NCT00898443

Brief Summary

This study is to study the success rate of using the epidural catheter that was placed during the labor for the surgical anesthesia to perform a postpartum tubal ligation.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
18

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2008

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2008

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 8, 2009

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 12, 2009

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2010

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2010

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 7, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

August 7, 2012

Status Verified

June 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

May 8, 2009

Results QC Date

April 19, 2012

Last Update Submit

June 26, 2012

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Success Rate of Reactivation of Existing Continuous Labor Epidural Catheter for Postpartum Tubal Ligation

    Rate of reactivation of the epidural catheter for postpartum tubal ligation in the group that was randomized to the epidural anesthetic group. (Need for additional supplemental analgesics and sedatives or the need to convert to general anesthesia.)

    at the time of surgery

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Impact of Anesthesia Type on OR (Operating Room) Efficiency

    minutes until surgery start

Study Arms (2)

Spinal Anesthetic Group

OTHER

This group will receive spinal anesthetic for the surgical procedure and will serve as the control group for this study.

Other: Spinal anesthetic

Epidural Anesthetic Group

EXPERIMENTAL

This is the experimental group for this study.

Other: Epidural anesthetic

Interventions

Use of the existing continuous labor epidural for surgical anesthetic for postpartum tubal ligation

Epidural Anesthetic Group

This group was assigned to receive spinal anesthetic for postpartum tubal ligation.

Spinal Anesthetic Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age19 Years - 45 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 1-3 postpartum women desiring Postpartum Bilateral Tubal Ligation (PPBTL) for infertility
  • Functional epidural catheter placed for labor and delivery analgesia
  • The epidural is still taped within 1cm of the original depth when it was functional for labor analgesia
  • years of age

You may not qualify if:

  • ASA 4 status
  • History of dural puncture ("wet tap") during initial epidural catheter insertion
  • History of marginal or inadequate epidural analgesia for labor
  • Cesarean section for delivery
  • Examination demonstrates that the indwelling catheter has migrated more than 1 cm from the original depth when secured
  • The end of indwelling epidural catheter appears to have not been capped appropriately or the cap was not maintained intact
  • Prolonged sensory or motor block, bladder or anal sphincter dysfunction, nerve damage, inability to ambulate, post-dural puncture headache (PDHD), or seizures, during or after delivery and following cessation of the epidural catheter dosing
  • Pseudocholinesterase deficiency
  • Allergy to Nesacaine® (chloroprocaine) or lidocaine
  • General anesthesia provided for delivery
  • History of substance abuse disorder
  • History of major psychiatric disorder
  • Non-English reading/speaking participants

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, 35249, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Anesthesia, Spinal

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Anesthesia, ConductionAnesthesiaAnesthesia and Analgesia

Results Point of Contact

Title
Marsha Wakefield, M.D.
Organization
UAB

Study Officials

  • Marsha L. Wakefield, MD

    UAB Department of Anesthesiology

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 8, 2009

First Posted

May 12, 2009

Study Start

October 1, 2008

Primary Completion

August 1, 2010

Study Completion

August 1, 2010

Last Updated

August 7, 2012

Results First Posted

August 7, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-06

Locations