Magnetic Resonance Elastography for Assessment of Liver Fibrosis (MK-0000-132)(COMPLETED)
Test-Retest Repeatability Study of Magnetic Resonance Elastography (MRE) for Liver Fibrosis Assessment in Healthy Volunteers and Hepatitis C Virus-Infected Patients
2 other identifiers
interventional
10
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study will assess the repeatability of Magnetic Resonance Elastography (MRE) in both healthy volunteers and Hepatitis C Virus (HCV)-infected patients with fibrosis and lay the groundwork for the validation of MRE as an alternative to liver biopsy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_1
Started Aug 2009
Shorter than P25 for phase_1
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 7, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 11, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 22, 2011
CompletedAugust 25, 2015
August 1, 2015
5 months
May 7, 2009
January 18, 2011
August 11, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Repeated Maximum Liver Elastic Stiffness (Kilopascal [kPa]) Measurements
Reader evaluated 4 sections of the liver at 4 different time points and the end result was a single region of interest (ROI) that could be measured in the registered elastograms at each of the time points. Stiffness measures obtained using the "Individual ROI" (average of the 4 individual ROI's selected by the reader, one for each slice of liver) and "Common ROI" (intersection (or area of common overlap) of the 4 individual ROI's) analysis methods were compared. The mean was the overall mean of the data and the standard deviation was the within participant standard deviation.
14 days
Repeated Mean Liver Elastic Stiffness (kPa) Measurements
Reader evaluated 4 sections of the liver at 4 different time points and the end result was a single ROI that could be measured in the registered elastograms at each of the time points. Stiffness measures obtained using the "Individual ROI" (average of the 4 individual ROI's selected by the reader, one for each slice of liver) and "Common ROI" (intersection (or area of common overlap) of the 4 individual ROI's) analysis methods were compared. The mean was the overall mean of the data and the standard deviation was the within participant standard deviation.
14 days
Percent Difference in Mean Liver Stiffness Between Hepatitis C Virus (HCV)- Positive Participants With Liver Fibrosis and Healthy Participants
Reader evaluated 4 sections of the liver at 4 different time points and the end result was a single region of interest (ROI) that could be measured in the registered elastograms at each of the time points. Stiffness measures obtained using the "Individual ROI" (average of the 4 individual ROI's selected by the reader, one for each slice of liver) and "Common ROI" (intersection (or area of common overlap) of the 4 individual ROI's) analysis methods were compared.
14 days
Percent Difference in Maximum Liver Stiffness Between HCV- Positive Participants With Liver Fibrosis and Healthy Participants
Reader evaluated 4 sections of the liver at 4 different time points and the end result was a single region of interest (ROI) that could be measured in the registered elastograms at each of the time points. Stiffness measures obtained using the "Individual ROI" (average of the 4 individual ROI's selected by the reader, one for each slice of liver) and "Common ROI" (intersection (or area of common overlap) of the 4 individual ROI's) analysis methods were compared.
14 days
Study Arms (1)
MRE
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Part 1: Participants will have a screening visit, followed \~1 month later by two imaging visits over \~14 days. Each imaging visit will consist of two liver MRE scans. Part 2: Participants will have a screening visit, followed \~1 month later by one imaging visit. The imaging visit will consist of two liver MRE scans.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female and at least 18 years of age
- Generally good health
- Willing to fast for 8 hours prior to each study visit
- Positive serology for HCV and detectable HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) in blood within 12 weeks of screening;
- For Part I, known fibrosis stage of at least =F2 (METAVIR) or =F3 (Ishak) from biopsy performed within 3 months of screening; For Part 2, known fibrosis stage of F1-F4 (METAVIR) or F1-F6 (Ishak)
- Never been treated for HCV
- Documented absence of hepatitis B virus, HCV, acute hepatitis A virus, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) within 12 weeks of screening
You may not qualify if:
- History of stroke, seizures, or neurological disorders
- Consumption of excessive amounts of alcohol
- Use of products containing nicotine
- Unable to hold a breath for 20 seconds
- Claustrophobia
- Use of illicit drugs or history of drug or alcohol abuse
- Evidence or history of chronic hepatitis not caused by HCV
- HIV
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Shire NJ, Yin M, Chen J, Railkar RA, Fox-Bosetti S, Johnson SM, Beals CR, Dardzinski BJ, Sanderson SO, Talwalkar JA, Ehman RL. Test-retest repeatability of MR elastography for noninvasive liver fibrosis assessment in hepatitis C. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Oct;34(4):947-55. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22716. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
PMID: 21751289DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Since both primary objectives were met based on the Part 1 analysis, a decision was made to stop the study and not proceed to Part 2. Therefore, data from Part 1 of the study were used for outcome measures 3 and 4 instead of data from Part 2.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Senior Vice President, Global Clinical Development
- Organization
- Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Medical Monitor
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 7, 2009
First Posted
May 11, 2009
Study Start
August 1, 2009
Primary Completion
January 1, 2010
Study Completion
January 1, 2010
Last Updated
August 25, 2015
Results First Posted
September 22, 2011
Record last verified: 2015-08