Trial Between Two Follow up Regimens With Different Test Intensity in Endometrial Cancer Treated Patients
TOTEM
Appropriateness Evaluation of Follow up Procedures in Gynaecology Oncology TOTEM Study: Multicentric Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Between Two Follow up Regimens With Different Tests Intensity in Endometrial Cancer Treated Patients.
1 other identifier
interventional
1,884
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to compare two different follow up regimens with different test intensity in endometrial cancer treated patients. If eligibility criteria are satisfied and the written informed consensus is obtained, patients are stratified inside the centre according to their risk level:
- Group 1 : patients at low risk of recurrence \[stage IA G1 and stage IA G2\]
- Group 2 : patients at high-risk of recurrence \[≥ stage IA G3\] (Ethics Committee amendment of 14th September 2010, use new 2010 FIGO classification for endometrial cancer!) In each group patients will be randomized in two regimens of follow up:
- Minimalist (Arm 1)
- Intensive (Arm 2)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2008
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 8, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 9, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2020
CompletedAugust 2, 2018
August 1, 2018
9.9 years
June 8, 2009
August 1, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Overall survival
Seven years
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Progression-free survival
Seven years
Proportion of complications, second cancers, co-morbidity
Seven years
Proportion of asymptomatic patients with diagnosis of relapse
Seven years
Proportion of subjects who complete the two different regimes follow up
Seven years
Study Arms (2)
Intensive follow up
EXPERIMENTALIntensive follow up in low-risk patients Intensive follow up in high-risk patients
Minimalist follow up
EXPERIMENTALMinimalist follow up in low-risk patients Minimalist follow up in high-risk patients
Interventions
\- First 2 years of FU since the end of primary treatment: clinical visit\* every 4 months; Pap tests; chest, abdomen, pelvis CT every 12 months \- Since the third to the fifth year of FU: clinical visit\* every 6 months; Pap test every 12 months \* clinical visit with gynecological exploration
\- First 3 years of FU since the end of primary treatment: clinical visit\*, Ca125, trans-vaginal and abdominal ultrasound every 4 months (except in conjunction with TC); Pap smear, abdomen, pelvis CT every 12 months \- In the fourth and fifth years of FU: clinical visit\*, Ca125, trans-vaginal and abdominal ultrasound every 6 months (except in conjunction with TC) Pap smear; chest, abdomen, pelvis CT every 12 months \* clinical visit with gynecological exploration
\- First 5 years of FU since the end of primary treatment: clinical visit\* every 6 months. \* clinical visit with gynecological exploration
\- First 2 years of FU since the end of primary treatment: clinical visit\* every 4 months; chest, abdomen, pelvis CT every 12 months \- Since the third to the fifth year of surveillance: clinical visit\* every 6 months. \* clinical visit with gynecological exploration
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients treated surgically for endometrial cancer, if in complete clinical remission confirmed by imaging stage FIGO I-IV
- no previous or concurrent neoplasia (with the exception of carcinoma in situ of the cervix and basalioma of the skin)
- other contemporaneous RCT may be allowed if there is not any restriction concerning follow up
- obtaining a written informed consensus before randomization
- age \> 18 years
You may not qualify if:
- presence of any psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition that could potentially limit the compliance to the protocol and the follow-up planned: all these situations must be discussed with the patient before the randomization
- previous, concurrent or second malignancies endometrial carcinoma in the context of a hereditary syndrome
- conditions which contraindicate medical tests scheduled according to follow-up regimen
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino
Turin, 10100, Italy
Related Publications (7)
Gadducci A, Fuso L, Cosio S, Landoni F, Maggino T, Perotto S, Sartori E, Testa A, Galletto L, Zola P. Are surveillance procedures of clinical benefit for patients treated for ovarian cancer?: A retrospective Italian multicentric study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009 Apr;19(3):367-74. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181a1cc02.
PMID: 19407561BACKGROUNDZanagnolo V, Minig LA, Gadducci A, Maggino T, Sartori E, Zola P, Landoni F. Surveillance procedures for patients for cervical carcinoma: a review of the literature. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009 Apr;19(3):306-13. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181a130f3.
PMID: 19407551BACKGROUNDZola P, Fuso L, Mazzola S, Piovano E, Perotto S, Gadducci A, Galletto L, Landoni F, Maggino T, Raspagliesi F, Sartori E, Scambia G. Could follow-up different modalities play a role in asymptomatic cervical cancer relapses diagnosis? An Italian multicenter retrospective analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Oct;107(1 Suppl 1):S150-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.07.028. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
PMID: 17868785BACKGROUNDZola P, Fuso L, Mazzola S, Gadducci A, Landoni F, Maggino T, Sartori E. Follow-up strategies in gynecological oncology: searching appropriateness. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007 Nov-Dec;17(6):1186-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.00943.x. Epub 2007 Apr 26.
PMID: 17466042BACKGROUNDGadducci A, Cosio S, Zola P, Landoni F, Maggino T, Sartori E. Surveillance procedures for patients treated for epithelial ovarian cancer: a review of the literature. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007 Jan-Feb;17(1):21-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.00826.x.
PMID: 17291227BACKGROUNDRosato R, Ferrero A, Mosconi P, Ciccone G, Di Cuonzo D, Evangelista A, Fuso L, Piovano E, Pagano E, Laudani ME, Pace L, Zola P; TOTEM Collaborative Group. Impact of different follow-up regimens on health-related quality of life and costs in endometrial cancer patients: Results from the TOTEM randomized trial. Gynecol Oncol. 2024 May;184:150-159. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.01.050. Epub 2024 Feb 3.
PMID: 38309033DERIVEDZola P, Ciccone G, Piovano E, Fuso L, Di Cuonzo D, Castiglione A, Pagano E, Peirano E, Landoni F, Sartori E, Narducci F, Bertetto O, Ferrero A; TOTEM Collaborative Group. Effectiveness of Intensive Versus Minimalist Follow-Up Regimen on Survival in Patients With Endometrial Cancer (TOTEM Study): A Randomized, Pragmatic, Parallel Group, Multicenter Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Nov 20;40(33):3817-3827. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00471. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
PMID: 35858170DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Paolo Zola, MD
Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino - University of Turin
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Paolo Zola MD, Study Coordinator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 8, 2009
First Posted
June 9, 2009
Study Start
September 1, 2008
Primary Completion
July 31, 2018
Study Completion
December 1, 2020
Last Updated
August 2, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share