Functional Evaluation of a Standard and a High-flexion Knee Prosthesis Using Thigh-calf Contact Force Measurements
In-vivo Study Investigating the Difference in Functional Outcome Between Two Types of Knee Prostheses: the Sigma FB (Depuy, J&J, UK; Standard Implant) and the Sigma RP-F (Depuy, J&J, UK; High-flexion Implant)
1 other identifier
interventional
67
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate whether subjects receiving a high-flexion knee prosthesis show a better knee function than patients receiving a standard knee prosthesis. Thigh-calf contact force measurements are used to quantify knee function. The investigators' hypothesis is that high-flexion knees show a better knee function.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2008
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 11, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 12, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2013
CompletedNovember 8, 2013
December 1, 2011
4.9 years
May 11, 2009
November 7, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Thigh-calf contact force
pre-op and 1-year post-op
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Passive/active maximal knee flexion angle
pre-op and 1-year post-op
BMI, weight and length
pre-op and 1-year post-op
Thigh and calf circumference
pre-op and 1-year post-op
IKS, WOMAC and VAS (pain/satisfaction) score
pre-op and 1-year post-op
Study Arms (2)
Standard knee prosthesis
ACTIVE COMPARATOR'standard' knee prosthesis (Sigma FB, J\&J, UK).
High flexion knee prosthesis
ACTIVE COMPARATOR'high flexion' knee prosthesis (Sigma RP-F, J\&J, UK).
Interventions
28 subjects will receive the standard Sigma FB knee prosthesis. 28 subjects will receive the high flexion Sigma RP-F knee prosthesis.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients receiving a total knee replacement due to disabling gonarthrosis (cartilage damage):
- Primary due to osteo-arthritis
- Secondary due to rheumatoid arthritis or trauma
You may not qualify if:
- Patients suffering from juvenile rheuma
- Patients suffering from hemophilia
- Patients that are incapable to give informed consent
- Patients who receive a total knee replacement due to an oncological resection
- Patients who have received a total knee replacement on the contralateral leg
- Patients who have disabling gonarthrosis on both legs
- Patients having a BMI \< 25 kg/m\^2
- Patients who have to receive a different prosthesis than used in this study for biomechanical reasons (e.g. revision prosthesis)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Radboud University Medical Centerlead
- Johnson & Johnson Medical BV, The Netherlandscollaborator
- Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital
Nijmegen, 6532 SZ, Netherlands
Related Publications (2)
Zelle J, Barink M, Loeffen R, De Waal Malefijt M, Verdonschot N. Thigh-calf contact force measurements in deep knee flexion. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2007 Aug;22(7):821-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.03.009. Epub 2007 May 18.
PMID: 17512647BACKGROUNDvan der Ven PJP, van de Groes S, Zelle J, Koeter S, Hannink G, Verdonschot N. Kneeling and standing up from a chair as performance-based tests to evaluate knee function in the high-flexion range: a randomized controlled trial comparing a conventional and a high-flexion TKA design. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Aug 1;18(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1657-3.
PMID: 28764691DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nico Verdonschot, Prof.
Radboud University Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 11, 2009
First Posted
May 12, 2009
Study Start
October 1, 2008
Primary Completion
September 1, 2013
Study Completion
October 1, 2013
Last Updated
November 8, 2013
Record last verified: 2011-12