Performance Evaluation of the AMS CONTINUUM™ Device
2 other identifiers
interventional
33
1 country
6
Brief Summary
- 1.To assess the safety of using the CONTINUUM™ device by monitoring the side effects and complications associated with the Device following a radical prostatectomy.
- 2.To verify CONTINUUM™ device performance using updated CONTINUUM™ device design modifications, physician procedure guide and training methodology.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable prostate-cancer
Started May 2009
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable prostate-cancer
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 5, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 7, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 13, 2017
CompletedFebruary 22, 2018
January 1, 2017
1.6 years
May 5, 2009
January 22, 2017
January 24, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (9)
Safety - Infection That Requires IV Antibiotics or Re-hospitalization
Safety of the device was evaluated by incidences of specific serious Device-related adverse complications that occurred during placement, wearing of the CONTINUUM device and during 6-month follow-up.
At Device placement, Device removal, 4 weeks post-Device removal, 6 months post-Device removal
Successful Device Placement
Defined as the establishment of a water-tight anastomosis immediately post-Device placement.
At Device placement
Functionally Adequate Vesico-urethral Anastomosis Within 21 Days Post-Device Placement in Subjects With Successful Device Placement
Evaluated by the proportion of Subjects who have had a successful Device placement and developed a functionally adequate anastomosis within 21 days post procedure (i.e. minimal or no extravasation noted during post-placement)
7-21 days post-Device placement
Safety - Perforation of the Bowel or Bladder
Safety of the device was evaluated by incidences of specific serious Device-related adverse complications that occurred during placement, wearing of the CONTINUUM device and during 6-month follow-up.
At Device placement, Device removal, 4 weeks post-Device removal, 6 months post-Device removal
Safety - Creation of a False Passage
Safety of the device was evaluated by incidences of specific serious Device-related adverse complications that occurred during placement, wearing of the CONTINUUM device and during 6-month follow-up.
At Device placement, Device removal, 4 weeks post-Device removal, 6 months post-Device removal
Safety - Urinary Retention Requiring Catheterization Post-Device Removal
Safety of the device was evaluated by incidences of specific serious Device-related adverse complications that occurred during placement, wearing of the CONTINUUM device and during 6-month follow-up.
At Device placement, Device removal, 4 weeks post-Device removal, 6 months post-Device removal
Safety - Mechanical Failure, Extrusion, Erosion, or Migration of the Device Requiring Surgical or Medical Intervention
Safety of the device was evaluated by incidences of specific serious Device-related adverse complications that occurred during placement, wearing of the CONTINUUM device and during 6-month follow-up.
At Device placement, Device removal, 4 weeks post-Device removal, 6 months post-Device removal
Safety - Separation/Disruption of the Anastomosis Requiring Corrective Intervention
Safety of the device was evaluated by incidences of specific serious Device-related adverse complications that occurred during placement, wearing of the CONTINUUM device and during 6-month follow-up.
At Device placement, Device removal, 4 weeks post-Device removal, 6 months post-Device removal
Safety - Bladder Neck Contracture
Safety of the device was evaluated by incidences of specific serious Device-related adverse complications that occurred during placement, wearing of the CONTINUUM device and during 6-month follow-up.
At Device placement, Device removal, 4 weeks post-Device removal, 6 months post-Device removal
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Intraoperative/Postoperative Parameters - Estimated Blood Loss
At Device placement
Extravasation During Post-placement Cystogram at Either the First or Second Device Removal Attempts
7-10 and 13 - 15 days post-Device placement
Intraoperative/Postoperative Parameters - Total Device Placement Time
At Device placement
Intraoperative/Postoperative Parameters - Total Radical Prostatectomy Operative Time
At Device placement
Study Arms (1)
Continuum
EXPERIMENTALVerify the consistency of performance of the AMS CONTINUUM device in facilitating a sustainable anastomosis following a radical prostatectomy using updated Device design elements and Physician training materials on Device implant technique.
Interventions
Performance of CONTINUUM™ in facilitating the vesico-urethral anastomosis following radical prostatectomy.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All males ≥ 40 years old who are indicated for a radical prostatectomy will be eligible to participate in the study.
- The Subject is willing and able to return for study follow-up visits according to the protocol.
- The Subject can be off diuretics and blood thinners for at least one week prior to surgery.
You may not qualify if:
- If contraindicated for surgery
- Inability to understand the study or a history of non-compliance with medical advice
- Unwilling or unable to sign an Informed Consent Form (ICF)
- Participation in another clinical trial
- Previously implanted urological device
- A history of Recurrent urinary tract infections (UTI)
- A history of stricture disease
- Prior invasive prostate treatments (e.g., TURP, TUIP, laser therapy, radiotherapy, cryotherapy)
- Neurological disease with a history of bladder dysfunction (e.g., Parkinson's disease)
- Uncontrolled insulin-dependent diabetes
- Chemotherapy within the past 6 months
- Non-topical steroid use within the past 6 months
- History of connective tissue or autoimmune conditions
- Compromised immune system
- Allergy to nitinol, nickel, titanium or silicone
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (6)
Arkansas Urology
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72211, United States
Lahey Clinic Medical Center
Burlington, Massachusetts, 01805, United States
Center for Urology
Rochester, New York, 14619, United States
Urologic Consultants of Southeastern Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19004, United States
Urology Clinics of North Texas
Dallas, Texas, 75231, United States
Urology San Antonio Research PA
San Antonio, Texas, 78205, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Laura Olson, Clinical Project Manager
- Organization
- American Medical Systems
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Naveen Kella, MD
Urology San Antonio Research PA
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John Libertino, MD
Lahey Clinic Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 5, 2009
First Posted
May 7, 2009
Study Start
May 1, 2009
Primary Completion
December 1, 2010
Study Completion
December 1, 2010
Last Updated
February 22, 2018
Results First Posted
March 13, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share