Head Positions to Open the Upper Airway
1 other identifier
interventional
60
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Ventilation during basic life support improves survival in cardiac arrest patients significantly. Unfortunately, this is in contrast to the willingness of potential rescuers to perform mouth-to-mouth ventilation. For example, although healthcare professionals would perform mouth-to-mouth ventilation on a 4-year old drowned child in \>90% of cases, this likelihood would decrease to \~10% in the case of a young male unconscious patient in a San Francisco public bus. Possibly, lay rescuers would perform assisted ventilation more often if a simple ventilation device were available. However, both the willingness to perform assisted ventilation plus the ability to open and to maintain the airway patent are necessary to ensure efficient ventilation in an unconscious patient with an unprotected upper airway. Since retention of skills after basic life support classes are notoriously low, a resuscitation tool should incorporate self-explanatory features to improve applicability, and to provide built-in safety. Thus, an option could be to ensure an open airway by the use of a built-in indicator within a ventilating device to confirm correct head extension. One possible approach may be to determine head position angles that make an open airway likely, and integrate these angles into a scale on a ventilating device; however, safe head extension needs to be determined first to prevent harm. The purpose of this study is to determine head position angles and ventilation parameters reflecting neutral position, maximal extension and a position deemed optimal by an anaesthesiologist in patients undergoing anaesthesia induction for elective surgery in a first step to design a ventilating device to optimise ventilation of an unprotected upper airway. The investigators will ventilate 30 patients with a pillow under the head simulating ventilation in the operating theater, and 30 patients without a pillow under the head simulating ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Dentures will not be removed during assessment. After anaesthesia induction the head will be consecutively flexed in the three positions and measurements performed. Afterwards, general anaesthesia and surgery will ensue. The health risk for this extra minutes of mask ventilation is minimal. The null hypothesis is that there will be no differences in head position angles and ventilation parameters.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2009
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 25, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 26, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2009
CompletedMarch 23, 2017
March 1, 2017
3 months
March 25, 2009
March 21, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Head position angles
Within 5 minutes after anaesthesia induction
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Tidal volume
Within 5 minutes after anaesthesia induction
Study Arms (3)
Neutralposition
ACTIVE COMPARATORHead placed in neutral position
Extension
ACTIVE COMPARATORHead placed in extension
Anaesthesiologist's position
ACTIVE COMPARATORHead placed in position deemed optimal by an anaesthesiologist
Interventions
After anaesthesia induction the head is placed in neutral position
after anaesthesia induction the head is placed in a position deemed optimal by the anaesthesiologist
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA I and II
You may not qualify if:
- Cervical spine pathologies
- Peripheral nerve deficiencies
- Body mass index \>40kg/m2
- Obvious primary or secondary craniofacial abnormalities
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Mitterlechner T, Paal P, Kuehnelt-Leddhin L, Strasak AM, Putz G, Gravenstein N, von Goedecke A, Wenzel V. Head position angles to open the upper airway differ less with the head positioned on a support. Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;31(1):80-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2012.06.007. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
PMID: 22944550DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Peter Paal, MD, DESA
Medical University Innsbruck
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PD MD MBA EDAIC EDIC
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 25, 2009
First Posted
March 26, 2009
Study Start
April 1, 2009
Primary Completion
July 1, 2009
Study Completion
August 1, 2009
Last Updated
March 23, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-03