Models of Screening, Brief Intervention With a Facilitated Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) for Opioid Patients in the Emergency Department
2 other identifiers
interventional
329
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Patients with heroin and prescription opioid dependence are at increased risk for adverse health consequences and often utilize the Emergency Department (ED) as their source of medical care. Screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment has been effective in decreasing high risk behaviors such as alcohol and tobacco use, and unsafe sexual practices. The data on the effectiveness of brief interventions with opioid dependence is limited. This prospective, randomized controlled trial of opioid dependent subjects (N=360) will compare two models of brief intervention with a control condition. ED patients with opioid dependence will be randomized to either: (1)Screening, Brief Intervention with a Facilitated Referral to Treatment (SBIRT); (2) Screening, Brief Intervention with ED initiated Buprenorphine Treatment (SBI+Bup); or (3) standard care (SC) which includes a handout detailing substance abuse treatment centers in the area. The primary outcome will be self-reported engagement in formal substance abuse treatment at 30 days, verified by contact with the treatment program. Other outcomes measured at 30 days, 2, 6 and 12 months include changes in opioid use (self-report and urine toxicology analysis), HIV risk behaviors, and health care service utilization. The three interventions will also be compared on their cost-effectiveness. We will test the hypotheses that SBI+Bup will be superior to SBIRT and SC, and SBIRT will be superior to SC in (1)increasing the proportion of patients engaged in formal substance abuse treatment at 30 days; (2) reducing illicit opioid use; (3) reducing HIV risk behaviors; and (4) reducing health care service utilization. In addition, we hypothesize that the societal costs of SBI+Bup, per number of days of opioid abstinence, will be cost effective relative to SBIRT or SC; and that SBIRT will be cost effective relative to SC. Data analyses will be conducted on the intention to treat sample of randomized patients. This study, conducted by a research team with extensive experience evaluating brief interventions and treatments for opioid dependence, will be unique in its: (1) comparison of two models of brief intervention with standard care; (2) inclusion of an ED initiated treatment arm; (3) use of manual-guided interventions with systematic assessment of adherence and competence; and (4)collection of detailed cost data to help guide future healthcare policy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2008
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 4, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 28, 2015
CompletedMarch 24, 2020
March 1, 2020
4.9 years
June 1, 2009
May 11, 2015
March 12, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Self-reported Engagement in Formal Substance Abuse Treatment at 30 Days (Verified by Contact With the Treatment Program)
Defined as enrollment and receiving formal addiction treatment on the 30th day following randomization. This is assessed by direct contact with facility, clinician, or both.
30 days post randomization
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Days of Self-reported Illicit Opioid Use in the Past 7 Days
30 days post randomization
Study Arms (3)
SC
NO INTERVENTIONStandard Care
SBIRT
EXPERIMENTALScreening, Brief Intervention and Facilitated Referral to Treatment
SBI+Bup
EXPERIMENTALScreening, Brief Intervention and Buprenorphine initiation
Interventions
Brief Negotiation Interview (BNI) is a manual-guided therapy that is designed to be feasible in the ED setting. The purpose of the BNI is to assist patients in recognizing and changing their drug use and HIV risk behaviors. It combines techniques based on motivational interviewing and a stage-model of change. The main goal of the interview is to decrease the subject's ambivalence about signing up for a formal drug treatment program.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who present to the adult ED at Yale-New Haven Hospital (YNHH) who are:
- years or older,
- meet criteria for opioid dependence as measured by the Mini-SCID, and
- have a positive urine toxicology for opiates.
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to read or understand English
- Currently receiving formal substance abuse treatment
- Current suicide or homicidal risk
- Current psychotic disorder
- Life-threatening or unstable medical or psychiatric condition requiring hospital admission
- Unable to provide 2 phone contact numbers
- Unwilling to be randomized and/or follow up as per study protocol, including release of information to assess treatment engagement at 30-days
- Requiring opioid agonist medication for a pain-related diagnosis (contraindication to buprenorphine)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Yale Universitylead
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)collaborator
Study Sites (2)
Yale University
New Haven, Connecticut, 06510, United States
Yale University School of Medicine
New Haven, Connecticut, 06519, United States
Related Publications (4)
D'Onofrio G, O'Connor PG, Pantalon MV, Chawarski MC, Busch SH, Owens PH, Bernstein SL, Fiellin DA. Emergency department-initiated buprenorphine/naloxone treatment for opioid dependence: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015 Apr 28;313(16):1636-44. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.3474.
PMID: 25919527RESULTBusch SH, Fiellin DA, Chawarski MC, Owens PH, Pantalon MV, Hawk K, Bernstein SL, O'Connor PG, D'Onofrio G. Cost-effectiveness of emergency department-initiated treatment for opioid dependence. Addiction. 2017 Nov;112(11):2002-2010. doi: 10.1111/add.13900. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
PMID: 28815789RESULTD'Onofrio G, Chawarski MC, O'Connor PG, Pantalon MV, Busch SH, Owens PH, Hawk K, Bernstein SL, Fiellin DA. Emergency Department-Initiated Buprenorphine for Opioid Dependence with Continuation in Primary Care: Outcomes During and After Intervention. J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Jun;32(6):660-666. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-3993-2. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
PMID: 28194688RESULTNielsen S, Tse WC, Larance B. Opioid agonist treatment for people who are dependent on pharmaceutical opioids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 5;9(9):CD011117. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011117.pub3.
PMID: 36063082DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Gail D'Onofrio, MD, MS
- Organization
- Yale University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gail D'Onofrio, MD, MS
Yale University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 1, 2009
First Posted
June 4, 2009
Study Start
September 1, 2008
Primary Completion
August 1, 2013
Study Completion
December 1, 2014
Last Updated
March 24, 2020
Results First Posted
May 28, 2015
Record last verified: 2020-03