Evaluation of the Efficacy and Tolerability of Clobetasol Propionate Foam Compared to Vehicle Foam
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of Clobetasol Propionate vs. Vehicle in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Plaque-Type Psoriasis
1 other identifier
interventional
58
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of Clobetasol propionate to that of its Vehicle in the treatment of mild to moderate plaque-type psoriasis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Nov 2007
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 11, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 12, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 30, 2012
CompletedOctober 9, 2017
October 1, 2017
1 month
February 11, 2009
December 21, 2011
October 5, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With a Target Lesion Global Improvement (TLGI) Score of 0, 1, or 2 at Weeks 1, 2, and 4
The investigator assessed the TLGI of participants relative to their initial Baseline condition based on a 7-point scale: 0=completely cleared, possible residual discoloration; 1=almost cleared, 90% improvement, very significant clearance with only traces of disease remaining; 2=marked improvement, approximately 75%, with some disease remaining; 3=moderate improvement, approximately 50%; 4=mild improvement, approximately 25%, significant disease remains; 5=no change, no detectable improvement; 6=excerbation, worsening of signs and symptoms of disease.
Weeks 1, 2, and 4
Secondary Outcomes (16)
Number of Participants With a TLGI Score of 0, 1, 2, or 3 at Weeks 1, 2, and 4
Weeks 1, 2, and 4
Number of Participants With a Pruritus (Overall) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 2
Week 2
Number of Participants With an Erythema Score of 0 or 1 at Week 2
Week 2
Number of Participants With a Scaling Score of 0 or 1 at Week 2
Week 2
Number of Participants With a Plaque Thickness Score of 0 or 1 at Week 2
Week 2
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Clobetasol Propionate Foam
EXPERIMENTALTopical foam formulation that includes clobetasol propionate (Steroid)
Vehicle Foam
PLACEBO COMPARATORVehicle foam is the same as the clobetasol propionate foam except it does not include the active drug.
Interventions
Topical Clobetasol propionate foam
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Outpatient, male or female of any race, and at least 12 years of age. Female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test result at baseline and practice a reliable method of contraception throughout the study.
- Mild to moderate, plaque-type psoriasis
- Target lesion on the trunk or extremities (excluding palms/soles, elbows, or knees) with a score of 2 or 3 for each of erythema, scaling and plaque thickness
- Able to understand the requirements of the study and sign Informed Consent/HIPAA Authorization Forms. Subjects under the legal age of consent in the state where the study is conducted must also have the written, informed consent of a parent or legal guardian.
You may not qualify if:
- Female subjects who are pregnant (positive urine pregnancy test) breast feeding or who are of childbearing potential and not practicing a reliable method of birth control
- Known allergy to clobetasol propionate or other topical corticosteroids; or to any component of the investigational formulations
- Subjects who have not complied with the proper wash-out periods for prohibited medications
- Medical condition that in the opinion of the investigator, contraindicates the subject's participation in the clinical study
- Skin disease/disorder that might interfere with the study related diagnosis or evaluations
- Evidence of recent alcohol or drug abuse
- History of poor cooperation, non-compliance with medical treatment or unreliability
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Stiefel, a GSK Companylead
- GlaxoSmithKlinecollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Center for Dermatology, Cosmetic and Laser
Fremont, California, 94538, United States
Dermatology Specialists
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- GSK Response Center
- Organization
- GlaxoSmithKline
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
GSK Clinical Trials
GlaxoSmithKline
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 11, 2009
First Posted
February 12, 2009
Study Start
November 1, 2007
Primary Completion
December 1, 2007
Study Completion
January 1, 2008
Last Updated
October 9, 2017
Results First Posted
January 30, 2012
Record last verified: 2017-10