NCT00942890

Brief Summary

The purpose of this randomized control study is to determine if administering neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) to the thigh muscles of a below the knee amputee is more effective than the current standard of care in preserving thigh muscle strength. In addition, this study will examine the NMES treatment effects on the participant's gait, quality of life, functional performance of standing, walking, and stair climbing, and symptoms associated with residual and phantom limb pain. The primary aim is to compare NMES plus standard rehabilitation (treatment group) to the standard rehabilitation (control group) by measuring lower extremity muscle strength. The secondary aims are to compare NMES treatment group to the control group by measuring Quality of Life (QOL) and the symptoms associated with residual \& phantom limb pain. In addition to the specific aims, this study will also examine the two groups for functional performance and gait patterns after prosthetic fitting.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
44

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2009

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2009

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 15, 2009

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 21, 2009

Completed
6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2015

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 10, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

April 10, 2018

Status Verified

October 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

6.3 years

First QC Date

July 15, 2009

Results QC Date

October 11, 2016

Last Update Submit

March 14, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Case ManagementAmputationMuscle strengthphantom limb pain

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Lower Extremity Muscle Strength- Extension

    Muscle strength was measured with a handheld dynamometer for extensor knee strength of the residual and intact limb.

    0, 3, 6, 9, 12 wks

  • Lower Extremity Muscle Strength- Flexion

    Muscle strength was measured with a handheld dynamometer for extensor and flexor knee strength of the residual and intact limb.

    0, 3, 6, 9, 12 wks

  • Lower Extremity Mobility-Distance

    Mobility was measured by the distance walked in 2 minutes.

    6, 12 wks

  • Lower Extremity Mobility- Up and Go

    Mobility was measured by the time to complete an "up and go" test.

    6, 12 wks

  • Lower Extremity Mobility- Stair Climb

    Mobility was measured by the time to complete a timed stair climb.

    6, 12 wks

  • Lower Extremity Mobility-Chair Rise

    Mobility was measured by the number of stands during the 30-second chair rise test.

    6, 12 wks

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Pain Severity

    0, 3, 6, 9, 12 wks

  • Pain Interference

    0, 3, 6, 9, 12 wks

Study Arms (2)

NMES plus Standard Rehab Protocol

EXPERIMENTAL

NMES (EMPI 300PV stimulator) plus standard of care intervention. NMES is to the quadriceps muscle of the residual and intact limb plus rehabilitation. Therapy is 12-wks of NMES home training w/ the EMPI 300PV muscle stimulator. Participants perform training at home for 5days/wk; sessions consisted of 15 to 20 min. of NMES to each leg eliciting15 contractions/leg (10 seconds on:50 seconds off), plus a 5-minute patient treatment log, 5x/wk for 12-wks. Each contraction will be elicited by an electrical impulse generated by a battery-operated device. Two 3" X 5" electrodes are placed over the quadriceps muscle group. Participants will train at 30-40% of MVC during weeks 1-6, and 40-50% of MVC during weeks 7-12; incremental increases will be made at the study visits.

Device: NMES (EMPI 300PV stimulator) plus standard of care

Standard Rehab Protocol

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

TMARP standard of care intervention: 12 weeks of the Traditional Military Amputee Rehabilitation Program (TMARP). TMARP training starts 1 week after surgical closure of the residual limb. Physical Therapy performs Pre-Prosthetic Training for about 6 weeks, preparing for the prosthetic. After pre-prosthetic training, patients are fitted with their prosthetic leg and began post-prosthetic training with PT. The training focus is lower limb prosthetic proficient in ambulation.

Behavioral: TMARP standard of care

Interventions

In addition to the standard rehabilitation, the NMES treatment group will receive neuromuscular electrical stimulation to the quadriceps muscle of the residual and intact limb. The name of the NMES device is EMPI 300PV. NMES training will consist of performing 15 to 20 minute stimulation sessions with a 5-minute patient treatment log, 5 times per week for 12 weeks. During each training session, 15 NMES contractions per leg will be completed. Each contraction will be elicited by an electrical impulse (300PV) generated by a battery-operated device. This will be performed at home.

Also known as: EMPI 300PV neuromuscular stimulator
NMES plus Standard Rehab Protocol

The usual care is 12 weeks of the Traditional Military Amputee Rehabilitation Program (TMARP). TMARP training starts 1week after surgical closure of the residual limb. Physical Therapy performs Pre-Prosthetic Training for about 6 weeks, preparing for the prosthetic. After pre-prosthetic training, patients are fitted with their prosthetic leg and began post-prosthetic training with PT. The training focus is lower limb prosthetic proficient in ambulation.

Also known as: Traditional Military Amputee Rehabilitation Program
Standard Rehab Protocol

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 55 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Unilateral trans-tibial amputee;
  • Military service member at the time of injury (Active Duty, Reserves or National Guard);
  • Age ≥18 and ≤55 years; and
  • Able to provide freely given informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • A significant co-morbid medical condition (such as severe uncontrolled hypertension (over 160/100 mmHg) or neurological disorders such as epilepsy) where NMES strength training is contraindicated and/or participation would pose a safety threat or impair their ability to participate;
  • Unable to speak and read English;
  • Implanted cardiac pacemaker or defibrillator;
  • Vision impairment where participant is classified as legally blind (we define legally blind both clinically and functionally. Clinically, it is central visual acuity of 20/200 or less in the better eye with corrective glasses. Functionally, the participant is not able to see the digital numbers on the NMES device with corrective glasses);
  • Unwillingness to accept random assignment;
  • Currently participating in another research study with an intervention that would potentially confound the outcome variables of this study (we will also instruct participants that joining a study after being enrolled in this protocol is also not allowed); and
  • Conflicting co-morbidities including traumatic brain injury (score \< 14 on glasgow coma scale), and a contralateral lower extremity injury that causes antalgic gait, pain \> 5/10 consistently on the contralateral limb and/or a grade of \< 4+/5 in lower extremity.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Navy Medical Center

San Diego, California, 92134, United States

Location

Walter Reed National Military Medical Center

Bethesda, Maryland, 20889, United States

Location

University of Tennessee Health Science Center

Memphis, Tennessee, 38163, United States

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Talbot LA, Brede E, Price M, Metter EJ. Health-related quality of life in active duty military: A secondary data analysis of two randomized controlled trials. Nurs Outlook. 2017 Sep-Oct;65(5S):S53-S60. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2017.07.010. Epub 2017 Jul 25.

  • Talbot LA, Brede E, Metter EJ. Effects of Adding Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation to Traditional Military Amputee Rehabilitation. Mil Med. 2017 Jan;182(1):e1528-e1535. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00037.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Amputation, TraumaticPhantom Limb

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Wounds and InjuriesPerceptual DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesPain, PostoperativePostoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsSigns and SymptomsPain

Limitations and Caveats

The limitations of the the study was that it was not powered to detect a small or moderate difference between the two treatment groups. The sample was small and limited to military service members.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Laura Talbot
Organization
University of Tennessee Health Science Center

Study Officials

  • Laura A Talbot, PhD

    UTHSC

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Michelle Kane, PhD

    Walter Reed National Military Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Michael Rosenthal, PhD

    Navy Medical Center San Diego

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 15, 2009

First Posted

July 21, 2009

Study Start

April 1, 2009

Primary Completion

August 1, 2015

Study Completion

August 1, 2015

Last Updated

April 10, 2018

Results First Posted

April 10, 2018

Record last verified: 2015-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations