Single Port Access (SPA) Cholecystectomy Versus Standard Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Single Port Access Cholecystectomy Versus Standard Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy - Randomized Study
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: Single port access surgery is a rapidly progressing surgical approach which allows performance of standard laparoscopic surgery through a single transparietal port instead of multiple port accesses. Objective: Demonstrate the validity of Single port access (SPA) cholecystectomy compared to multiple ports laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Hypothesis: SPA cholecystectomy is associated with decreased parietal and body image trauma compare to multiple ports laparoscopic cholecystectomy. SPA cholecystectomy should be associated with better cosmetic results, may improve postoperative recovery due to lower parietal pain. SPA cholecystectomy may also be associated with decreased rate of parietal complications as lower numbers of transparietal port are placed. Methods: All patients offered cholecystectomy, either SPA or multiport cholecystectomy, included in the study will have recognized biliary pathology for which formal indication cholecystectomy are recognized internationally. Surgical technique, either for SPA cholecystectomy or for multiple ports cholecystectomy, will be the same except, that one surgical technique is achieved through a single transparietal port and the other through multiple ports. Randomization will be performed before surgeries after patients have given their informed consent to the study. No specific test or cost will be necessitated by the study. Patients will be informed orally and will receive a short study summary, allowing them to give an informed consent. Endpoints:
- Morbidity
- Body image and Cosmetic results
- Post-operative pain (opioid sparing effect)
- Operative time
- Hospital stay
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 19, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 20, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2011
CompletedMay 20, 2009
May 1, 2009
2 years
May 19, 2009
May 19, 2009
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Cosmesis, body image and quality of life scale
at 1 month
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Post-operative morbidity
at 30 days
Post-operative pain
10 days
Operative time
day 1
Study Arms (2)
1
OTHERSPA cholecystectomy
2
OTHERlaparoscopic cholecystectomy
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age more than 18 years
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindication to laparoscopy
- Liver disease
- Cognitive trouble
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital Geneva
Geneva, Canton of Geneva, 1211, Switzerland
Related Publications (3)
Bucher P, Pugin F, Buchs N, Ostermann S, Charara F, Morel P. Single port access laparoscopic cholecystectomy (with video). World J Surg. 2009 May;33(5):1015-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9874-4.
PMID: 19116734BACKGROUNDBucher P, Pugin F, Buchs NC, Ostermann S, Morel P. Randomized clinical trial of laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2011 Dec;98(12):1695-702. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7689. Epub 2011 Sep 30.
PMID: 21964736DERIVEDSteinemann DC, Raptis DA, Lurje G, Oberkofler CE, Wyss R, Zehnder A, Lesurtel M, Vonlanthen R, Clavien PA, Breitenstein S. Cosmesis and body image after single-port laparoscopic or conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multicenter double blinded randomised controlled trial (SPOCC-trial). BMC Surg. 2011 Sep 12;11:24. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-11-24.
PMID: 21910897DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pascal Bucher, MD
University Hospital, Geneva
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 19, 2009
First Posted
May 20, 2009
Study Start
February 1, 2009
Primary Completion
February 1, 2011
Last Updated
May 20, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-05