An Investigation of the Safety of 4 Different Doses of Autologous Muscle Derived Cells as Therapy for Stress Urinary Incontinence
Muscle Cell Mediated Therapy for Stress Urinary Incontinence: An Investigation of the Safety of 4 Different Doses of Autologous Muscle Derived Cells.
2 other identifiers
interventional
66
2 countries
3
Brief Summary
This is a clinical investigation approved by US FDA and Canadian Health Authority to study the safety and potential effectiveness of the autologous muscle cells for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Oct 2008
Typical duration for phase_2
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 9, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 18, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 19, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 2, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 2, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 1, 2014
CompletedSeptember 8, 2023
August 1, 2023
3.1 years
February 18, 2009
November 12, 2013
August 25, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Number of Participants That Experienced Biopsy Procedure-related Adverse Events
Biopsy was required to generate AMDC products. Biopsy procedure-related events were defined as systemic responses to the biopsy procedure or injury at the biopsy site. Since biopsy occurred prior to AMDC treatment, results are presented independent of AMDC dose received. All biopsy procedure-related events either self-resolved or were easily treated.
at biopsy or between biopsy and treatment
Biopsy Procedure-related Adverse Events
Biopsy was required to generate AMDC products. Biopsy procedure-related events were defined as systemic responses to the biopsy procedure or injury at the biopsy site. Since biopsy occurred prior to AMDC treatment, results are presented independent of AMDC dose received. All biopsy procedure-related events either self-resolved or were easily treated.
at biopsy or between biopsy and treatment
Number of Participants That Experienced Injection Procedure-related Adverse Events
AMDC treatment was administered via intrasphincteric injection. Injection procedure-related events were defined as systemic responses to the injection procedure or genitourinary events occurring within 30 days of the injection procedure that could be attributed to cystoscopy or catheterization. Since these events could be attributed to the injection procedure, results are considered independent of AMDC dose received. All injection procedure-related events self-resolved or were easily treated.
30 days
Injection Procedure-related Adverse Events
AMDC treatment was administered via intrasphincteric injection. Injection procedure-related events were defined as systemic responses to the injection procedure or genitourinary events occurring within 30 days of the injection procedure that could be attributed to cystoscopy or catheterization. Since these events could be attributed to the injection procedure, results are considered independent of AMDC dose received. All injection procedure-related events self-resolved or were easily treated.
30 days
Number of Participants That Experienced AMDC Product-related Adverse Events
If an immune response after injection or any urinary retention occurred and seemed suspicious, the physicians were consulted to determine whether the effect was likely related to the AMDC product. No adverse events reported during the study were adjudicated as AMDC product-related.
12 months
Study Arms (2)
1
OTHERTransurethral dose escalation
2
OTHERPeriurethral dose escalation
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient has SUI with normal detrusor activity confirmed with urodynamics
- Patient has bladder capacity \>200 mL
- Patient's incontinence has not shown any improvement for at least -6 months
- Patient has failed prior treatments (e.g., behavior modification, bladder exercises, biofeedback, electrical stimulation, bulking injections, urethral suspensions and/or drug therapy)
You may not qualify if:
- Patient has known vesicoureteral reflux, vaginal prolapse beyond the introitus, or other significant pelvic floor abnormalities with high pressure instability
- Patient has a neuromuscular disorder (e.g., muscular dystrophy, multiple sclerosis)
- Patient has uncontrolled diabetes
- Patient is pregnant, lactating, or plans to become pregnant during the course of the study
- Patient is morbidly obese (defined as 100 pounds over their ideal body weight, or BMI ≥40) and would not be expected to benefit from treatment
- Patient has current or acute conditions involving cystitis or urethritis
- Patient is scheduled to receive radiation treatment to the vicinity
- Patients with a history of radiation treatment to the urethra or adjacent structures
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cook MyoSitelead
Study Sites (3)
Wm Beaumont Hospital
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073, United States
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232, United States
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Ron Jankowski, PhD
- Organization
- Cook MyoSite, Inc.
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kenneth Peters, MD
Corewell Health East
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 18, 2009
First Posted
February 19, 2009
Study Start
October 9, 2008
Primary Completion
November 2, 2011
Study Completion
November 2, 2011
Last Updated
September 8, 2023
Results First Posted
January 1, 2014
Record last verified: 2023-08