Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) for Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD)
Efficacy of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy -v- Anxiety Management for Body Dysmorphic Disorder: a Randomised Controlled Trial
2 other identifiers
interventional
46
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the research is to determine if Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) specific for BDD is more effective than a credible non-specific form of CBT for treating BDD and its delusional variant in adults aged 17 or over. This will be done in a single centre randomised controlled trial that compares specific CBT for BDD versus non-specific CBT over 12 weeks. The hypotheses to be tested are that: (1) specific CBT for BDD will be more effective than non-specific CBT at 12 weeks (2) Treatment effects from Specific CBT will be maintained at 1 month follow up. The main study end-point is at 12 weeks and the secondary end-point is at 1 month follow up. A secondary aim is to explore whether delusionality (insight) as measured by the Brown Assessment of Beliefs and co-morbid depressed mood predicts response to treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2009
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 27, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 30, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 6, 2015
CompletedOctober 6, 2015
September 1, 2015
2.1 years
March 27, 2009
April 15, 2015
September 4, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Yale Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Modified for BDD) (BDD -YBOCS) (Phillips et al., 1997)
This is a clinician-rated scale administered by a trained blinded assessor. The range is 0-48. Cronbach's α for the scale is 0.80. Response to treatment is defined as a 30% or greater decrease in the total BDD-YBOCS score, which best corresponded to 'much improved' on the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale. In the original validation study, this cutoff score produced 1 false negative (96% sensitivity), that is, 1 participant who was rated as much or very much improved on the CGI was not classified as a responder on the BDD-YBOCS using the 30% threshold.
12 weeks, 1 month post treatment
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Brown Assessment of Beliefs to Measure the Strength of Conviction in Beliefs About Being Ugly (Eisen et al., 1998)
12 weeks, 1 month post treatment
Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (Montgomery and Asberg, 1979).
12 weeks, 1 month post treatment
Appearance Anxiety Inventory (AAI)
12 weeks, 1 month post treatment
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9
12 weeks, 1 month post treatment
Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD)-7
12 weeks,1 month post treatment
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
CBT specific for BDD
EXPERIMENTALThis consisted of 12 wks of 1 hr sessions (1 per week).The consisted of engagement in a developmental understanding of the problem and setting up an alternative view of the problem. Imagery rescripting followed for past aversive memories that were associated with the onset (e.g. bullying). The behaviours were aimed at either (1) threat detection and monitoring or (2) preventing feared consequences by avoidance or (3) attempts to undo the appearance concerns. The therapist aimed to help individuals identify their beliefs about processes, conduct behavioural experiments that tested out their expectations and to gradually drop the safety-seeking behaviours and test out their fears.
Non Specific CBT
ACTIVE COMPARATORAnxiety Management treatment was provided once a week for 12 weeks, with each session lasting 1 hr. AM was planned to entail a therapeutic alliance, support and homework similar to the CBT group. The rationale provided was that when triggered, the person would experience a threat and negative thoughts about their appearance. This, in turn, would lead to physical symptoms of anxiety and magnify the perceived threat. The treatment consisted of (1) practising progressive muscle relaxation and breathing daily, (2) identifying triggers and physical symptoms associated with appearance-related anxiety and (3) utilising brief muscle relaxation and breathing techniques in trigger situations.
Interventions
This consisted of 12 wks of 1 hr sessions (1 per week).The consisted of engagement in a developmental understanding of the problem and setting up an alternative view of the problem. Imagery rescripting followed for past aversive memories that were associated with the onset (e.g. bullying). The behaviours were aimed at either (1) threat detection and monitoring or (2) preventing feared consequences by avoidance or (3) attempts to undo the appearance concerns. The therapist aimed to help individuals identify their beliefs about processes, conduct behavioural experiments that tested out their expectations and to gradually drop the safety-seeking behaviours and test out their fears.
Anxiety Management treatment was provided once a week for 12 weeks, with each session lasting 1 hr. AM was planned to entail a therapeutic alliance, support and homework similar to the CBT group. The rationale provided was that when triggered, the person would experience a threat and negative thoughts about their appearance. This, in turn, would lead to physical symptoms of anxiety and magnify the perceived threat. The treatment consisted of (1) practising progressive muscle relaxation and breathing daily, (2) identifying triggers and physical symptoms associated with appearance-related anxiety and (3) utilising brief muscle relaxation and breathing techniques in trigger situations.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- BDD is the main psychological problem. We will use DSMIV criteria as BDD does not exist as a separate diagnosis in ICD10. They may have an additional diagnosis of Delusional Disorder when it refers to beliefs about being ugly or defective.
- They must have a total of 24 or more on the twelve-item YBOCS modified for BDD (Phillips et al., 1997).
- They may be of either gender but must be 17 years or above.
- They are willing to travel to the treatment centre for weekly sessions.
- They are wiling to complete regular questionnaires and be audiotaped for supervision and for listening to enhance their learning.
- They may be taking psychotropic medication so long as it is stabilised and there are no plans to increase the dose.
You may not qualify if:
- They have a current or past diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar affective disorder.
- They have current suicidal intent or severe self-neglect that requires hospitalisation.
- They have a current alcohol or substance dependence or anorexia nervosa or borderline personality disorder that requires treatment in its own right.
- They are currently receiving any other form of psychotherapy,
- They have received CBT for BDD in the past 6 months, which is judged as competently delivered and did not respond.
- They cannot speak sufficient English for CBT. (Assistance will be provided for those who speak English but are unable to read questionnaires).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
South London and Maudsley NHS Trust
London, SE5 8AZ, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Veale D, Anson M, Miles S, Pieta M, Costa A, Ellison N. Efficacy of cognitive behaviour therapy versus anxiety management for body dysmorphic disorder: a randomised controlled trial. Psychother Psychosom. 2014;83(6):341-53. doi: 10.1159/000360740. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
PMID: 25323062RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Small sample size: may have led to difficulty in identifying predictors of outcome. Investigator bias: but testing blinding would be biased as it may be influenced by her rating of the outcome. Treatment too brief to achieve sig. changes in BDD.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. David Veale
- Organization
- Institute of Psychiatry
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Consultant Psychiatrist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 27, 2009
First Posted
March 30, 2009
Study Start
April 1, 2009
Primary Completion
May 1, 2011
Study Completion
September 1, 2012
Last Updated
October 6, 2015
Results First Posted
October 6, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-09