Efficacy of Eductyl® Versus Placebo for Treatment of Dyschesia
Eductyl
Comparative, Randomized, Double-blind Study of the Efficacy of Eductyl® Versus Placebo for Treatment of Patients With Dyschesia Treated by Rectal Rehabilitation
2 other identifiers
interventional
306
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of Eductyl versus placebo for treatment of patients with dyschesia treated by rectal rehabilitation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started May 2009
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 29, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2012
CompletedMarch 19, 2014
March 1, 2014
2.6 years
May 29, 2009
March 18, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To assess the efficacy of Eductyl versus placebo for treatment of patients with dyschesia treated by rectal rehabilitation on VAS of intensity of symptoms
Day -7, 0, 3, 7, 10, 14, 17, and 21
Secondary Outcomes (1)
To assess the efficacy on change symptoms and safety of Eductyl versus placebo for treatment of patients with dyschesia treated by rectal rehabilitation
Day 0 and 21
Study Arms (2)
Eductyl suppository
EXPERIMENTALPlacebo suppository
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female over 18 years
- Patients with dyschesia
- Prescription of rehabilitation for dyschesia
You may not qualify if:
- Rectal diseases
- Pain killers
- Pregnant women
- Breast feeding patients
- Non-compliant patients
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Diaconesses Hospital
Paris, 75012, France
Related Publications (1)
Cotelle O, Cargill G, Marty MM, Bueno L, Cappelletti MC, Colangeli-Hagege H, Savarieau B, Ducrotte P. A concomitant treatment by CO2-releasing suppositories improves the results of anorectal biofeedback training in patients with dyschezia: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Jun;57(6):781-9. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000098.
PMID: 24807604DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Odile Cotelle, Dr
Diaconesses hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 29, 2009
First Posted
June 1, 2009
Study Start
May 1, 2009
Primary Completion
December 1, 2011
Study Completion
June 1, 2012
Last Updated
March 19, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-03