Patient Centered Evaluation of Computerized Patient Records System
PACECPRS
1 other identifier
interventional
151
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The VHA is a leader in electronic medical records (EMR) use for patient care. It is believed that EMR use by doctors will improve patient-centeredness of visits, and improve clinical care. The proposed study will determine how doctors should use the EMR during patient consultations. We will also develop a training program to improve doctors ability to communicate with patients while using EMR.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2010
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 7, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 9, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 6, 2015
CompletedNovember 6, 2015
October 1, 2015
2.8 years
July 7, 2009
January 31, 2014
October 7, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Change in Patient's Satisfaction, Change in Provider's Satisfaction (Mean/SD)
Three patient satisfaction subscales were analyzed (range 1-5 for all subscales, 1=not satisfied at all, 5=very satisfied). Subscale 1 measures physician's use of patient center communication; Subscale 2 measures clinical competence and skills; Subscale 3 measures physician interpersonal skills. Four provider satisfaction subscales were analyzed (range 1-5 for all subscales, 1=not satisfied at all, 5=very satisfied). Subscale 1 measures quality of physician-patient relation; Subscale 2 measures patient's non-demanding co-operative nature, Subscale 3 measures satisfaction with data collection; Subscale 4 measures satisfaction with use of visit time. Change in patient's satisfaction and change in provider's satisfaction from pre to post-intervention clinic visit was reported for the above subscales. Higher change score indicates better outcome. Mean and standard deviation were reported.
Baseline clinic visit and post-intervention clinic visit (over a period of 1 year)
Change in Patient's Satisfaction, Change in Provider's Satisfaction (Median/Range)
Three patient satisfaction subscales were analyzed (range 1-5 for all subscales, 1=not satisfied at all, 5=very satisfied). Subscale 1 measures physician's use of patient center communication; Subscale 2 measures clinical competence and skills; Subscale 3 measures physician interpersonal skills. Four provider satisfaction subscales were analyzed (range 1-5 for all subscales, 1=not satisfied at all, 5=very satisfied). Subscale 1 measures quality of physician-patient relation; Subscale 2 measures patient's non-demanding co-operative nature, Subscale 3 measures satisfaction with data collection; Subscale 4 measures satisfaction with use of visit time. Change in patient's satisfaction and change in provider's satisfaction from pre to post-intervention clinic visit was reported for the above subscales. Higher change score indicates better outcome. Median and range were reported.
Baseline clinic visit and post-intervention clinic visit (over a period of 1 year)
Change in Patient Engagement
Change in proportion of time spent on physician-patient communication from pre to post-intervention clinic visit was calculated. Positive change indicates increased time spent on patient communication. Mean and standard deviation of outcomes were reported in this table.
Baseline clinic visit and post-intervention clinic visit (over a period of 1 year)
Change in Total Number of EMR Mouse Click Per Visit (Mean/SD)
For EMR use, we assessed the change in total number of mouse click per-visit, positive score indicates increased EMR use. Mean and standard deviation of outcome were reported in this table.
Baseline clinic visit and post-intervention clinic visit (over a period of 1 year)
Change in Total Number of EMR Mouse Click Per Visit (Median/Range)
For EMR use, we assessed the change in total number of mouse click per-visit, positive score indicates increased EMR use.
Baseline clinic visit and post-intervention clinic visit (over a period of 1 year)
Change in EMR Mouse Click Per Minute Per Visit (Mean/SD)
Baseline clinic visit and post-intervention clinic visit (over a period of 1 year)
Change in EMR Mouse Click Per Minute Per Visit (Median/Range)
For EMR use, we assessed the change in the average number of mouse clicks per minute per-visit, positive score indicates increased EMR use.
Baseline clinic visit and post-intervention clinic visit (over a period of 1 year)
Study Arms (1)
PACE Study
OTHERThe study utilized a quasi-experimental pre-post intervention design. The intervention provided was physician education to improve EMR use and communication. Physician training in patient-centered EMR use was developed. The conceptual model of "patient-centered communication" will provide the underlying framework for the training aimed at improving physicians interviewing and communication skills.
Interventions
This intervention was performed in between the pre-intervention (Baseline) clinic visit and post intervention clinic visit.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult (age\>18) male and female patients from participating study providers' practices who have an established a doctor-patient relationship with their provider and require a minimum of 2 primary care clinic visits/year based on historical clinic data.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with significant communication disability (severe speech and hearing impairment, severe dementia, or a mental health condition resulting in a non-communicative patient);
- patients are considered mentally incompetent to provide informed written consent;
- a life expectancy of less than 1 year.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego
San Diego, California, 92161, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Study limitations include inability to capture EHR activity outside the visit, study only primary care providers at a single organization (VA) and only one EHR system, this limits generalizability of the findings to other setting.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Zia Agha
- Organization
- VA san Diego Healthcare System
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Zia Agha, MD MS
VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 7, 2009
First Posted
July 9, 2009
Study Start
May 1, 2010
Primary Completion
February 1, 2013
Study Completion
April 1, 2013
Last Updated
November 6, 2015
Results First Posted
November 6, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-10