NCT00907842

Brief Summary

Knowing that the risk of stoma associated herniation (parastomal or incisional) is 30-50% and the associated morbidity significant, standard placement of a prophylactic mesh upon stoma creation might prevent parastomal (or incisional herniation, after closure) and improve the quality of life of a large group of patients. This study is meant to be a pilot study to see whether the mesh related risks of infection and adhesion morbidity are acceptable if the mesh is placed intraperitoneally.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
10

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2010

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 21, 2009

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 25, 2009

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2010

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2013

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

April 8, 2013

Status Verified

April 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

May 21, 2009

Last Update Submit

April 5, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

stoma

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • postoperative complications after prophylactic mesh placement around a stoma (i.e., infection of the mesh and adhesions to the mesh)

    one year after placement

  • incisional herniation at the old stoma wound

    two years

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • stoma complications (stenosis, bulging, prolapse, retraction, skin problems)

    two years after placement

Study Arms (1)

mesh placement

EXPERIMENTAL
Device: Parietex Parastomal Mesh

Interventions

mesh placed intraperitoneally around the stoma

mesh placement

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patients with a life expectancy of at least one year
  • Temporary stoma formation
  • Signed informed consent
  • Elective surgery
  • Clean-contaminated abdomen

You may not qualify if:

  • American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score IV or above
  • Incapacitated adult or no signed informed consent
  • Emergency procedure
  • Contaminated or infected abdomen
  • Residual intraperitoneal mesh
  • Already injured part of the abdominal wall where the stoma will be sited
  • Contraindication to laparoscopy
  • Longterm use of corticosteroids and other immunosuppressive agents
  • Current antibiotic therapy
  • One of the following conditions: immune deficiency, chemotherapy, ascites, peritoneal dialysis, pregnancy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Maastricht University Medical Centre

Maastricht, 6200 AZ, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Janes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Preventing parastomal hernia with a prosthetic mesh: a 5-year follow-up of a randomized study. World J Surg. 2009 Jan;33(1):118-21; discussion 122-3. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9785-4.

    PMID: 19011935BACKGROUND
  • Cingi A, Cakir T, Sever A, Aktan AO. Enterostomy site hernias: a clinical and computerized tomographic evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Oct;49(10):1559-63. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0681-4.

    PMID: 17120189BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Incisional Hernia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

HerniaPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPostoperative ComplicationsPathologic Processes

Study Officials

  • Nicole Bouvy, MD, PhD

    Maastricht University Medical Centre

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Marc Schreinemacher, MD

    Maastricht University Medical Centre

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 21, 2009

First Posted

May 25, 2009

Study Start

April 1, 2010

Primary Completion

February 1, 2013

Study Completion

April 1, 2013

Last Updated

April 8, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-04

Locations