Study Stopped
Low Accrual
Pilot Study of a Catheter-based Ultrasound Hyperthermia System
3 other identifiers
interventional
13
1 country
1
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Hyperthermia therapy kills tumor cells by heating them to several degrees above normal body temperature. Ultrasound energy may be able to kill tumor cells by heating up the tumor cells without affecting the surrounding tissue. Implant radiation therapy uses radioactive material placed directly into or near a tumor to kill tumor cells. Giving ultrasound hyperthermia therapy after implant radiation therapy may kill more tumor cells. PURPOSE: This clinical trial is studying ultrasound hyperthermia therapy to see how well it works after implant radiation therapy in treating patients with Stage III/IV cancer of the cervix or prostate cancer with a rising prostate specific antigen (PSA) after prior local therapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2009
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 29, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 18, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 23, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 23, 2020
CompletedJuly 7, 2021
June 1, 2021
10.6 years
May 29, 2009
June 30, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Frequency of treatment-related toxicities by treatment type
All patients treated with at least one hyperthermia session will be included in the safety analysis. The frequency by grade for all treatment-related adverse events will be tabulated by type as classified in NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3 and presented separately for the first and second hyperthermia treatments.
Up to 3 months
Frequency of treatment-related toxicities by accrual plan
All patients treated with at least one hyperthermia session will be included in the safety analysis. The frequency by grade for all treatment-related adverse events will be tabulated by type as classified in NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3 presented for the 2 subsets of patients corresponding to the plan for accrual: the first 3 patients with gynecologic cancer, then the final 9 patients with gynecologic cancer; and the first 3 patients with prostate cancer, then the final 9 patients with prostate cancer
Up to 3 months
Proportion of patients treated according to the specified temperature and timing criteria.
The feasibility of administering hyperthermia to patients receiving standard brachytherapy will be summarized by the proportion of patients completing the treatment as planned. The proportion and 95% confidence interval will be calculated for each of the two hyperthermia sessions
Up to 4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Average maximum prostate temperature (Tmax)
Up to 4 weeks
Minimum temperature (Tmin)
Up to 4 weeks
Median temperature (T50)
Up to 4 weeks
Number of times temperature exceeded by 90% of the measured temperature points (T90)
Up to 4 weeks
Cumulative Equivalent Minutes at 43 degree celsius (ÂșC) for 90% of the measured points (CEM43T90)
Up to 4 weeks
Study Arms (1)
Hyperthermia with HDR brachytherapy
EXPERIMENTALHyperthermia will be delivered within approximately 2 hours of (HDR) brachytherapy associated with the implant session
Interventions
Single course of Catheter-based Ultrasound Hyperthermia (within approximately 2 hours of a Standard-of-care High Dose Rate (HDR) Brachytherapy)
Completion of standard-of-care high dose rate (HDR) Brachytherapy treatments (radiation fractions) using Session #1 catheter implants
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who are to be given HDR brachytherapy for treatment of solid tumor of the following:
- Cervical cancer Stage III or IV OR
- Prostate cancer (with rising prostate specific antigen after prior local therapy)
- Age \>=18 years
- Eligible for brachytherapy as determined per clinical standard of care.
- Ability to give written informed consent and willingness to comply with the requirements of the protocol
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who are not candidates for HDR brachytherapy
- Any condition that compromises compliance with the objectives and procedures of this protocol, as judged by the principal investigator
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94143-1708, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
I-Chow J. Hsu, MD
University of California, San Francisco
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DEVICE FEASIBILITY
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor, Radiation Oncology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 29, 2009
First Posted
June 1, 2009
Study Start
December 18, 2009
Primary Completion
July 23, 2020
Study Completion
July 23, 2020
Last Updated
July 7, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share