NCT00845195

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of Olopatadine Nasal Spray with Azelastine Nasal Spray when treatments are utilized in conjunction with Fluticasone Nasal Spray for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Trial Health

80
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
150

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 13, 2009

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 18, 2009

Completed
11 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2009

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2009

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 21, 2010

Completed
Last Updated

April 27, 2010

Status Verified

April 1, 2010

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

February 13, 2009

Results QC Date

March 25, 2010

Last Update Submit

April 22, 2010

Conditions

Keywords

RhinitisAllergyNasal SprayAntihistamineIntranasal Corticosteroid

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Mean Change in Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) From Baseline

    Responses to patient-completed diaries for reflective Total Nasal Symptom Scores (rTNSS). TNSS is composed of 4 individual assessments, which included runny nose, itchy nose, stuffy nose, and sneezing; each of the 4 assessments were rated using a 4 point scale that ranged in whole units from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). All 4 assessments are then added together for a composite score (TNSS score), the maximum of which could be 12 . Reflective scores were assessed from the hour since the last dose of study medication.

    14 days minus baseline

  • Mean Change in Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Scores (rTOSS) From Baseline

    Responses to patient-completed diaries for reflective Total Ocular Symptom Scores (rTOSS). TOSS is composed of 3 individual assessments of ocular symptoms (itching/burning, tearing/watering, redness) each of the 3 assessments were rated using a 4 point scale that ranged in whole units from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). All 3 assessments are then added together for a composite score (TOSS score), the maximum of which could be 9 . Reflective scores were assessed from the hour since the last dose of study medication.

    14 days minus baseline

  • Mean Change in Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Scores (iTNSS) From Baseline

    Responses to patient-completed diaries for instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Scores (iTNSS). TNSS is composed of 4 individual assessments, which included runny nose, itchy nose, stuffy nose, and sneezing; each of the 4 assessments were rated using a 4 point scale that ranged in whole units from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). All 4 assessments are then added together for a composite score (TNSS score), the maximum of which could be 12 . Instantaneous scores were assessed at the time of daily dosing.

    14 days minus baseline

  • Mean Change in Instantaneous Total Ocular Symptom Scores (iTOSS) From Baseline

    Responses to patient-completed diaries for instantaneous Total Ocular Symptom Scores (iTOSS). TOSS is composed of 3 individual assessments of ocular symptoms (itching/burning, tearing/watering, redness) each of the 3 assessments were rated using a 4 point scale that ranged in whole units from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). All 3 assessments are then added together for a composite score (TOSS score), the maximum of which could be 9 . Instantaneous scores were assessed at the time of daily dosing.

    14 days minus baseline

Study Arms (2)

Olopatadine HCl Nasal Spray, 0.6%

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: Olopatadine HCl Nasal Spray, 0.6%

Azelastine HCl Nasal Spray, 0.1%

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: Azelastine HCl Nasal Spray, 0.1%

Interventions

2 sprays/nostril, twice daily (in addition to Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray 50 mcg 2 sprays/nostril once daily) for 14 +/- 3 days

Olopatadine HCl Nasal Spray, 0.6%

2 sprays/nostril, twice daily (in addition to Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray 50 mcg 2 sprays/nostril once daily) for 14 +/- 3 days

Azelastine HCl Nasal Spray, 0.1%

Eligibility Criteria

Age12 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Able to provide consent/assent
  • History of spring/summer allergic rhinitis
  • Positive skin prick and/or intradermal test
  • Absence of significant anatomic abnormalities, infection, bleeding, and mucosal ulcerations
  • Non-pregnant (where applicable)
  • Able to complete daily diary

You may not qualify if:

  • Smoker
  • Concurrent disease such as rhinitis medicamentosa or large obstructive nasal polyps
  • History of current chronic sinusitis
  • Asthma
  • Use of anti-allergy immunotherapy, corticosteroids, chronic use of long acting antihistamines
  • History of severe, unstable, or uncontrolled cardiovascular, hepatic, renal and/or other diseases/illnesses
  • History or evidence of nasolacrimal drainage system malfunction

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Alcon Call Center for Trial Locations

Fort Worth, Texas, 76134, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Rhinitis, Allergic, SeasonalRhinitisHypersensitivity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Rhinitis, AllergicNose DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesRespiratory HypersensitivityOtorhinolaryngologic DiseasesHypersensitivity, ImmediateImmune System DiseasesRespiratory Tract InfectionsInfections

Results Point of Contact

Title
Alcon Clinical
Organization
Alcon Research Ltd.

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2009

First Posted

February 18, 2009

Study Start

March 1, 2009

Primary Completion

May 1, 2009

Last Updated

April 27, 2010

Results First Posted

April 21, 2010

Record last verified: 2010-04

Locations