NCT00934752

Brief Summary

The study will enroll patients with angiographically significant coronary de novo lesions. Subjects will be randomized 1:1 and treated with a Lutonix catheter either before or after bare-metal stenting (BMS). The purpose is to assess the feasibility, safety and efficacy of the Lutonix Catheter for treatment of de novo coronary artery stenosis using two distinct treatment strategies.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
24

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2009

Typical duration for phase_1

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2009

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 6, 2009

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 8, 2009

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2010

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

January 16, 2017

Status Verified

January 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

July 6, 2009

Last Update Submit

January 13, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

de novo stenotic lesions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Mean percent stent volume obstruction as measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT)

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Stent Malposition

    6 Months

  • Minimal Lumen Area

    6 Months

  • Stent Symmetry

    6 Months

  • Stent Expansion

    6 Months

Study Arms (1)

Lutonix Catheter

EXPERIMENTAL
Device: Lutonix Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon

Interventions

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PCTA)

Also known as: Drug Coated Balloon
Lutonix Catheter

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male or non-pregnant/non-breast feeding Female ≥ 18 years of age. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test (within 7 days of the procedure);
  • Documented stable angina pectoris Canadian Cardiovascular Society Classification (CCSC) 1-4, unstable angina pectoris with documented ischemia (Braunwald I-II) or documented silent ischemia;
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 25%;
  • Patient is an acceptable candidate for PTCA, stenting, and emergent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG);
  • Patient is willing to provide informed consent and comply with follow-up visits and testing schedule;
  • Target lesion is a de novo lesion in a native coronary artery vessel;
  • Initial stenosis is ≥ 50% and \< 100% by visual estimate or quantitative coronary angiography (QCA);
  • Reference Vessel Diameter (RVD) is ≥ 2.5 and ≤ 3.25 prior to predilation;
  • Target lesion is ≤18mm in length and can be treated in its entirety by no more than 1 single Lutonix Catheter balloon and 1 single BMS;
  • Guidewire is able to cross lesion and be placed in distal vessel prior to enrollment;
  • Enrollment permitted after successful treatment of 1 non-study lesion in a single other non-study vessel (not in the same vascular territory as the study lesion). Successful treatment is defined as ≤ 30% residual stenosis with Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Grade III flow and not evidence of dissection.

You may not qualify if:

  • History of stroke within past 6 months;
  • History of myocardial infarction (MI) or thrombolysis within 72 hours of randomization;
  • Prior vascular brachytherapy;
  • Uncontrollable allergies to procedure medications, materials or contrast;
  • Angiographic evidence of thrombus or dissection within the target vessel;
  • Intervention of another coronary lesion ≤ 60 days before index procedure day or planned following index procedure;
  • Target lesion is planned to be treated with something other than PTCA and stent (i.e., cutting-balloon, atherectomy, vascular brachytherapy (VBT), etc.);
  • Target lesion is in the Left Main and has excessive calcification or tortuosity or involves bifurcation disease of vessel ≥ 2.5mm;
  • Known sensitivity or has received paclitaxel or other antimitogenic agent within 12 months prior to target vessel treatment;
  • Patient has any previous intervention (PTCA, stent, etc.) of the target coronary vessel;
  • Any medical condition, in the investigators opinion, that should preclude the patient from the study or patient has a life expectancy less than 24 months;
  • Known creatine kinase-MB (CKMB) \> 2x upper limit of normal (ULN) or positive Troponin;
  • Creatinine \> 2.0 mg/dl;
  • Leukocyte \< 3500/mL;
  • Platelet \< 100,000 mL or \> 750,000 mL;
  • +3 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Academic Medical Center

Amsterdam, Netherlands

Location

Catherina Zeikenhuis

Eindhoven, Netherlands

Location

Thorax Center

Rotterdam, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (16)

  • Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, Macaya C, Rutsch W, Heyndrickx G, Emanuelsson H, Marco J, Legrand V, Materne P, et al. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1994 Aug 25;331(8):489-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199408253310801.

    PMID: 8041413BACKGROUND
  • Colombo A, Drzewiecki J, Banning A, Grube E, Hauptmann K, Silber S, Dudek D, Fort S, Schiele F, Zmudka K, Guagliumi G, Russell ME; TAXUS II Study Group. Randomized study to assess the effectiveness of slow- and moderate-release polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stents for coronary artery lesions. Circulation. 2003 Aug 19;108(7):788-94. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000086926.62288.A6. Epub 2003 Aug 4.

    PMID: 12900339BACKGROUND
  • Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, Boam A, Cohen DJ, van Es GA, Steg PG, Morel MA, Mauri L, Vranckx P, McFadden E, Lansky A, Hamon M, Krucoff MW, Serruys PW; Academic Research Consortium. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation. 2007 May 1;115(17):2344-51. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.685313.

    PMID: 17470709BACKGROUND
  • Eisenstein EL, Anstrom KJ, Kong DF, Shaw LK, Tuttle RH, Mark DB, Kramer JM, Harrington RA, Matchar DB, Kandzari DE, Peterson ED, Schulman KA, Califf RM. Clopidogrel use and long-term clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stent implantation. JAMA. 2007 Jan 10;297(2):159-68. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.2.joc60179. Epub 2006 Dec 5.

    PMID: 17148711BACKGROUND
  • Acute platelet inhibition with abciximab does not reduce in-stent restenosis (ERASER study). The ERASER Investigators. Circulation. 1999 Aug 24;100(8):799-806. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.100.8.799.

    PMID: 10458714BACKGROUND
  • Erbel R, Haude M, Hopp HW, Franzen D, Rupprecht HJ, Heublein B, Fischer K, de Jaegere P, Serruys P, Rutsch W, Probst P. Coronary-artery stenting compared with balloon angioplasty for restenosis after initial balloon angioplasty. Restenosis Stent Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1998 Dec 3;339(23):1672-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199812033392304.

    PMID: 9834304BACKGROUND
  • Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS, Schatz RA, Savage MP, Penn I, Detre K, Veltri L, Ricci D, Nobuyoshi M, et al. A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1994 Aug 25;331(8):496-501. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199408253310802.

    PMID: 8041414BACKGROUND
  • Gonzalo N, Garcia-Garcia HM, Serruys PW, Commissaris KH, Bezerra H, Gobbens P, Costa M, Regar E. Reproducibility of quantitative optical coherence tomography for stent analysis. EuroIntervention. 2009 Jun;5(2):224-32. doi: 10.4244/eijv5i2a35.

    PMID: 19527980BACKGROUND
  • Holmes DR Jr, Teirstein P, Satler L, Sketch M, O'Malley J, Popma JJ, Kuntz RE, Fitzgerald PJ, Wang H, Caramanica E, Cohen SA; SISR Investigators. Sirolimus-eluting stents vs vascular brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis within bare-metal stents: the SISR randomized trial. JAMA. 2006 Mar 15;295(11):1264-73. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.11.1264. Epub 2006 Mar 12.

    PMID: 16531619BACKGROUND
  • Joner M, Finn AV, Farb A, Mont EK, Kolodgie FD, Ladich E, Kutys R, Skorija K, Gold HK, Virmani R. Pathology of drug-eluting stents in humans: delayed healing and late thrombotic risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Jul 4;48(1):193-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.03.042. Epub 2006 May 5.

    PMID: 16814667BACKGROUND
  • King SB 3rd, Smith SC Jr, Hirshfeld JW Jr, Jacobs AK, Morrison DA, Williams DO, Feldman TE, Kern MJ, O'Neill WW, Schaff HV, Whitlow PL; ACC/AHA/SCAI; Adams CD, Anderson JL, Buller CE, Creager MA, Ettinger SM, Halperin JL, Hunt SA, Krumholz HM, Kushner FG, Lytle BW, Nishimura R, Page RL, Riegel B, Tarkington LG, Yancy CW. 2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Jan 15;51(2):172-209. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.10.002. No abstract available.

    PMID: 18191745BACKGROUND
  • Lee MS, Pessegueiro A, Zimmer R, Jurewitz D, Tobis J. Clinical presentation of patients with in-stent restenosis in the drug-eluting stent era. J Invasive Cardiol. 2008 Aug;20(8):401-3.

    PMID: 18688064BACKGROUND
  • Mauri L, Hsieh WH, Massaro JM, Ho KK, D'Agostino R, Cutlip DE. Stent thrombosis in randomized clinical trials of drug-eluting stents. N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 8;356(10):1020-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067731. Epub 2007 Feb 12.

    PMID: 17296821BACKGROUND
  • Lansky AJ, Popma JJ, Cutlip D, Ho KK, Abizaid AS, Saucedo J, Zhang Y, Senerchia C, Kuntz RE, Leon MB, Baim DS. Comparative analysis of early and late angiographic outcomes using two quantitative algorithms in the Balloon versus Optimal Atherectomy Trial (BOAT). Am J Cardiol. 1999 Jun 15;83(12):1611-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00166-6.

  • Gutierrez-Chico JL, Wykrzykowska J, Nuesch E, van Geuns RJ, Koch KT, Koolen JJ, di Mario C, Windecker S, van Es GA, Gobbens P, Juni P, Regar E, Serruys PW. Vascular tissue reaction to acute malapposition in human coronary arteries: sequential assessment with optical coherence tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Feb 1;5(1):20-9, S1-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.965301. Epub 2012 Feb 7.

  • Gutierrez-Chico JL, van Geuns RJ, Koch KT, Koolen JJ, Duckers H, Regar E, Serruys PW. Paclitaxel-coated balloon in combination with bare metal stent for treatment of de novo coronary lesions: an optical coherence tomography first-in-human randomised trial, balloon first vs. stent first. EuroIntervention. 2011 Oct 30;7(6):711-22. doi: 10.4244/EIJV7I6A114.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coronary Stenosis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Coronary DiseaseMyocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesVascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Prof. P.W.J C. Serruys, MD, PhD

    Erasmus Universtiy Medical Center; Netherlands

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 6, 2009

First Posted

July 8, 2009

Study Start

July 1, 2009

Primary Completion

April 1, 2010

Study Completion

January 1, 2012

Last Updated

January 16, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-01

Locations