Strength Training After Hip Fracture Surgery
Effect of Rehabilitation With Versus Without Progressive Strength Training Implemented in the Acute Ward After Hip Fracture Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of progressive strength training of the fractured limb in patients with hip fracture, during admittance in an acute orthopedic ward. The primary study hypothesis is that the training will reduce the strength deficit in the fractured limb in comparison with the non-fractured limb. Secondary, that patients following the intervention will present larger improvements in physical function compared to controls.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2013
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 19, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 20, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2015
CompletedJune 3, 2015
June 1, 2015
1.7 years
February 19, 2009
June 2, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Knee-extension strength in the fractured limb in comparison with the non-fractured limb.
Maximal isometric knee-extension strength in the fractured limb in percentage of non-fractured limb. Isometric knee-extension strength will be measured using an externally fixated handheld dynamometer (Power Track II Commander; JTech Medical, Utah). A stap will be attached to the bed/chair and the patient's ankle (perpendicular to the lower leg), ensuring 90 degrees of knee flexion and an isometric contraction. The transducer will be placed under the strap at ankle level, just proximal to the malleolus, and the participant will be asked to extend the leg as forcefully as possible. Knee-extension strength will be expressed as the maximal voluntary torque per kilo body mass (\[NIm\]/kg), using the distance between the lateral femoral epicondyle and the center of the transducer and the body mass of each patient. The best of 4 trials for each limb will be used in analyses. The primary analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle (last observation carried forward).
At inclusion, at postoperative day 10 and/or at discharge.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Timed up and go test
From inclusion to postoperative day 10 and/or discharge
Other Outcomes (4)
10 meter fast speed, Cumulated Ambulation Score.
At discharge and during in-hospital stay.
Short Falls Efficacy Scale-International (Short FES-I)
At discharge
Verbal Ranking Scale (VRS)
During in-hospital stay.
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Rehabilitation without strength training
ACTIVE COMPARATORBasic mobility and exercise therapy without strength training following a guideline with 12 specific exercises, progressed individually.
Rehabilitation with strength training
EXPERIMENTALBasic mobility and exercise therapy following a guideline with 12 specific exercises, progressed individually, and supplemented with progressive knee-extension strength training (10RM) of fractured limb every day during admission.
Interventions
Basic mobility and exercise therapy following a guideline with 12 specific exercises, progressed individually, and supplemented with progressive knee-extension strength training (10RM) of the fractured limb using ankle weight cuffs, daily during hospital stay.
Basic mobility and exercise therapy without strength training following a guideline with 12 specific exercises, progressed individually.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Primary hip fracture surgery
- years or older
- Speak and understand the Danish language
- Able to give informed consent
- Home-dwelling with and independent prefracture indoor walking ability equal to New Mobility Score \>=2
You may not qualify if:
- Multiple fractures
- Weightbearing restrictions
- Patient unwilling to participate in appropriate rehabilitation
- Not able to cooperate to tests
- Terminal illness
- Patients who want an observer present at the information interview, but where such one is not available.
- Patients with a cervical hip fracture treated with Total Hip Arthroplasty or hip pins, due to expected short length of hospital stay.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Orthopedic Surgery hvidovre hospital
Hvidovre, Copenhagen, 2650, Denmark
Related Publications (1)
Kronborg L, Bandholm T, Palm H, Kehlet H, Kristensen MT. Effectiveness of acute in-hospital physiotherapy with knee-extension strength training in reducing strength deficits in patients with a hip fracture: A randomised controlled trial. PLoS One. 2017 Jun 29;12(6):e0179867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179867. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 28662153DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lise Kronborg, MSc
PMR-C, Copenhagen University at Hvidovre Hospital.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Seniorresearcher, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 19, 2009
First Posted
February 20, 2009
Study Start
October 1, 2013
Primary Completion
June 1, 2015
Study Completion
June 1, 2015
Last Updated
June 3, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-06