Laparoscopic Versus Open Left Colonic Resection
Laparoscopic vs. Open Left Colonic Resection: a Randomized Monocentric Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
268
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The main goal of this study is to clarify if laparoscopy (LPS) could become the standard approach in patients undergoing left colonic resection. 268 patient candidates to left colonic resection were randomly assigned to LPS (n=134) or open (n=134) approach. Postoperative care protocol was the same in both groups. Trained members of the surgical staff who were not involved in the study registered 30-day postoperative morbidity. Cost-benefit analysis was based on hospital costs. Long-term morbidity, quality of life, and 5-year survival have also been evaluated.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Feb 2000
Longer than P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2000
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2004
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 6, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 7, 2009
CompletedMay 7, 2009
May 1, 2009
4.8 years
May 6, 2009
May 6, 2009
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
short-term morbidity rate
30 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
long-term outcome
5 years
Study Arms (2)
LPS
EXPERIMENTALlaparoscopic left colonic resection
Open
ACTIVE COMPARATORopen left colonic resection
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age \> 18 years
- suitability to elective surgery
You may not qualify if:
- cancer infiltrating adjacent organs assessed by computed tomography
- cardiovascular dysfunction (New York Heart Association class \> 3)
- respiratory dysfunction (arterial pO2 \< 70 mmHg)
- hepatic dysfunction (Child-Pugh class C)
- ongoing infection
- plasma neutrophil level \< 2.0x109/L
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
San Raffaele Hospital, Surgical Department
Milan, 20132, Italy
Related Publications (1)
Braga M, Frasson M, Zuliani W, Vignali A, Pecorelli N, Di Carlo V. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open left colonic resection. Br J Surg. 2010 Aug;97(8):1180-6. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7094.
PMID: 20602506DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Marco Braga, MD
San Raffaele Vita-Salute University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 6, 2009
First Posted
May 7, 2009
Study Start
February 1, 2000
Primary Completion
December 1, 2004
Study Completion
December 1, 2008
Last Updated
May 7, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-05