Treatment Effects of Escitalopram (Lexapro®) on Generalized Anxiety Disorder in Patients With HIV and AIDS
2 other identifiers
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether escitalopram is safe, well tolerated, and effective in the treatment of HIV-infected patients with generalized anxiety disorder.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started May 2009
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 23, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 24, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 10, 2014
CompletedOctober 31, 2014
March 1, 2014
4 months
April 23, 2009
November 19, 2012
October 23, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change From Randomization to End of Treatment in Scores on the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A)
The HAM-A is administered by an interviewer who asks a series of questions related to symptoms of anxiety. The interviewer then rates the individual on a five-point scale for each of the 14 items. Seven of the items specifically address psychic anxiety and the remaining seven items address somatic anxiety. The total anxiety score ranges from 0 to 56, lower scores are better. Change from randomization to end of treatment in scores on the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A)is measured.
baseline and 7 weeks
Changes From Randomization to End of Treatment in Scores on the Beck Depression Inventory
Scoring The BDI consist of twenty-one questions about how the subject has been feeling in the last week. Each question has a set of at least four possible answer choices, ranging in intensity as follows: (0) I do not feel sad. 1. I feel sad. 2. I am sad all the time and I can't snap out of it. 3. I am so sad or unhappy that I can't stand it. A value of 0 to 3 is assigned for each answer and the total score is compared to a key to determine the depression's severity. The standard cut-offs are as follows:\[6\] 0-9: indicates minimal depression 10-18: indicates mild depression 19-29: indicates moderate depression 30-63: indicates severe depression. Higher total scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.
baseline and 7 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change From Randomization to End of Treatment in Scores for the Clinical Global Impression(CGI-S and CGI-I)
baseline and 7 weeks
Change From Randomization to End of Treatment for Trail Making Tet (TMT)
baseline to 7 weeks
Changes From Randomization to End of Treatment in Scores on the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)
baseline and 7 weeks
Changes From Randomization to End of Treatment in Scores on the Sheehan Disability Scores (SDS)
baseline and 7 weeks
Study Arms (1)
Escitalopram
EXPERIMENTALTreatment effects of Escitalopram in Generalized Anxiety Disorder in patients with HIV/AIDS.Open label, rater-blinded, prospective, 6-week trial of escitalopram.Subjects received escitalopram 10-20mg. Escitalopram was started at 10mg per day and augmented weekly in 10mg per day increments, the maximum dose being 20mg per day.
Interventions
10-20 mg/day oral of Escitalopram for 6-weeks. Escitalopram flexible dose (10-20 mg/day). A forced escalation schedule of escitalopram was used to titrate it to the maximum tolerated dose. Drug was discontinued at the end of the study.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age 18 to 65 years,
- DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) criteria for Generalized Anxiety Disorder
- confirmed stable HIV disease and attending a HIV treatment program
- stable dose of highly active anti-retroviral therapy for a minimum of 4 weeks
- ability to give informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- bipolar disorders, any psychotic disorder
- current major depression
- substance dependence (except nicotine dependence) in the previous 3 months
- currently suicidal or high suicide risk, serious or unstable medical disorders (e.g. uncontrolled hypertension or diabetes)
- any hospitalization for HIV-related illness in the previous 3 months
- any active CNS (central nervous system) CNS opportunistic infection or CNS malignancies related to HIV
- current active treatment for opportunistic infections related to HIV
- any psychotropic drug treatment in the previous 2 weeks before screening
- history of hypersensitivity to escitalopram and/or citalopram
- admission BDI 23
- seizure disorder, traumatic brain injury
- pregnant, nursing mother or planning to get pregnant.
- Concomitant mediations: At least 2-week washout of antidepressant (4 weeks for fluoxetine) or antipsychotic or anti-anxiety medications.
- In the opinion of the investigator the clinical condition precludes participation in the trial.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Duke Universitylead
- Forest Laboratoriescollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
Related Publications (2)
Pence BW, Miller WC, Whetten K, Eron JJ, Gaynes BN. Prevalence of DSM-IV-defined mood, anxiety, and substance use disorders in an HIV clinic in the Southeastern United States. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006 Jul;42(3):298-306. doi: 10.1097/01.qai.0000219773.82055.aa.
PMID: 16639343BACKGROUNDTucker JS, Kanouse DE, Miu A, Koegel P, Sullivan G. HIV risk behaviors and their correlates among HIV-positive adults with serious mental illness. AIDS Behav. 2003 Mar;7(1):29-40. doi: 10.1023/a:1022557222690.
PMID: 14534388BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Ashwin A Patkar Associate Professor
- Organization
- Duke University Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ashwin A Patkar, MD
Duke University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 23, 2009
First Posted
April 24, 2009
Study Start
May 1, 2009
Primary Completion
September 1, 2009
Study Completion
September 1, 2010
Last Updated
October 31, 2014
Results First Posted
March 10, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-03