NCT00843063

Brief Summary

Low-dose aspirin can prevent cerebral and cardiovascular accidents in individuals with symptomatic atherothrombotic disease, but its use is frequently limited by gastrointestinal side effects. The position of H2-receptor antagonists as a step-down therapy after healing of peptic ulcer or erosions by proton pump inhibitor is unclear. The objective of this randomized, double blinded control study was to compare the efficacy of high-dose famotidine with pantoprazole in the prevention of recurrent dyspeptic or complicated ulcer/ erosions in patients taking low-dose aspirin

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
161

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2004

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2004

Completed
4.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2008

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2008

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 12, 2009

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 13, 2009

Completed
Last Updated

February 13, 2009

Status Verified

February 1, 2009

Enrollment Period

4.3 years

First QC Date

February 12, 2009

Last Update Submit

February 12, 2009

Conditions

Keywords

pantoprazolefamotidineaspirindyspepsiagastrointestinal bleedingpeptic ulcer / erosion

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The primary end-point was the recurrence of dyspeptic or complicated ulcer / erosions.

    48 weeks

Study Arms (2)

pantoprazole

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

pantoprazole 20 mg om and matching placebo nocte

Drug: pantoprazole vs famotidine

famotidine

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Famotidine 40 mg om and nocte

Drug: pantoprazole vs famotidine

Interventions

pantoprazole 20 mg om and matching placebo nocte vs. famotidine 40 mg om and nocte

Also known as: pantoloc, famotidine
famotidinepantoprazole

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • upper GIB or dyspepsia due to peptic ulcers / erosions while receiving low-dose aspirin with a daily dose ranging from 80 mg to 320 mg
  • endoscopy revealed a gastric or duodenal ulcers of 3 mm or more in diameter with unequivocal depth, or more than 5 erosions in the stomach or duodenum
  • they required continuous low-dose aspirin for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease, peripheral vascular disease and ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attacks
  • years old or older.

You may not qualify if:

  • concurrent erosive or ulcerative esophagitis
  • pyloric stenosis
  • previous gastric or duodenal surgery other than oversewing of a perforation
  • thrombocytopenia
  • renal failure with estimated creatinine clearance less than 10 ml / min
  • active cancer
  • known allergic to aspirin, famotidine or pantoprazole
  • pregnancy, lactation, child-bearing potential in the absence of contraception
  • psychosomatic disorder
  • planned co-prescription of nonsteriodal anti-inflammatory drugs corticosteriod, or anticoagulant
  • disorders that might modify the absorption of study drugs

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ruttonjee Hospital

Wan Chai, Hong Kong, China

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Peptic UlcerDyspepsiaGastrointestinal Hemorrhage

Interventions

Famotidine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Duodenal DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesStomach DiseasesSigns and Symptoms, DigestiveSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsHemorrhagePathologic Processes

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ThiazolesSulfur CompoundsOrganic ChemicalsAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Study Officials

  • Fook Hong Ng, M.D.

    Department of Medicine, Ruttonjee Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 12, 2009

First Posted

February 13, 2009

Study Start

August 1, 2004

Primary Completion

December 1, 2008

Study Completion

December 1, 2008

Last Updated

February 13, 2009

Record last verified: 2009-02

Locations