 in 40 and 3 in ex inj)completed StI but not randomized to St II; 3 subjects (2 in 20/20 \& 1 in 40/80) who completed St I, randomized to St II but not given study drug. St II Cont was optional, so not all pts elected to continue

Results Point of Contact

Title
Michelle Baron MD
Organization
Intarcia Therapeutics, Inc

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 20, 2009

First Posted

July 22, 2009

Study Start

August 1, 2009

Primary Completion

August 1, 2010

Study Completion

February 1, 2011

Last Updated

April 13, 2015

Results First Posted

May 3, 2012

Record last verified: 2015-03

Locations