NCT00928954

Brief Summary

Involuntary oscillations of the eyes (nystagmus) impairs vision so that affected patients, who have neurological disorders such as Multiple Sclerosis (MS) , cannot read or watch TV. Two medicines have been reported to suppress nystagmus and improve vision in such patients: gabapentin and memantine. The investigators set out to test which of these two drug was more effective by carrying out a double-blind cross-over study. In this way, we could determine which drug worked best in each patient.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
10

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2005

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2005

Completed
4.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2009

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2009

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 25, 2009

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 26, 2009

Completed
7.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 29, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

July 29, 2016

Status Verified

July 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

4.2 years

First QC Date

June 25, 2009

Results QC Date

February 9, 2012

Last Update Submit

July 28, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

gabapentinmemantinenystagmusDrug treatment

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in logMAR Visual Acuity of Each Eye, Measured During Far or Near Viewing

    After 2 weeks of therapy, for both drugs

  • Percent Change in Median Eye Speed

    Median eye speed during attempted visual fixation by each eye

    After 2 weeks of therapy, for both drugs

Study Arms (2)

Gabapentin

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Increasing dose to 300 mg four times per day (total of 1200 mg/day)

Drug: gabapentin

Memantine

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Increasing dose over two weeks to 20 mg twice/day (total of 40 mg/day).

Drug: memantine

Interventions

increasing to 1200 mg/day

Also known as: Neurontin
Gabapentin

increasing to 40 mg/day

Also known as: Nameda
Memantine

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult (18 years or older) males or females with acquired nystagmus that is degrading their vision

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnant women
  • Individuals who cannot describe their visual symptoms, cooperate with testing, or give informed consent
  • Individuals with intolerance of gabapentin or memantine

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 10701 East Boulevard

Cleveland, Ohio, 44106, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Nystagmus, Pathologic

Interventions

GabapentinMemantine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Ocular Motility DisordersCranial Nerve DiseasesNervous System DiseasesEye Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AminesOrganic Chemicalsgamma-Aminobutyric AcidAminobutyratesButyratesAcids, AcyclicCarboxylic AcidsCyclohexanecarboxylic AcidsAcids, CarbocyclicCyclohexanesCycloparaffinsHydrocarbons, AlicyclicHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsAmino AcidsAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsAmantadineAdamantaneBridged-Ring Compounds

Results Point of Contact

Title
R. John Leigh, M.D.
Organization
Case Western Reserve University

Study Officials

  • Richard J Leigh, MD

    Case Western Reserve University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
R. John Leigh, M.D.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 25, 2009

First Posted

June 26, 2009

Study Start

February 1, 2005

Primary Completion

May 1, 2009

Study Completion

May 1, 2009

Last Updated

July 29, 2016

Results First Posted

July 29, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-07

Locations