F18PET/CT Versus TC-MDP Scanning to Detect Bone Mets
18F-Fluoride PET/CT Versus 99mTc-MDP Scanning for Detecting Bone Metastases: A Randomized, Multi-Center Trial to Compare Two Bone Imaging Techniques
1 other identifier
interventional
550
4 countries
18
Brief Summary
The primary objective is to compare the diagnostic performance of 18F- Fluoride PET/CT scanning to that of conventional bone scanning for detecting cancer that has spread to the bone (bone metastasis). The intent of the study is to determine whether 18F-Fluoride PET/CT will lead to improved treatment and patient outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Jan 2009
Typical duration for phase_3
18 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 15, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 16, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2013
CompletedNovember 29, 2012
November 1, 2012
3.9 years
April 15, 2009
November 28, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Analysis of the diagnostic performance of [18F]NaF fluoride PET/CT scanning
The primary endpoint will be an analysis of the diagnostic performance of \[18F\]NaF fluoride PET/CT scanning to that of conventional bone scanning for detecting cancer that has spread to the bone (bone metastasis). The hypothesis is that PET/CT is superior to conventional bone scanning for detecting bone metastases. The primary metrics used for comparison will be the relative areas under the ROC curves generated by blinded core lab interpretations of the scans.
6 Months
Study Arms (2)
TC-MDP Bone Scan
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients without known bone metastases who are newly diagnosed with ≥ stage 3 breast cancer, ≥ stage 3 lung cancer, or ≥ stage 2 prostate cancer (and/or PSA \>10 micrograms/L), including patient with recurrent breast, lung or prostate cancer; Patient is scheduled to undergo a conventional bone scan
F18-Fluoride PET/CT
EXPERIMENTALPatients without known bone metastases who are newly diagnosed with ≥ stage 3 breast cancer, ≥ stage 3 lung cancer, or ≥ stage 2 prostate cancer (and/or PSA \>10 micrograms/L), including patient with recurrent breast, lung or prostate cancer; Patient is scheduled to undergo a conventional bone scan
Interventions
Each patient will be randomized into one of two groups with one group receiving Sodium Fluoride F18 Injection and the other receiving the control agent, 99mTc-MDPSodium Fluoride F18 Injection Dosing and Administration. The dose will be tailored for the specific patient for whom the dose was ordered. The dose of Sodium Fluoride F18 Injection administered will range from 5-10 mCi/patient.Each patient randomized to the control group will be administered 99mTc-MDP as a single intravenous bolus dose. The administered radioactivity will be determined based on the sites routine clinical practice for conventional bone imaging.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient is ≥ 18 years old at the time of the drug administration (Patient may be male or female of any race / ethnicity.)
- Patient or patient's legally acceptable representative cognitively provides written informed consent
- Patients without known bone metastases who are newly diagnosed with ≥ stage 3 breast cancer, ≥ stage 3 lung cancer, or ≥ stage 2 prostate cancer (and/or PSA \>10 micrograms/L), including patient with recurrent breast, lung or prostate cancer
- Patient is scheduled to undergo a conventional bone scan
- Patient is capable of complying with study procedures
- Patient is able to remain still for duration of imaging procedure (about one hour)
- Patient may have had a prior PET or PET/CT scan for staging/restaging.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient is \< 18 years old at the time of the drug administration
- Patient is pregnant or nursing;
- testing on site at the institution (urine or serum ßHCG) within 24 hours prior to the start of investigational product administration
- obtaining surgical history (e.g., tubal ligation or hysterectomy)
- confirming the subject is post menopausal, with a minimum 1 year without menses
- Patient has any other condition or personal circumstance that, in the judgment of the investigator, might interfere with the collection of complete good quality data
- Patient has known bone metastases
- Patient has previously received \[18F\]NaF in the last thirty days
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (19)
Scottsdale Medical Imaging
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85252, United States
Silicon Valley Imaging
Freemont, California, 94538, United States
Cedar-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048, United States
VA West Los Angles Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90073, United States
UCLA
Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States
Stanford University Medical Center
Stanford, California, 94305, United States
SouthCoast Imaging Center
Savannah, Georgia, 31406, United States
University of Michigan Health System
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
Saint Luke's Hospital
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111, United States
John Cochran Veterans Administration
St Louis, Missouri, 63106, United States
Saint Louis University
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756, United States
New York Presbyterian Weill Cornell
New York, New York, 10065, United States
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
University of Utah School of Medicine
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112, United States
Peter MacCallum
Melbourne, Victoria, 8006, Australia
PET-CT Linz - St. Vicent's Hospital
Linz, Linz, Austria
Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra
Coimbra, Portugal, Portugal
University Hospital Zurich
Zurich, Switzerland, 8091, Switzerland
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Johannes Czernin, MD
World Molecular Imaging Society
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 15, 2009
First Posted
April 16, 2009
Study Start
January 1, 2009
Primary Completion
December 1, 2012
Study Completion
June 1, 2013
Last Updated
November 29, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-11