PASCOE-Agil HOM-Injektopas in the Treatment of Rheumatic Disorders
157
1 other identifier
observational
1,389
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this observational study is to give an overview of the use of PASCOE-Agil HOM-Injektopas in a 2-4 week treatment of rheumatic disorders.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2009
Shorter than P25 for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 16, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 17, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 4, 2015
CompletedMay 4, 2015
April 1, 2015
4 months
June 16, 2009
May 16, 2013
April 16, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (9)
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Efficacy of the drug, measured by a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Scale ranged from 0(=best, no pain) to 10(worst, intolerable pain) The VAS was filled by the patient.
Beginning (Visit 1) and after 2 (visit 2) + 4 weeks (Visit3)
Tolerability of the Drug
Tolerability assessment of medical personnel End of study could by after 2 (visit 2) or after 4 weeks (Visit3). It was measured by a score: * very well tolerated (no side effects) * moderately tolerated (mild side effects) * poorly tolerated (marked side effects)
after end of study
Pain at Rest
Number of patient (in %) with an improvement of pain at rest between V1 and V2 / V1 and V3 / V2 and V3 A four-point scale (0=not present, 1=slightly, 2=moderate, 3=severe) was used to record symptom severity before the beginning, during treatment and at the end of the observation period.
Beginning (Visit 1) and after 2 (visit 2) + 4 weeks (Visit3)
Pain in Movement
Number of patients (in %) with an improvement of pain in movement between V1 and V3 / V1 and V3 / V2 and V3 A four-point scale (0=not present, 1=slightly, 2=moderate, 3=severe) was used to record symptom severity before the beginning, during treatment and at the end of the observation period.
Beginning (Visit 1) and after 2 (visit 2) + 4 weeks (Visit3)
Pain After Rest
Number of patients (in %) with an improvement of pain after rest between V1 and V3 / V1 and V3 / V2 and V3 A four-point scale (0=not present, 1=slightly, 2=moderate, 3=severe) was used to record symptom severity before the beginning, during treatment and at the end of the observation period.
Beginning (Visit 1) and after 2 (visit 2) + 4 weeks (Visit3)
Pain on Weight-bearing
Number of patients (in%) with an improvement of pain on weight-bearing between V1 and V3 / V1 and V3 / V2 and V3 A four-point scale (0=not present, 1=slightly, 2=moderate, 3=severe) was used to record symptom severity before the beginning, during treatment and at the end of the observation period.
Beginning (Visit 1) and after 2 (visit 2) + 4 weeks (Visit3)
Morning Stiffness
Number of patients (in%) with an improvement of morning stiffness between V1 and V3 / V1 and V3 / V2 and V3 A four-point scale (0=not present, 1=slightly, 2=moderate, 3=severe) was used to record symptom severity before the beginning, during treatment and at the end of the observation period.
Beginning (Visit 1) and after 2 (visit 2) + 4 weeks (Visit3)
Tenderness
Number of patients (in%) with an improvement of tenderness between V1 and V3 / V1 and V3 / V2 and V3 A four-point scale (0=not present, 1=slightly, 2=moderate, 3=severe) was used to record symptom severity before the beginning, during treatment and at the end of the observation period.
Beginning (Visit 1) and after 2 (visit 2) + 4 weeks (Visit3)
Antalgic Position
Number of patients (in%) with an improvement of antalgic position V1 and V3 / V1 and V3 / V2 and V3 A four-point scale (0=not present, 1=slightly, 2=moderate, 3=severe) was used to record symptom severity before the beginning, during treatment and at the end of the observation period.
Beginning (Visit 1) and after 2 (visit 2) + 4 weeks (Visit3)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Acceptance of the Drug
from enrollment until completion
Study Arms (1)
Observational group
Patients suffering from rheumatic disorders of different types and origins, especially those with arthralgia, myalgia, lumbago, or other diagnoses.
Eligibility Criteria
Cohort of adult patients suffering from rheumatic diseases and relating symptoms who present themselves in German Primary Care Centers.
You may not qualify if:
- Males and females
- At least 18 years old
- Rheumatic disease with accompanying symptoms, e.g. arthralgia, myalgia, lumbago etc.
- younger than 18 years
- no Rheumatic disease with accompanying symptoms, e.g. arthralgia, myalgia, lumbago etc.
- no treatment with PASCOE-Agil HOM-Injektopas
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Anja Braschoss
- Organization
- Pascoe pharmazeutische Präparate GmbH
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Anja Braschoss, MD
Pascoe Pharmazeutische Praeparate GmbH
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 16, 2009
First Posted
June 17, 2009
Study Start
January 1, 2009
Primary Completion
May 1, 2009
Study Completion
May 1, 2009
Last Updated
May 4, 2015
Results First Posted
May 4, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-04