Impact of Strattera and Behavior Therapy on the Home and School Functioning of Children With ADHD
Effects of Strattera and Behavior Therapy on the School and Home Functioning of Elementary School Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
1 other identifier
interventional
56
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: Multiple studies have found Atomoxetine (Strattera) to be efficacious but there is only one published study specifically designed to evaluate its efficacy in school settings. In this 7 week placebo-controlled study, Atomoxetine (ATX) at mean dose of 1.3 mg/kg, significantly reduced teacher rated ADHD symptoms (Weiss et al., 2005). However, children are typically referred for treatment because of "real life" problems in functioning, not symptoms (Pelham, Fabiano, \& Massetti, 2005). While ATX has been found to produce functional improvements at home, the Weiss study found limited results in this area at school. Furthermore, almost no research has examined the effects of combining ATX and behavior therapy (BT). In the MTA, adding BT to stimulants improved teacher ratings of hyperactivity/impulsivity and increased the number of subjects reaching optimal response (Swanson et al., 2001). Therefore, it is possible that the addition of BT to ATX may improve functional performance in the classroom. The effects of combined therapy may be even larger for ATX as monotherapy with nonstimulants produces smaller effect sizes than with stimulants. Objective: The primary objective was to evaluate the effects of ATX alone and in combination with BT on the school functioning of 56 children ages 6-12 with ADHD. Outcomes were assessed using traditional symptoms measures as well as functional measures of academic and behavioral improvements in the classroom.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jan 2007
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 9, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 11, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 7, 2020
CompletedOctober 20, 2020
October 1, 2020
1.3 years
June 9, 2009
March 23, 2011
October 16, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rule Violations During Direct Classroom Observation at Endpoint (Week 8)
Observations were conducted using the Student Behavior Teacher Response Observation Code. After learning the classroom rules, observers watched children in their classrooms for 30 minutes during an academic activity and recorded each time the subject violated a classroom rule. Total classroom rule violations were used as the primary outcome measures for the study.
Endpoint (Week 8)
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Impairment Rating Scale (Parent Completed) at Endpoint
Endpoint (Week 8)
Impairment Rating Scale (Teachers) at Endpoint
Endpoint (Week 8)
Pittsburgh Side Effects Rating Scale (PSERS)(Parent Completed) at Endpoint:
Endpoint (Week 8)
Pittsburgh Side Effects Rating Scale (PSERS)(Teacher Rated):
at weeks 8 (Endpoint)
Disruptive Behavior Disorders Rating Scale ODD Subscale (DBD- Parent Completed) at Endpoint
Endpoint (Week 8)
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Combined therapy
EXPERIMENTALatomoxetine plus behavior therapy
Drug therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORatomoxetine alone
Interventions
open label treatment dosed up to 1.8mg/kg/day
8 week behavioral modification course with school consultation, parenting groups using COPE and child social skills group
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- meet DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for ADHD-combined type;
- estimated IQ of 75 or higher;
- agree to comply with the randomly assigned treatment condition;
- enrolled in full time school at first grade level or higher; AND
- have a primary teacher available to complete ratings for the entire study duration.
You may not qualify if:
- current or past history of seizures (not including benign febrile seizures) or other neurological disorders;
- physical conditions that preclude administration of Strattera or other medical illness that might confound study results or increase the safety risk to subjects exposed to study treatments (i.e. marked cardiac conduction delay, etc.);
- prior failed trial of Strattera defined as 3 weeks or more on a daily dose of Strattera of at least .8mg/kg or a documented inability to tolerate at least .8mg/kg/day;
- serious forms of psychopathology other than ADHD, such autism, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia or any other psychopathology requiring urgent treatment with psychotropic medication; OR
- children for whom discontinuation of their current psychotropic medication would represent a serious risk to themselves or others.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- State University of New York at Buffalolead
- Eli Lilly and Companycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Cennter for Children and Families
Buffalo, New York, 14214, United States
Related Publications (1)
Waxmonsky JG, Waschbusch DA, Pelham WE, Draganac-Cardona L, Rotella B, Ryan L. Effects of atomoxetine with and without behavior therapy on the school and home functioning of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Nov;71(11):1535-51. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09m05496pur. Epub 2010 Jun 29.
PMID: 20673557DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The primary limitation of this study was the lack of a control condition, thereby limiting our ability to detect the causality of observed improvements. Study may not have had sufficient subjects to detect group differences on secondary measures.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- James Waxmonsky M.D.
- Organization
- SUNY Buffalo
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
James G Waxmonsky
SUNY Buffalo
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Daniel A Waschbusch
SUNY Buffalo
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 9, 2009
First Posted
June 11, 2009
Study Start
January 1, 2007
Primary Completion
May 1, 2008
Study Completion
September 1, 2008
Last Updated
October 20, 2020
Results First Posted
April 7, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-10