Validation of a Real-time Urodynamic Measure of Urinary Urgency
1 other identifier
interventional
51
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Urinary urgency is a key symptom of overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) and may be more bothersome to a patient than the symptom of urinary frequency. Unfortunately, controversy continues to surround the term 'urgency' and there is no good tool to evaluate the severity of urgency. This fact has constrained the performance of clinical research in this field. The cause of urinary urgency is not fully understood and may vary from patient to patient. Although clinicians regularly obtain measures of bladder sensation during cystometry, little attention has been paid to the patient experience of urinary urgency. In this study, the researchers will use a non-significant risk device (i.e., an Urgeometer) to measure urinary urgency in women with overactive bladder.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jan 2007
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 26, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 28, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 24, 2017
CompletedMay 24, 2017
April 1, 2017
1.5 years
May 26, 2009
August 21, 2009
April 18, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Maximal Cystometric Capacity (mL)
At baseline, a small catheter is placed inside the participant's bladder. The bladder is filled with sterile water through the catheter and participants' maximal tolerated cystometric capacity (MCC) is measured in milliliters. Following completion of the bladder test, participants take 10mg solifenacin succinate (VesicareR) daily for 30 days. After 30 days of treatment, participants repeat the bladder test. Change in the MCC is used to evaluate the effectiveness of the drug.
30 Days
Study Arms (1)
Solifenacin Succinate
EXPERIMENTALThe intervention for this study is 10mg daily solifenacin. Patients with overactive bladder syndrome will take this study drug for 30 days.
Interventions
Participants take 10mg daily solifenacin succinate for 30 days
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Have symptoms of urge or mixed incontinence (urge predominant) and desire treatment with anticholinergic medication.
- Demonstrated detrusor overactivity with or without incontinence during urodynamic testing.
- Are able to consent and fill out study documents, complete repeated urodynamic testing, and follow-up in 4 weeks.
You may not qualify if:
- Have been treated with any anticholinergic medication in the previous month.
- Have an elevated post -void residual volume as determined during their routine clinical care.
- Have had a urinary tract infection in the last month, as determined by history.
- Have untreated narrow angle glaucoma, by patient history.
- Have a known allergy or intolerance to solifenacin, as determined by patient history.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Loyola Universitylead
- Astellas Pharma Inccollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Loyola University Medical Center
Maywood, Illinois, 60153, United States
Related Publications (5)
Craggs MD. Objective measurement of bladder sensation: use of a new patient-activated device and response to neuromodulation. BJU Int. 2005 Sep;96 Suppl 1:29-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05649.x.
PMID: 16086677BACKGROUNDOliver S, Fowler C, Mundy A, Craggs M. Measuring the sensations of urge and bladder filling during cystometry in urge incontinence and the effects of neuromodulation. Neurourol Urodyn. 2003;22(1):7-16. doi: 10.1002/nau.10082.
PMID: 12478595BACKGROUNDAbrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, Van Kerrebroeck P, Victor A, Wein A; Standardisation Sub-Committee of the International Continence Society. The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology. 2003 Jan;61(1):37-49. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02243-4. No abstract available.
PMID: 12559262BACKGROUNDBarber MD, Kuchibhatla MN, Pieper CF, Bump RC. Psychometric evaluation of 2 comprehensive condition-specific quality of life instruments for women with pelvic floor disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Dec;185(6):1388-95. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.118659.
PMID: 11744914BACKGROUNDHerzog AR, Diokno AC, Fultz NH. Urinary incontinence: medical and psychosocial aspects. Annu Rev Gerontol Geriatr. 1989;9:74-119. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-40455-3_3.
PMID: 2514773BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The trial experienced significant attrition. Otherwise, there are no limitations or caveats to report.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Mary P FitzGerald
- Organization
- Loyola University Chicago
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mary P FitzGerald, MD
Loyola University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 26, 2009
First Posted
May 28, 2009
Study Start
January 1, 2007
Primary Completion
July 1, 2008
Study Completion
February 1, 2009
Last Updated
May 24, 2017
Results First Posted
May 24, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Due to restrictions on the availability of individual participant data (IPD), IPD are not publicly available