Study Stopped
Loss of funding
Enhancing Detection of Small Esophageal Varices by PillCam ESO
A New Technique to Enhance Detection of Small Esophageal Varices by PillCam ESO Capsule Endoscopy
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Increasing intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) with an abdominal binder will increase pressure within smaller esophageal varices which will therefore enhance the ability of capsule endoscopy to detect these varices better. Therefore, the aims of the investigators' study are as follows:
- 1.To determine if using an abdominal binder to increase IAP can increase the detection rate of small esophageal varices when using capsule endoscopy.
- 2.To determine if using an abdominal binder to increase IAP during capsule endoscopy has a comparable detection rate of small esophageal varices to conventional endoscopy.
Trial Health
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 29, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 1, 2009
CompletedJune 19, 2015
June 1, 2015
May 29, 2009
June 18, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Detection rate of esophageal varices using different screening modalities.
30 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Patient tolerability of each screening modality.
1 day
Study Arms (3)
Screening esophagoduodenoscopy (EGD)
ACTIVE COMPARATOREGD will be performed utilizing conscious sedation. During EGD, the endoscopist will capture pictures of the esophageal body, Z-line, lower esophagus and proximal gastric folds. Grading of esophageal varices will be performed by all investigators using the Italian Liver cirrhosis project. Patients who are found to have small grade varices and meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be enrolled in the study.
Capsule Endoscopy
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe capsule endoscope will be swallowed by the participant with 100cc of water and simethicone in the supine position. Recording is done for 2 minute in this position and then the head will be elevated to 30 degrees for 2 minutes and then 60 degrees for 1 minute. After 1 minute, the patient will sip10cc of water and after 15 seconds, they will sit upright and sip water again. They can then walk and resume normal activity for 15 minutes. The videos will be reviewed and graded by a gastroenterologist experienced with capsule endoscopy and will be blinded to the patient's clinical and procedural history as well as the most recent EGD. The varices will be graded using the Given Imaging software that grades varices as no varices (C0), small varices or \< 25% of esophageal circumference (C1), and large varices or \> 25% of esophageal circumference (C2).
Capsule Endoscopy with abdominal binder
ACTIVE COMPARATORBefore swallowing the capsule endoscope, an inflatable girdle is wrapped around the waist above the umbilicus and held in place by a an abdominal binder. The pressure is increased by 10mmHg for 10 minutes. The PillCam ESO is placed in the mouth and the patient is asked to swallow it with 100cc of water with simethicone in the supine position. Recording is done for 2 minute in this position and then the head is elevated to 30 degrees for 2 minutes and then 60 degrees for 1 minute. After 1 minute, the patient sips 10cc of water and after 15 seconds, they sit upright and sip water again. They can then walk and resume normal activity for 15 minutes.
Interventions
The capsule endoscope is placed in the mouth and the patient is asked to swallow it with 100cc of water with simethicone in the supine position. Recording is done for 2 minute in this position and then the head is elevated to 30 degrees for 2 minutes and then 60 degrees for 1 minute. After 1 minute, the patient sips 10cc of water and after 15 seconds, they sit upright and sip water again. They can then walk and resume normal activity for 15 minutes.
Patients will undergo conventional EGD under conscious sedation for routine screening of esophageal varices.
An abdominal binder with and inflatable girdle is wrapped around the stomach prior to swallowing the capsule endoscope. The girdle is inflated to 10mmHg for 10 minutes. The capsule is swallowed by the patient and the routine method for the procedure is performed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients identified with grade I and grade II esophageal varices by conventional endoscopy who are returning for screening or surveillance
- patients who have had endoscopic banding of varices in the past
- patients aged 18 years or older
- patients able to give consent
- patients eligible and willing to undergo upper endoscopy and PillCam ESO capsule endoscopy
You may not qualify if:
- dysphagia
- Zenker's diverticulum
- pregnancy
- esophageal stricture
- gastric or intestinal obstruction
- multiple abdominal surgeries
- cardiac pacemakers
- implanted electronic medical devices
- cognitive impairment
- also, patients found to have bleeding, requiring banding, or other complications on screening EGD the day of the trial will not proceed to capsule endoscopy
- urine pregnancy test will be conducted prior to participation; this is part of the standard procedure for women of child-bearing age undergoing upper endoscopy in the GI lab
- all patients being evaluated for the current study will be evaluated for the presence or absence of overt portosystemic encephalopathy:
- Those found to have overt portosystemic encephalopathy will then be graded based on the standard scale of grade 1 through 4 portosystemic encephalopathy. Assessment of whether patients with liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma possess decisional capacity is essentially the same as for other subjects with the exception that due diligence must be used to address whether there is any evidence of active ongoing overt portosystemic encephalopathy. From the available data and current standards of care, patients with stage 1 overt hepatic encephalopathy are decisional but may have minimal impairment in their cognitive skills particularly in the domains of attention and sleep. Decisional capacity in patients with grades 2-4 overt portosystemic encephalopathy is impaired and will lead to them bring excluded from the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Medical College of Wisconsinlead
- Medtronic - MITGcollaborator
Related Publications (13)
D'Amico G, Pagliaro L, Bosch J. Pharmacological treatment of portal hypertension: an evidence-based approach. Semin Liver Dis. 1999;19(4):475-505. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1007133.
PMID: 10643630BACKGROUNDChristensen E, Fauerholdt L, Schlichting P, Juhl E, Poulsen H, Tygstrup N. Aspects of the natural history of gastrointestinal bleeding in cirrhosis and the effect of prednisone. Gastroenterology. 1981 Nov;81(5):944-52.
PMID: 7026343BACKGROUNDGrace ND, Groszmann RJ, Garcia-Tsao G, Burroughs AK, Pagliaro L, Makuch RW, Bosch J, Stiegmann GV, Henderson JM, de Franchis R, Wagner JL, Conn HO, Rodes J. Portal hypertension and variceal bleeding: an AASLD single topic symposium. Hepatology. 1998 Sep;28(3):868-80. doi: 10.1002/hep.510280339. No abstract available.
PMID: 9731585BACKGROUNDde Franchis R. Updating consensus in portal hypertension: report of the Baveno III Consensus Workshop on definitions, methodology and therapeutic strategies in portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2000 Nov;33(5):846-52. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(00)80320-7. No abstract available.
PMID: 11097497BACKGROUNDAssy N, Rosser BG, Grahame GR, Minuk GY. Risk of sedation for upper GI endoscopy exacerbating subclinical hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999 Jun;49(6):690-4. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(99)70283-x.
PMID: 10343210BACKGROUNDSaeian K, Staff D, Knox J, Binion D, Townsend W, Dua K, Shaker R. Unsedated transnasal endoscopy: a new technique for accurately detecting and grading esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Sep;97(9):2246-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05906.x.
PMID: 12358240BACKGROUNDEisen GM, Eliakim R, Zaman A, Schwartz J, Faigel D, Rondonotti E, Villa F, Weizman E, Yassin K, deFranchis R. The accuracy of PillCam ESO capsule endoscopy versus conventional upper endoscopy for the diagnosis of esophageal varices: a prospective three-center pilot study. Endoscopy. 2006 Jan;38(1):31-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-921189.
PMID: 16429352BACKGROUNDLapalus MG, Dumortier J, Fumex F, Roman S, Lot M, Prost B, Mion F, Ponchon T. Esophageal capsule endoscopy versus esophagogastroduodenoscopy for evaluating portal hypertension: a prospective comparative study of performance and tolerance. Endoscopy. 2006 Jan;38(1):36-41. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-924975.
PMID: 16429353BACKGROUNDPena LR, Cox T, Koch AG, Bosch A. Study comparing oesophageal capsule endoscopy versus EGD in the detection of varices. Dig Liver Dis. 2008 Mar;40(3):216-23. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2007.10.022. Epub 2007 Dec 21.
PMID: 18082473BACKGROUNDde Franchis R, Eisen GM, Laine L, Fernandez-Urien I, Herrerias JM, Brown RD, Fisher L, Vargas HE, Vargo J, Thompson J, Eliakim R. Esophageal capsule endoscopy for screening and surveillance of esophageal varices in patients with portal hypertension. Hepatology. 2008 May;47(5):1595-603. doi: 10.1002/hep.22227.
PMID: 18435461BACKGROUNDMerli M, Nicolini G, Angeloni S, Rinaldi V, De Santis A, Merkel C, Attili AF, Riggio O. Incidence and natural history of small esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients. J Hepatol. 2003 Mar;38(3):266-72. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(02)00420-8.
PMID: 12586291BACKGROUNDLuca A, Cirera I, Garcia-Pagan JC, Feu F, Pizcueta P, Bosch J, Rodes J. Hemodynamic effects of acute changes in intra-abdominal pressure in patients with cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 1993 Jan;104(1):222-7. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(93)90855-7.
PMID: 8419245BACKGROUNDEscorsell A, Gines A, Llach J, Garcia-Pagan JC, Bordas JM, Bosch J, Rodes J. Increasing intra-abdominal pressure increases pressure, volume, and wall tension in esophageal varices. Hepatology. 2002 Oct;36(4 Pt 1):936-40. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.35817.
PMID: 12297841BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Kia Saeian, MD
Medical College of Wisconsin
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mukund Venu, MD
Medical College of Wisconsin
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 29, 2009
First Posted
June 1, 2009
Last Updated
June 19, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-06