NCT00908245

Brief Summary

To evaluate the accuracy of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) as a protective maneuver against ischemia/reperfusion lesion in patients undergoing major liver resection with intermittent portal triad Clamping (IPTC). Summary Background Data: For sake of safety and to avoid excessive blood loss during parenchymal transection, vascular inflow occlusion is an effective trick but may cause ischemic damage to the remnant liver and can lead to liver failure in case of chronic liver disease. IPTC has been proven to be superior to continuous hepatic pedicle clamping as it preserve liver remnant from severe ischemia/reperfusion lesion, so does IPC. Yet, if IPC is beneficial if liver resection is performed under IPTC has never been demonstrated in a randomised controlled trial (RCT). The investigators designed a RCT to assess the impact of IPC in patient undergoing major liver resection with intermittent vascular inflow occlusion.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
81

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2003

Longer than P75 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2003

Completed
3.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2007

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2008

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 22, 2009

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 25, 2009

Completed
Last Updated

November 20, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3.8 years

First QC Date

May 22, 2009

Last Update Submit

November 17, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

PreconditioningHepatectomyClamping

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The primary outcome was a 50% reduction of transaminases (AST, ALT) level on postoperative day 1 in the preconditioning group.

    24 hours

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Surgical mortality during the postoperative 3 months

    3 months

  • Surgical and medical morbidity during the postoperative 3 months

    3 months

  • Biological follow up during 3 months

    3 months

Study Arms (2)

Preconditioning

EXPERIMENTAL

Surgery with ischemic preconditioning

Procedure: Preconditioning ischemia

Control

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Surgery without preconditioning ischemia

Procedure: Control

Interventions

ControlPROCEDURE

Surgery without preconditioning surgery

Also known as: Surgery without preconditioning surgery
Control

Surgery with a preconditioning ischemia

Also known as: Surgery with a preconditioning ischemia
Preconditioning

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • patients' age ≥ 18 years old,
  • liver resection of 3 segments (as described by Couinaud) or more,
  • posterior lesionectomy (segment VI and VII),
  • liver resection only or associated with a primary digestive or biliary tumor.
  • Portal vein embolisation allowed

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with cirrhosis,
  • synchronous radiofrequency or cryotherapy ablation,
  • undergoing segmentectomy,
  • left lateral lesionectomy or laparoscopic liver resection,
  • pregnant women

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hopital Cochin

Paris, 75014, France

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Scatton O, Zalinski S, Jegou D, Compagnon P, Lesurtel M, Belghiti J, Boudjema K, Lentschener C, Soubrane O. Randomized clinical trial of ischaemic preconditioning in major liver resection with intermittent Pringle manoeuvre. Br J Surg. 2011 Sep;98(9):1236-43. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7626. Epub 2011 Jul 11.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Surgical Procedures, Operative

Study Officials

  • Olivier Scatton, MD, PhD

    Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 22, 2009

First Posted

May 25, 2009

Study Start

September 1, 2003

Primary Completion

June 1, 2007

Study Completion

December 1, 2008

Last Updated

November 20, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-09

Locations