Investigative Study of the Role of Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer Treatment
Focal Therapy for Organ Confined Prostate Cancer: an Investigative Prospective Pilot Study
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Surgery and irradiation for organ confined prostate cancer provide excellent long-term cancer control but they may be accompanied by a risk of side effects that decrease quality of life. Due to the stage migration of prostate cancer, the potential for patients to undergo unnecessary treatment and the risk of treatment related morbidity, has been increased.Alternative strategies that offer the possibility of delaying, obviating or minimizing the impact of treatment maintaining the same oncological long term results have been investigated. Despite pros and cons active surveillance has not gained popularity in men with low risk prostate cancer as only 7% of men with localized prostate cancer remain in active surveillance. Traditionally solid tumors have been treated with radical surgery but selective, organ sparing therapies are now common for tumors of the breast, skin and kidney, resulting in equivalent rates of cancer control, lower morbidity rates and less disfigurement. With this in mind the potential role of focal ablative therapy for localized prostate cancer might be considered. The researchers will investigate the feasibility and the efficacy in term of quality of life and oncologic results of focal therapy by a pilot not randomized prospective study in a patients with localized prostate cancer who meet low risk criteria based on clinical, biopsy and imaging data.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1 prostate-cancer
Started Sep 2009
Typical duration for phase_1 prostate-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 25, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 26, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2014
CompletedSeptember 15, 2009
September 1, 2009
1 year
June 25, 2009
September 14, 2009
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Feasibility, Safety, Tolerability (patient's complying with the follow-up), and Oncological efficacy
5 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Changes in QoL instruments (IPSS/IIEF/FACT-P/MSHQ)
5 years
Study Arms (1)
cryotherapy
EXPERIMENTALFocal Cryotherapy of localized tumor of prostate after spatial definition by in-house extended perineal core biopsy using a template biopsy strategy under local or general anesthesia
Interventions
Cryotherapy is administered via the perineum under ultrasound guidance by third-generation 17-gauge cryoprobes using gas and thermal couples. Under transrectal ultrasound guidance cryoprobes are placed approximately 1 cm apart and within 5 mm of the capsule on the side of tumor. The extent of freezing was limited to the area or lobe of the gland with histologically proved tumor.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical
- Clinical stage T1c or T2a
- PSA less than 10 ng/ml
- PSA velocity less than 2 ng/ml yearly in the year prior to diagnosis
- Biopsy
- Minimum of 12 cores
- No Gleason grade 4 or 5
- Maximum percentage of cancer in each core (20%)
- Maximum length of cancer in each core ( 5 mm)
- Maximum percentage of total cores with cancer (20%)
- Imaging
- Single lesion with a maximum size (12 mm)
- Maximum length of capsular contact (10 mm)
- No evidence of extraprostatic extension or seminal vesicle invasion
You may not qualify if:
- Tumor in the transitional zone
- Previous prostate surgery for benign pathology
- Any rectal or perineal pathology hampering instrumentation and manipulation of the area
- Benign or malignant rectal lesion
- Any condition that in the judgment of the investigators would interfere with the subject's ability to provide informed consent, comply with study instructions, place the subject at increased risk, or which might confound interpretation of study results.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Urology University "Vita e Salute" HSR
Milan, 50127, Italy
Related Publications (1)
Losa A, Gadda GM, Lazzeri M, Lughezzani G, Cardone G, Freschi M, Lista G, Larcher A, Nava LD, Guazzoni G. Complications and quality of life after template-assisted transperineal prostate biopsy in patients eligible for focal therapy. Urology. 2013 Jun;81(6):1291-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.11.078. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
PMID: 23522299DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Giorgio Guazzoni, MD
University "Vita e Salute" San Raffaele Milano
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 25, 2009
First Posted
June 26, 2009
Study Start
September 1, 2009
Primary Completion
September 1, 2010
Study Completion
September 1, 2014
Last Updated
September 15, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-09