Procedure Transurethral Needle Ablation (TUNA) and Hospitalization of Short Duration
EPURE
Evaluation of Procedure Tuna Within the Framework of a Hospitalization of Short Duration
1 other identifier
interventional
53
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The TUNA is a known and already old technique. There exists, in the literature, a certain number of studies showing the long-term effectiveness (5 years), evaluated on the IPS and the flow mictional.This effectiveness is slightly lower than that of the endoscopic resection of prostate. This technique does not present the disadvantages of the surgery prostate sufferer on ejaculation. Moreover, it can be carried out in short hospitalization or ambulatory as it is the case in particular in the States Unis. The aim of the study which will be led by the AP-HP will be thus to test the feasibility of the TUNA during a hospitalization of less 24 hours.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2006
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 29, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 30, 2009
CompletedOctober 1, 2009
April 1, 2009
2.8 years
April 29, 2009
September 30, 2009
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Left the hospital
the evening of the intervention
Not hospitalized for a complication related to the intervention
in the month following the intervention
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Evaluation of the satisfaction of the intervention for the patient
at 1 month
Evaluation for the micturition of the following parameters
at 1 month
Evaluation of the appeared minor complications
at 1 month
Study Arms (1)
Procedure TUNA
OTHERInterventions
Transurethral needle ablation of benign prostatic hyperplasia by radio frequencies
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Man whose age is superior or egal to 45 and inferior or egal to 85 years
- Patient presenting an anaesthetic risk of ASA 1 at 3
- Patient accepting the protocol, in particular the return to residence with a sounder
- Patient presenting a TUBA related to a HBP and lasting since more than 3 months
- with a gene score higher superior or egal to 3
- with a score IPS superior to 8
- Patient presenting a prostate whose estimated weight is inferior or egal to 80g, without median lobe prevailing and whose transverse width lies between 34 and 80 mm.
- Patient having a residue post mictional lower than 200cc.
- Patient presenting a normal renal function
- Patient having a result PSA £ 4 ng/ml, or negative biopsies if PSA \> 4 and \< 10 ng/ml
- Patient having given his free and in writing lit assent
- Patient affiliated to the Social security or an assimilated mode
- Patient having stopped his treatment by 5 alpha reductase since at least a month (1)
You may not qualify if:
- Patient presenting a urinary infection
- Patient presenting an acute retention of urine
- Patient presenting a neurological bladder and/or of an anomaly of the sphincter
- Patient currently under anticoagulant treatment.
- Patient currently under anti-inflammatory treatment.
- Patient presenting an affection or a confirmed or suspected malignant tumour of the prostates or vegie.
- Patient presenting an antecedent of surgery prostatic
- Patient presenting of the biopsies prostate sufferers carried out less than 4 months before procedure TUNA
- Patient introducing of the antecedents of vesical lithiasis, haematuria important, contracting of the urethra, stenosis of the vesical collar, pathologies of the bladder or sweetened diabetes affecting vesical operation,
- Patient presenting a prosthesis in the zone being able to be affected by the procedure
- Patient presenting a desire of fertility
- Patient presenting an anorectal pathology
- Patient presenting an allergy to the anaesthesia locale
- Patient whose follow-up seems incompatible with the needs for the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hôpital TENON - Service d'Urologie
Paris, 75020, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bertrand LUKACS, MD,PhD
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 29, 2009
First Posted
April 30, 2009
Study Start
March 1, 2006
Primary Completion
December 1, 2008
Study Completion
March 1, 2009
Last Updated
October 1, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-04