Dose Finding Study of Gadavist in Central Nervous System (CNS) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Multi-center, Double-blind, Randomized, Controlled, Parallel Group, Dose Comparison Study With Corresponding Blinded Image Evaluation Following a Single Intravenous Injection of Three Different Doses of Gadobutrol 1.0 Molar (Gadavist) in Patients With Known or Suspected Focal Blood Brain Barrier Disturbances and/or Abnormal Vascularity of the Central Nervous System
2 other identifiers
interventional
237
4 countries
27
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to look at the safety (what are the side effects) and efficacy (how well does it work) of Gadavist when used for taking images of the brain and spine. The results of the MRI with Gadavist Injection will be compared to the results of MR images taken without contrast and with the results of the MR images taken with OptiMARK.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Aug 2005
27 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 26, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 17, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 30, 2012
CompletedJanuary 13, 2014
December 1, 2013
1.6 years
November 26, 2008
September 14, 2011
December 11, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Categorical Visualization Score (CVS)
The primary visualization variables (number \[no.\] of lesions detected, border delineation, contrast enhancement, internal morphology) were condensed to a composite score (CVS). Each variable was considered a category; the CVS was calculated as: CVS=(No. of categories with increase over precontrast)-(No. of categories with decrease over precontrast). The possible outcomes of the CVS for a participant and each reader were in the range of - 3 to +4. The CVS was averaged across the 3 blinded readers, producing 1 mean CVS per participant. The higher the CVS, the more effective the treatment.
up to 2 hours after the injection of study medication
Difference in Number of Lesions Detected in Pre-contrast and Combined Pre-/Post-contrast MRI.
Three blinded readers evaluated the unenhanced MRI sets and the combined unenhanced/gadobutrol-enhanced MRI sets to evaluate the number of lesions, which was then averaged to produce an average reader value.
up to 2 hours after the injection of study medication
Assessment of Lesion Contrast Enhancement
The blinded readers assessed the degree of contrast enhancement for each lesion on a 4-point scale where 1 = no enhancement and 4 = excellent enhancement, which was then averaged to produce an average reader score.
up to 2 hours after the injection of study medication
Assessment of Border Delineation
The blinded readers assessed the delineation for each lesion on a 4-point scale where 1 = none and 4 = excellent, which was then averaged to produce an average reader score.
up to 2 hours after the injection of study medication
Assessment of Internal Morphology
The blinded readers assessed the degree of information available about internal morphology and structure for each lesion on a 3-point scale where 1 = poor and 3 = good, which was then averaged to produce an average reader score.
up to 2 hours after the injection of study medication
Contrast to Noise Ratio (CNR) Between White and Gray Matter With Gadobutrol Perfusion MRI
CNR between white and gray matter in the perfusion imaging was defined as the signal intensity (SI) difference between white and gray matter divided by the standard deviation of the SI of white matter. An independent radiologist evaluated the gadobutrol-enhanced perfusion MRI for signal intensity.
up to 2 hours after the injection of study medication
Secondary Outcomes (40)
Accuracy Comparison of Gadobutrol Doses - Detection of Matched Lesions: Blinded Reader 1
up to 2 hours after the injection of study medication
Accuracy Comparison of Gadobutrol Doses - Detection of Matched Lesions: Blinded Reader 2
up to 2 hours after the injection of study medication
Accuracy Comparison of Gadobutrol Doses - Detection of Matched Lesions: Blinded Reader 3
up to 2 hours after the injection of study medication
Accuracy Comparison of Gadobutrol Doses - Detection of Matched Enhanced Lesions: Blinded Reader 1
up to 2 hours after the injection of study medication
Accuracy Comparison of Gadobutrol Doses - Detection of Matched Enhanced Lesions: Blinded Reader 2
up to 2 hours after the injection of study medication
- +35 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Gadobutrol~0.03 mmol/kg BW (Gadavist, BAY86-4875)
EXPERIMENTALParticipant received one dose of 0.03 mmol/kg BW of Gadobutrol and one dose of 0.1 mmol/kg body weight (BW) of OptiMARK. The order in which the participants received Gadobutrol and OptiMARK was randomized. Gadobutrol was administered via a power injector at a rate of 5 mL/s followed by a 20 mL 0.9% saline flush at the same rate.
Gadobutrol~0.1 mmol/kg BW (Gadavist, BAY86-4875)
EXPERIMENTALParticipant received one dose of 0.1 mmol/kg BW of Gadobutrol and one dose of 0.1 mmol/kg BW of OptiMARK. The order in which the participants received Gadobutrol and OptiMARK was randomized. Gadobutrol was administered via a power injector at a rate of 5 mL/s followed by a 20 mL 0.9% saline flush at the same rate.
Gadobutrol~0.3 mmol/kg BW (Gadavist, BAY86-4875)
EXPERIMENTALParticipant received one dose of 0.3 mmol/kg BW of Gadobutrol and one dose of 0.1 mmol/kg BW of OptiMARK. The order in which the participants received Gadobutrol and OptiMARK was randomized. Gadobutrol was administered via a power injector at a rate of 5 mL/s followed by a 20 mL 0.9% saline flush at the same rate.
Interventions
Participant received one dose of 0.03 mmol/kg BW of Gadobutrol. Gadobutrol was administered via a power injector at a rate of 5 mL/s followed by a 20 mL 0.9% saline flush at the same rate.
Participant received one dose of 0.1 mmol/kg BW of Gadobutrol. Gadobutrol was administered via a power injector at a rate of 5 mL/s followed by a 20 mL 0.9% saline flush at the same rate.
Participant received one dose of 0.3 mmol/kg BW of Gadobutrol. Gadobutrol was administered via a power injector at a rate of 5 mL/s followed by a 20 mL 0.9% saline flush at the same rate.
Participant received one dose of 0.1 mmol/kg BW of OptiMARK. OptiMARK was administered via a power injector at a rate of 2 mL/s followed by a 20 mL 0.9% saline flush at the same rate.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with either known or highly suspected focal areas of disruption of the blood brain barrier (BBB) (eg, primary and secondary tumors, focal inflammatory or demyelinating disorders) and/or abnormal vascularity in the CNS, who are scheduled to undergo a routine contrast-enhanced MRI of the CNS.
- Patients with untreated brain tumors should constitute a minimum of 50% of the study population and patients with treated brain tumors will be limited to a maximum of 20% of the study population
You may not qualify if:
- Is a female patient who is pregnant or nursing.
- Is a female of childbearing potential and did not have a negative urine pregnancy test the same day as the administration of gadobutrol or comparator treatment.
- Has received any investigational product within 30 days prior to enrolling in this study.
- Has been previously enrolled in this study or any other study using gadobutrol.
- Has any contraindication to the MRI examinations.
- Has a history of severe allergic or anaphylactoid reaction to any allergen including drugs and contrast agents.
- Has received any contrast agent within 24 hours prior to gadobutrol contrast administration, or is scheduled to receive any contrast agent within 72 hours after the gadobutrol study.
- Is considered to be clinically unstable or his/her clinical course during the study period is unpredictable (eg, due to previous surgery, acute renal failure).
- Has been treated with high dose (\>55 cobalt Gy equivalent) photon radiation or global radiotherapy for CNS lesions at any time before entering the study.
- Is scheduled to receive chemotherapy or radiotherapy during the study period.
- Is expected or scheduled to have a change in any treatment or procedure between the comparator and gadobutrol MRIs that may alter their interpretation.
- Is scheduled or is likely to require a biopsy or surgery within the 72 hours after the gadobutrol MRI procedure, or is scheduled for or has undergone such interventions between the comparator and gadobutrol studies.
- Has severe cardiovascular disease.
- Has any contraindication to OptiMARK according to the package insert.
- Has more than 30 brain lesions detected by any prior imaging examination.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Bayerlead
Study Sites (27)
University of California Davis Medical Center
Sacramento, California, 95817, United States
University of California-San Diego Medical Center
San Diego, California, 92103, United States
Shands Jacksonville Medical Center
Jacksonville, Florida, 32209, United States
Emory University School of Medicine
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, United States
Northwestern Memorial Hospital
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
Indiana Neuroscience Institute
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46260, United States
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States
Boston Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02118, United States
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Methodist Hospital
Omaha, Nebraska, 68114, United States
NYU Langone Medical Center
New York, New York, 10016, United States
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Temple University Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19146, United States
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Health System
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States
Rhode Island Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, 02903, United States
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States
Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare
Memphis, Tennessee, 38104, United States
University of Washington Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98195, United States
University of Wisconsin - Madison
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792, United States
TCba Salguero
Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Fundacion Cientifica del Sur
Lornas de Zamora, Buenos Aires, B1832BQS, Argentina
Hospital da Beneficiência Portuguesa
São Paulo, São Paulo, 01323-001, Brazil
Centro de Diagnostico Medico
Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
Fundación Instituto de Alta tecnología médica de Antioquia
Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
DIME Clinica Neurocardiovascular S.A.
Cali, Valle del Cauca Department, Colombia
Fundación Clínica Valle del Lili
Cali, Colombia
Related Publications (1)
Breuer J, Gutierrez J, Latchaw R, Lehr R, Sorensen AG. Gadobutrol in the central nervous system at three doses: results from a phase II, randomized, multicenter trial. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Feb;39(2):410-8. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24180. Epub 2013 May 16.
PMID: 23681501DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
OptiMARK was used as a standard of reference in this study. A formal comparison of the efficacy of gadobutrol and OptiMARK was not specified prospectively in the statistical analysis plan. For completeness, the safety data of OptiMARK is presented.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Therapeutic Area Head
- Organization
- BAYER
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Bayer Study Director
Bayer
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 26, 2008
First Posted
March 17, 2009
Study Start
August 1, 2005
Primary Completion
March 1, 2007
Study Completion
March 1, 2007
Last Updated
January 13, 2014
Results First Posted
January 30, 2012
Record last verified: 2013-12