Self Expanding Nitinol Stent Versus Percutaneous Transluminal Arterial Angioplasty (PTA) With Optional Bailout Stenting in Case of PTA Failure in Patients With Symptomatic Critical Limb Ischemia or Severe Intermittent Claudication (EXPAND)
EXPAND
EXPAND Study - Self Expanding Nitinol Stent Versus PTA With Optional Bailout Stenting in Case of PTA Failure in Patients With Symptomatic Critical Limb Ischemia or Severe Intermittent Claudication. A Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized Clinical Trail With Follow-up Investigations at 1, 3, 6, and 12 Months.
1 other identifier
interventional
94
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The clinical investigation is a prospective, international, multi-centre, randomized (1:1) trial with follow up investigations at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. Patients will be randomized either to treatment with stenting with the Astron Pulsar SE (4 or 5 mm diameter) stent or to PTA with optional bailout stenting in case of PTA failure. The primary objective of this study is to show clinical improvement in the outcome of patients with symptomatic critical limb ischemia or severe intermittent claudication (Rutherford 3, 4, 5) treated with the Astron Pulsar SE (4 or 5 mm diameter) in comparison with PTA or optional bailout stenting in case of PTA failure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started May 2009
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 20, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 21, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2013
CompletedFebruary 9, 2015
February 1, 2015
3.7 years
May 20, 2009
February 6, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rate of sustained clinical improvement at 12 months follow up. Sustained clinical improvement is defined as: Upward shift of at least +1 (for Rutherford category 3) or +2 (for Rutherford categories 4 and 5) on the Rutherford scale.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
MAE rate, amputation rate, mortality rate, Maximum Walking Distance and Pain Free Walking Distance, Quality of Life, Binary restenosis rate, technical and device success, hemodynamic outcome
6 and 12 months
Study Arms (2)
Astron Pulsar Stent
EXPERIMENTALDevice: Astron Pulsar Stent
PTA alone
ACTIVE COMPARATORDevice: Balloon angioplasty alone
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age \> 50 years
- Patient has signed the patient informed consent.
- Patient is willing to adhere to the follow up time points and to follow the requirements during the study
- Patient has symptomatic critical limb ischemia or severe intermittent claudication classified as Rutherford category 3, 4 or 5.
- Stenotic (\> 50%) or occlusive atherosclerotic disease of the infrapopliteal arteries below the radiographic level of the knee joint and above the level of the ankle (includes the peroneotibial trunk, anterior tibial artery, posterior tibial artery and peroneal artery, excludes the popliteal artery), as determined by pre-procedure intra-arterial DSA (preferred) or conventional angiography.
- Target (study) lesion to be treated is a de novo lesion (lesion ≤ 190 mm length). NOTE: Multiple or diffused lesion treatment is allowed as long as total lesion length ≤ 190 mm)
- Reference vessel diameter is between 2.5 and 4.0 mm.
- Target vessel: It must be possible to follow the vessel run-off to the foot and/or the wound area. NOTE: Patients with incomplete or abnormal anatomical run-off are NOT excluded. Important is to see that the there is a run-off to the foot and/or wound area even if collaterals are involved.
- Haemodynamically significant inflow stenoses of vessels above the knee were successfully treated before.
- Lesions must be crossed successfully with a guide wire and guide wire must be within the true lumen of the distal vessel.
- Notes:
- Target vessel has to be defined; Target vessel = vessel with target lesion to be treated
- NON-target vessel(s): haemodynamically significant lesion can be treated according to investigator's discretion
You may not qualify if:
- Patient refuses treatment.
- Patient is legally, physically or mentally unable to give consent.
- ABI / TBI measurement is impossible.
- Target lesion is pre-treated.
- Target lesion lies within or adjacent to an aneurysm.
- Acute thrombus present in the target limb.
- The reference vessel diameter is not suitable for available stent size (RVD \< 2.5 and \> 4.0 mm).
- Length of lesion requires more than one treatment device (lesion length \> 190 mm)
- Hybrid technique (bypass surgery and peripheral intervention with PTA or stent during the same session) is not allowed. Note: Allowed is if the patient got a P1 or P3 bypass in a previous session and it is possible to treat a distal lesion through that bypass in a separate session. Time window between bypass surgery and planned intervention must be at least 30 days.
- Life-expectancy less than 12 months at the time of screening.
- Patient has a known allergy to heparin, aspirin, clopidogrel or other anticoagulant/ antiplatelet therapies, to nickel or contrast media or is unwilling to tolerate such therapies.
- Patient has bleeding diatheses
- Patient is currently enrolled in another investigational device or drug trial.
- Patient took part in another investigational device or drug trial within 3 months prior to screening.
- Patient is currently breast-feeding, pregnant or intends to become pregnant.
- +5 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Biotronik AGlead
Study Sites (1)
Gefässzentrum Berlin, Evangelisches Krankenhaus KEH
Berlin, 10365, Germany
Related Publications (1)
Schulte KL, Pilger E, Schellong S, Tan KT, Baumann F, Langhoff R, Torsello G, Zeller T, Amendt K, Brodmann M; EXPAND Investigators. Primary Self-EXPANDing Nitinol Stenting vs Balloon Angioplasty With Optional Bailout Stenting for the Treatment of Infrapopliteal Artery Disease in Patients With Severe Intermittent Claudication or Critical Limb Ischemia (EXPAND Study). J Endovasc Ther. 2015 Oct;22(5):690-7. doi: 10.1177/1526602815598955. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
PMID: 26245919DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 20, 2009
First Posted
May 21, 2009
Study Start
May 1, 2009
Primary Completion
January 1, 2013
Study Completion
January 1, 2013
Last Updated
February 9, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-02