NCT00916708

Brief Summary

This study aims to compare two different follow up regimens with different test intensity in endometrial cancer treated patients. If eligibility criteria are satisfied and the written informed consensus is obtained, patients are stratified inside the centre according to their risk level:

  • Group 1 : patients at low risk of recurrence \[stage IA G1 and stage IA G2\]
  • Group 2 : patients at high-risk of recurrence \[≥ stage IA G3\] (Ethics Committee amendment of 14th September 2010, use new 2010 FIGO classification for endometrial cancer!) In each group patients will be randomized in two regimens of follow up:
  • Minimalist (Arm 1)
  • Intensive (Arm 2)

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
1,884

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2008

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2008

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 8, 2009

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 9, 2009

Completed
9.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 31, 2018

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

August 2, 2018

Status Verified

August 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

9.9 years

First QC Date

June 8, 2009

Last Update Submit

August 1, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

endometrial cancerfollow uprelapse

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Overall survival

    Seven years

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Progression-free survival

    Seven years

  • Proportion of complications, second cancers, co-morbidity

    Seven years

  • Proportion of asymptomatic patients with diagnosis of relapse

    Seven years

  • Proportion of subjects who complete the two different regimes follow up

    Seven years

Study Arms (2)

Intensive follow up

EXPERIMENTAL

Intensive follow up in low-risk patients Intensive follow up in high-risk patients

Procedure: Intensive/Low-Risk follow up (IA G1; IA G2)Procedure: Intensive/High-Risk follow up (≥ IA G3)

Minimalist follow up

EXPERIMENTAL

Minimalist follow up in low-risk patients Minimalist follow up in high-risk patients

Procedure: Minimalist/Low-Risk follow up (IA G1; IA G2)Procedure: Minimalist/High-Risk follow up (≥ IA G3)

Interventions

\- First 2 years of FU since the end of primary treatment: clinical visit\* every 4 months; Pap tests; chest, abdomen, pelvis CT every 12 months \- Since the third to the fifth year of FU: clinical visit\* every 6 months; Pap test every 12 months \* clinical visit with gynecological exploration

Intensive follow up

\- First 3 years of FU since the end of primary treatment: clinical visit\*, Ca125, trans-vaginal and abdominal ultrasound every 4 months (except in conjunction with TC); Pap smear, abdomen, pelvis CT every 12 months \- In the fourth and fifth years of FU: clinical visit\*, Ca125, trans-vaginal and abdominal ultrasound every 6 months (except in conjunction with TC) Pap smear; chest, abdomen, pelvis CT every 12 months \* clinical visit with gynecological exploration

Intensive follow up

\- First 5 years of FU since the end of primary treatment: clinical visit\* every 6 months. \* clinical visit with gynecological exploration

Minimalist follow up

\- First 2 years of FU since the end of primary treatment: clinical visit\* every 4 months; chest, abdomen, pelvis CT every 12 months \- Since the third to the fifth year of surveillance: clinical visit\* every 6 months. \* clinical visit with gynecological exploration

Minimalist follow up

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • patients treated surgically for endometrial cancer, if in complete clinical remission confirmed by imaging stage FIGO I-IV
  • no previous or concurrent neoplasia (with the exception of carcinoma in situ of the cervix and basalioma of the skin)
  • other contemporaneous RCT may be allowed if there is not any restriction concerning follow up
  • obtaining a written informed consensus before randomization
  • age \> 18 years

You may not qualify if:

  • presence of any psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition that could potentially limit the compliance to the protocol and the follow-up planned: all these situations must be discussed with the patient before the randomization
  • previous, concurrent or second malignancies endometrial carcinoma in the context of a hereditary syndrome
  • conditions which contraindicate medical tests scheduled according to follow-up regimen

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino

Turin, 10100, Italy

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Gadducci A, Fuso L, Cosio S, Landoni F, Maggino T, Perotto S, Sartori E, Testa A, Galletto L, Zola P. Are surveillance procedures of clinical benefit for patients treated for ovarian cancer?: A retrospective Italian multicentric study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009 Apr;19(3):367-74. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181a1cc02.

    PMID: 19407561BACKGROUND
  • Zanagnolo V, Minig LA, Gadducci A, Maggino T, Sartori E, Zola P, Landoni F. Surveillance procedures for patients for cervical carcinoma: a review of the literature. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009 Apr;19(3):306-13. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181a130f3.

    PMID: 19407551BACKGROUND
  • Zola P, Fuso L, Mazzola S, Piovano E, Perotto S, Gadducci A, Galletto L, Landoni F, Maggino T, Raspagliesi F, Sartori E, Scambia G. Could follow-up different modalities play a role in asymptomatic cervical cancer relapses diagnosis? An Italian multicenter retrospective analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Oct;107(1 Suppl 1):S150-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.07.028. Epub 2007 Sep 14.

    PMID: 17868785BACKGROUND
  • Zola P, Fuso L, Mazzola S, Gadducci A, Landoni F, Maggino T, Sartori E. Follow-up strategies in gynecological oncology: searching appropriateness. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007 Nov-Dec;17(6):1186-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.00943.x. Epub 2007 Apr 26.

    PMID: 17466042BACKGROUND
  • Gadducci A, Cosio S, Zola P, Landoni F, Maggino T, Sartori E. Surveillance procedures for patients treated for epithelial ovarian cancer: a review of the literature. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007 Jan-Feb;17(1):21-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.00826.x.

    PMID: 17291227BACKGROUND
  • Rosato R, Ferrero A, Mosconi P, Ciccone G, Di Cuonzo D, Evangelista A, Fuso L, Piovano E, Pagano E, Laudani ME, Pace L, Zola P; TOTEM Collaborative Group. Impact of different follow-up regimens on health-related quality of life and costs in endometrial cancer patients: Results from the TOTEM randomized trial. Gynecol Oncol. 2024 May;184:150-159. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.01.050. Epub 2024 Feb 3.

  • Zola P, Ciccone G, Piovano E, Fuso L, Di Cuonzo D, Castiglione A, Pagano E, Peirano E, Landoni F, Sartori E, Narducci F, Bertetto O, Ferrero A; TOTEM Collaborative Group. Effectiveness of Intensive Versus Minimalist Follow-Up Regimen on Survival in Patients With Endometrial Cancer (TOTEM Study): A Randomized, Pragmatic, Parallel Group, Multicenter Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Nov 20;40(33):3817-3827. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00471. Epub 2022 Jul 20.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Endometrial NeoplasmsRecurrence

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Uterine NeoplasmsGenital Neoplasms, FemaleUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsUterine DiseasesGenital Diseases, FemaleFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesGenital DiseasesDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Paolo Zola, MD

    Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino - University of Turin

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Paolo Zola MD, Study Coordinator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 8, 2009

First Posted

June 9, 2009

Study Start

September 1, 2008

Primary Completion

July 31, 2018

Study Completion

December 1, 2020

Last Updated

August 2, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations