Study of TS-022 in Adult Patients With Atopic Dermatitis With Pruritus (POC)
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled Study of the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of TS-022 in Adult Patients With a Diagnosis of Atopic Dermatitis (AD) With Moderate to Very Severe Pruritus
1 other identifier
interventional
122
1 country
15
Brief Summary
The purpose and (primary) objectives of this study are to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of TS-022 in adults with atopic dermatitis who have moderate to very severe pruritus (itching), following a 28-day regimen of twice-daily topical application.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Jun 2009
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
15 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 28, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 4, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 17, 2011
CompletedDecember 1, 2011
November 1, 2011
11 months
May 28, 2009
February 28, 2011
November 30, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Change in Pruritis Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Patient reported outcome of pruritis measurement (0-100 mm/min-max)on a change in visual analog scale
Baseline through Study Day 36 (Visit 7)
Safety and Tolerability of TS-022 Topical Lotion as Measured by Participants Who Demonstrated Adverse Events
Safety assessment of all subjects who received investigational product. Outcome measure is number of subjects with an adverse event. Measures of adverse events in participants included vital signs, laboratory findings, physical exams, electrocardiograms
Baseline through Study Day 36 (Visit 7)
Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Based on a Dermatologist's Evalution of the Change in Subject's Score of Target Treatment Areas
investigator assessment of disease status rated on 0-5 scale (0 = clear to 5 = very severe) based on a change in score from baseline to Study Day 36 (Visit 7)
baseline through Study Day 36 (Visit 7)
Five Point Pruritus Scale for Self-Assessment of Target Treatment Area Based on a Change in Score
self-assessment using a five point scale of pruritus state based on a change in scale from none (0) to very severe (4), interfering with daily or sleep activities. Subjects will complete the Five-Point Pruritus Scale once at Screening (Visit 1), then twice daily beginning at baseline, which occurs on the morning of Study Day -7 (Visit 2), through Study Day 36 (Visit 7)
Baseline, which is Day -7 (Visit 2), through Day 36 (Visit 7)
Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Based on a Change in Score of Eruption in Proportionate Body Surface Areas
The head and neck \[10%\], trunk \[30%\], upper extremities \[20%\] and lower extremities \[40%\] were assessed separately for erythema (E), infiltration/papulation (I), excoriation (Ex) and lichenification (L) represented by a numeric coded value of (0, No eruption) to (6, 90% - 100% eruption). One score given to each part of the body on a scale from 1-6 based on the four attributes (E, I, Ex, L) and then a proportional average is taken to get a total score of 1-6.
baseline through Study Day 36 (Visit 7)
Skindex-29 Questionnaire to Measure the Subject's Overall Quality of Life Based on Activities of Daily Living That Affect Change in Emotion (10 to 50 Points), Symptoms (7 to 35 Points) and Functioning (12 to 60 Points) to Skin Over One Week Period.
Assessment of subject's activities of daily living using the SKINDEX-29 questionnaire to measure the subject's overall quality of life based on a change in scale from baseline. The SKINDEX scoring scale has a range of 29-145. The smaller the number the better the patient feels. The results are the difference of the SKINDEX scoring scale at treatment discharge (day 22) minus baseline (day-7). Hence the results should be negative, as the patient's emotion, symptoms and functioning of the skin should feel better at treatment discharge as opposed to baseline.
Study Day -7 through Study Day 22
Number of Participants Who Had Measurable Pruritis Based on a Visual Horizontal Analog Scale
Pruritis Visual Analog Scale (VAS) based on patient reported outcome of pruritis measurement on a VAS indicating the amount of pruritus (itchiness) experienced from the time of last dose application through the time just before current dose application. Change in pruritus is assessed twice daily beginning at baseline, Study Day -7 (Visit 2), through Study Day 36 (Visit 7). Subjects determine measurable pruritis using a visual horizontal analog scale ranging from "No Itch", even the slightest itch or "Slight Itch", to "Worst Itch Imaginable" to denote the increase in severity of itching.
Baseline through Study Day 36 (Visit 7)
Study Arms (4)
Vehicle
PLACEBO COMPARATORTS-022 0.005% lotion
EXPERIMENTALTS-022 0.010% lotion
EXPERIMENTALTS-022 0.020% lotion
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults, males or females, 18 - 65 years of age at the time of obtaining the written Informed Consent
- Generally healthy subjects, who have no past or present history of any significant and/or newly-diagnosed disease or condition
- A score of 2 (Mild Disease), 3 (Moderate Disease) or 4 (Severe Disease) on the Investigator's Global Assessment of Atopic Dermatitis (IGA) Scale
- A score of 2 (Moderate Pruritus), 3 (Severe Pruritus) or 4 (Very Severe Pruritus) on the Five-Point Pruritus Scale
- Patient satisfies the diagnostic criteria for AD as determined by the criteria of Hanifin and Rajka
- Patient understands the study procedures and agrees to participate in the study by giving written Informed Consent
- Ability to read and understand English and to provide written informed consent and authorization for protected health information disclosure
You may not qualify if:
- Concurrent skin pathology or recent history (within the past 5 years) of a chronic skin disease other than AD
- Use of phototherapy, including exposure to tanning beds, within 28 days of Study Drug application
- Taking systemic immunosuppressive drugs, biologicals, or corticosteroids therapy within (14 days), or topical immunosuppressive drugs or corticosteroid therapy (within 7 days) of Study Drug application
- Females who are planning a pregnancy, who are pregnant, or who are breastfeeding
- Inability or unwillingness to discontinue current AD treatment(s)
- Inability or unwillingness to comply with study visit schedule and/or other study activities as required by the study protocol
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (15)
UCSD
La Jolla, California, 92037, United States
Therapeutics Clinical Research
San Diego, California, 92123, United States
Ameriderm Research
Jacksonville, Florida, 32216, United States
Ameriderm Research
Kissimmee, Florida, 34741, United States
FXM Research
Miramar, Florida, 33027, United States
Ameriderm Research
Ormond Beach, Florida, 32174, United States
Gwinnett Clinical Research
Snellville, Georgia, 30078, United States
Minnesota Clinical Study Center
Fridley, Minnesota, 55432, United States
Comprehensive Clinical Research
Berlin, New Jersey, 08009, United States
Wake Forest University
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States
Haber Dermatology and Cosmetic Surgery, Inc
South Euclid, Ohio, 44118, United States
Oregon Health and Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
J & S Studies
College Station, Texas, 77845, United States
Center for Clinical Studies
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Center for Clinical Studies
Webster, Texas, 77598, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Slower than expected enrollment and a higher than expected screen failure rate.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Fred Henry MS, MPH,
- Organization
- Taisho Pharmaceutical R&D Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Nermina Nakas, MD
Clinsys
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 28, 2009
First Posted
June 4, 2009
Study Start
June 1, 2009
Primary Completion
May 1, 2010
Study Completion
October 1, 2010
Last Updated
December 1, 2011
Results First Posted
November 17, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-11