The Influence of Oral Hygiene on Local Wound and Systemic Infection in Patients With Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Placement
PEG
Predicting Oral Care Before Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG). The Influence of Oral Hygiene on Local Wound and Systemic Infection in Patients With PEG Placement
1 other identifier
interventional
50
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is commonly used for long term enteral feeding of patients with severe dysphagia. The most common complication is peristomal wound infection. The possible mechanism the bacterial from the oral cavity disseminate during the PEG insertion through the stomach to the abdominal wall, in spite the routine use of antibiotic prophylaxis, have reported low rates of wound infection in patients who were already receiving antibiotics at the time of PEG Our hypothesis that washing the oral cavity with antibiotic solution prior the insertion PEG , We planned a prospective, randomised, double blind, one centre study of antibiotic mouth wash solution (0.2% Chlorhexidine gluconate) as.prophylaxis in PEG
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started May 2009
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 10, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 11, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2009
CompletedMarch 11, 2009
March 1, 2009
6 months
March 10, 2009
March 10, 2009
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Assess impact mouth wash (containing 0.2% Chlorhexidine gluconate) (Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Haifa Israel) prior PEG insertion.
One month
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Follow the peristomal wound infection in patients who had prepared by mouth wash to a group a patients without mouth washing.
One month
Study Arms (2)
1
ACTIVE COMPARATOR2. Plain water
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients scheduled to undergo PEG
You may not qualify if:
- Previous GI surgery
- Coagulopathy
- Sepsis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 10, 2009
First Posted
March 11, 2009
Study Start
May 1, 2009
Primary Completion
November 1, 2009
Study Completion
December 1, 2009
Last Updated
March 11, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-03