NCT00896233

Brief Summary

This study will assess the repeatability of Magnetic Resonance Elastography (MRE) in both healthy volunteers and Hepatitis C Virus (HCV)-infected patients with fibrosis and lay the groundwork for the validation of MRE as an alternative to liver biopsy.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
10

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2009

Shorter than P25 for phase_1

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 7, 2009

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 11, 2009

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2009

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2010

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2010

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

September 22, 2011

Completed
Last Updated

August 25, 2015

Status Verified

August 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

May 7, 2009

Results QC Date

January 18, 2011

Last Update Submit

August 11, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

Staging of liver fibrosis prior to clinical trials for treatment of Hepatitis C Virus

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Repeated Maximum Liver Elastic Stiffness (Kilopascal [kPa]) Measurements

    Reader evaluated 4 sections of the liver at 4 different time points and the end result was a single region of interest (ROI) that could be measured in the registered elastograms at each of the time points. Stiffness measures obtained using the "Individual ROI" (average of the 4 individual ROI's selected by the reader, one for each slice of liver) and "Common ROI" (intersection (or area of common overlap) of the 4 individual ROI's) analysis methods were compared. The mean was the overall mean of the data and the standard deviation was the within participant standard deviation.

    14 days

  • Repeated Mean Liver Elastic Stiffness (kPa) Measurements

    Reader evaluated 4 sections of the liver at 4 different time points and the end result was a single ROI that could be measured in the registered elastograms at each of the time points. Stiffness measures obtained using the "Individual ROI" (average of the 4 individual ROI's selected by the reader, one for each slice of liver) and "Common ROI" (intersection (or area of common overlap) of the 4 individual ROI's) analysis methods were compared. The mean was the overall mean of the data and the standard deviation was the within participant standard deviation.

    14 days

  • Percent Difference in Mean Liver Stiffness Between Hepatitis C Virus (HCV)- Positive Participants With Liver Fibrosis and Healthy Participants

    Reader evaluated 4 sections of the liver at 4 different time points and the end result was a single region of interest (ROI) that could be measured in the registered elastograms at each of the time points. Stiffness measures obtained using the "Individual ROI" (average of the 4 individual ROI's selected by the reader, one for each slice of liver) and "Common ROI" (intersection (or area of common overlap) of the 4 individual ROI's) analysis methods were compared.

    14 days

  • Percent Difference in Maximum Liver Stiffness Between HCV- Positive Participants With Liver Fibrosis and Healthy Participants

    Reader evaluated 4 sections of the liver at 4 different time points and the end result was a single region of interest (ROI) that could be measured in the registered elastograms at each of the time points. Stiffness measures obtained using the "Individual ROI" (average of the 4 individual ROI's selected by the reader, one for each slice of liver) and "Common ROI" (intersection (or area of common overlap) of the 4 individual ROI's) analysis methods were compared.

    14 days

Study Arms (1)

MRE

EXPERIMENTAL
Procedure: MRE

Interventions

MREPROCEDURE

Part 1: Participants will have a screening visit, followed \~1 month later by two imaging visits over \~14 days. Each imaging visit will consist of two liver MRE scans. Part 2: Participants will have a screening visit, followed \~1 month later by one imaging visit. The imaging visit will consist of two liver MRE scans.

MRE

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male or female and at least 18 years of age
  • Generally good health
  • Willing to fast for 8 hours prior to each study visit
  • Positive serology for HCV and detectable HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) in blood within 12 weeks of screening;
  • For Part I, known fibrosis stage of at least =F2 (METAVIR) or =F3 (Ishak) from biopsy performed within 3 months of screening; For Part 2, known fibrosis stage of F1-F4 (METAVIR) or F1-F6 (Ishak)
  • Never been treated for HCV
  • Documented absence of hepatitis B virus, HCV, acute hepatitis A virus, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) within 12 weeks of screening

You may not qualify if:

  • History of stroke, seizures, or neurological disorders
  • Consumption of excessive amounts of alcohol
  • Use of products containing nicotine
  • Unable to hold a breath for 20 seconds
  • Claustrophobia
  • Use of illicit drugs or history of drug or alcohol abuse
  • Evidence or history of chronic hepatitis not caused by HCV
  • HIV

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (1)

  • Shire NJ, Yin M, Chen J, Railkar RA, Fox-Bosetti S, Johnson SM, Beals CR, Dardzinski BJ, Sanderson SO, Talwalkar JA, Ehman RL. Test-retest repeatability of MR elastography for noninvasive liver fibrosis assessment in hepatitis C. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Oct;34(4):947-55. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22716. Epub 2011 Jul 12.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Liver CirrhosisHepatitis C

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Liver DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesFibrosisPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsBlood-Borne InfectionsCommunicable DiseasesInfectionsHepatitis, Viral, HumanVirus DiseasesFlaviviridae InfectionsRNA Virus InfectionsHepatitis

Limitations and Caveats

Since both primary objectives were met based on the Part 1 analysis, a decision was made to stop the study and not proceed to Part 2. Therefore, data from Part 1 of the study were used for outcome measures 3 and 4 instead of data from Part 2.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Senior Vice President, Global Clinical Development
Organization
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp

Study Officials

  • Medical Monitor

    Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 7, 2009

First Posted

May 11, 2009

Study Start

August 1, 2009

Primary Completion

January 1, 2010

Study Completion

January 1, 2010

Last Updated

August 25, 2015

Results First Posted

September 22, 2011

Record last verified: 2015-08